Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. Student, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding Sanandaj, Iran

2 Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Hamedan, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding Sanandaj, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Sugar beet has long-growth period and high-water use. Thus, managing to reduce water consumption and decline growth period causes to increase the crop productivity. Sugar beet provides more than one-half of sugar produced in the United States and about 40% of sugar production in the world. The root of this crop contains 13- 22% sugar content. In general sugar beet also has a major role in the human diet and it is the mainstay parts of the agriculture economy in Iran. The leaves of sugar beet comprise the main light receptor organ for a crop. Leaf area development early during the season causes more efficient use of sunlight since it is important to the formation and expansion of the canopy. Sugar beet in the primary growth stages needs a warm and sunny climate and optimum water supply for optimal photosynthesis and photoassimilate partitioning.
Material and method
This purpose study was performed in the research field of Hamedan in 2016. The experiment was conducted in a split-split plot based on RCB design with four replications. Experimental treatments were planting date at two levels as main plot (May 14 and June 28), irrigation at two levels as sub-plot (full irrigation and 75% of full irrigation or water requirement), and cultivar at 3 levels (two premature hybrids and the resistant cultivar to Rhizoctonia (Arya)) as sub-sub-plot at 2016 crop season. Studied traits were root yield, sugar content, sugar yield, and Enzyme activities such as SOD, PO, leaf chlorophyll, and some physiological and morphologic traits. SAS software version 9.1 was used to analyze the data. Also, the mean of the studied parameters was compared using the least significant difference test (LSD) at the level of 5 percent probability.
 Results and discussion
Based on the results of the analysis of variance, the difference between planting dates in terms of superoxide dismutase content, root yield, sugar yield, white sugar yield, and water use efficiency was significant at the level of 1% probability. There was a significant difference between irrigation levels in terms of superoxide dismutase and water use efficiency at 1% probability level and membrane lipid peroxidation content, peroxidase enzyme, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid content at 5% probability level. There was a significant difference between the studied genotypes in terms of root yield and sugar yield at a probability level of 1% and in terms of white sugar yield and water use efficiency at a probability level of 5%. The interaction effect of culture date on genotype was significant in terms of the effect on the percentage of white sugar and yield of white sugar at the level of 1% probability. The interaction effect of irrigation levels in genotype was significant only on water use efficiency at the level of 1% probability. The results showed that irrigation level 75% of plant water requirement compared to 100% level increased, hydrogen peroxide content, membrane lipid peroxidation, peroxidase activity and superoxide dismutase activity by 14.83, 25, 17.38, and 26%, respectively and reduced chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid content by 15%, 12%, and 14%, respectively. Also, the amount of superoxide dismutase activity and root yield on planting on May 14 was 33% and 26% higher than planting on July 28, respectively. Root yield in 33868 and 33872 hybrids was higher than Aria cultivar. The results also showed that the difference between the planting dates of May 14 and June 28 in the two hybrids 33868 and 33872 was not significant in terms of sugar content, white sugar yield, and water use efficiency. Also, the planting date of June 28 increased the percentage of white sugar in both hybrids. Finally, two hybrids, 33868 and 33872, obtained the highest water efficiency in the treatment of 75% of the required water.
 Conclusions
In the conditions that there is a possibility of delay in the cultivation of sugar beet, planting two hybrids, two hybrids 33868 and 33872, is recommended.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abayomi, Y.A., Wright, D., 2002. Sugar beet leaf growth and yield response to soil water deficit. African Crop Science Journal. 10, 51-66.
Abdolahian Nogabi, M., 1993. The investigation of quantity and quality parameters of sugar beet growth in various planting date. (MSc. thesis) Tarbiat Modarres University. 1993. [In Persian].
Arnon, A.N., 1967. Method of extraction of chlorophyll in the plants. Agronomy Journal. 23, 112-121.
Bai, L., Sui, F., 2006. Effect of soil drought stress on leaf of maize. Pedosphere. 16, 326-332.
Birhane, E., Sterck, F.J., Fetene, M., Bongers, F., Kuyper, T.W., 2012. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance photosynthesis, water use efficiency, and growth of frankincense seedlings under pulsed water availability conditions. Oecologia.169, 895- 904.
Campbell, L.G., Enz, J.W., 1991. Temperature effects on sugar beet seedling emergence. J. of Sugar Beet Research. 28, 129-140. 
Chołuj, D., Wiśniewska, A., Szafrański, K.M., Cebula, J., Gozdowski, D., Podlaski, S., 2014. Assessment of the physiological responses to drought in different sugar beet genotypes in connection with their genetic distance. Journal of Plant Physiology. 171, 1221- 1230.
Cooke, D.A., Scott, R.K., 1993. The sugar beet crop: science to practice. Chapman and Hall, London. 678pp.
Curcic, Z., Ciric, M., Nagl, N., Taski-Ajdukovic, K., 2018. Effect of sugar beet genotype, planting and harvesting dates and their interaction on sugar yield. Frontiers in Plant Science.  4, 1- 9.
De Vos, C.H.R., Schat, H., De Waal, M.A.M., Vooijs, R., Ernst, W.H.O., 1991. Increased resistance to copper-induced damage of the root cell plasmalemma in copper tolerant Silene cucubalus. Physiologia Plantarum. 82, 523-528.‏
FAOSTAT., 2019. Crops-Production/Yield quantities of Sugar beet. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/ (Accessed October 4th 2019).
Guerfel, M., Baccouri, O., Boujnah, D., Cha, W., Zarrouk, M. 2008. Impacts of water stress on gas exchange, water elations, chlorophyll content and leaf structure in the two main Tunisian olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars, Scientia Horticulturae 1, 1-7.
Halliwell, B., Gutteridge, J.M., 2015. Free radicals in biology and medicine. Oxford University Press, USA, 569 P.
Iturbe-ormaetxe, I., Escuredo, P.R., Arrese-Igor, C., Becana, M., 1998. Oxidative damage in pea plant exposed to water deficit or paraquat. Plant Physiology. 116, 173-181.
Jahani Moghadam, E., Parsa, S., Mahmoudi, S., Ahmadi, M., 2017. The Effects of planting date and cultivar on yield and the early flowering in autumn sowing of sugar beet varieties. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding. 13, 57-43. [In Persian with English summary].
Jihad Akbar, M.D., Babaei, B., Basati, J., Abbasi, Z., 2013. Effect of different methods of cultivation in saline lands on sugar beet quality and quantity. Journal of Sugar Beet. 29,189-199. [In Persian with English summary].
Khozaei, M., Kamgar, A., Haghighi, A., Zand Parsa, S., Sepaskhah, A.R., Razzaghi, F., Yousefabadi, V., Emamd, Y., 2020. Evaluation of direct seeding and transplanting in sugar beet for water productivity, yield and quality under different irrigation regimes and planting densities. Agricultural Water Management. 238, 1-12.
Kucharki, C.J., 2006. A multi decadal trend of earlier corn planting in the central USA. Agronomy Journal. 98, 1544-1550.
Laura, D., Zolatan, B., Tomas, H., Tamas, A., Tamas, S., 2003. Crop planting date matters: Estimation methods and effect on future yields. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 223, 103-115.
Loreto, F., Velikova, V., 2001. Isoprene produced by leaves protects the photosynthetic apparatus against ozone damage, quenches ozone products, and reduces lipid peroxidation of cellular membranes. Journal of Plant Physiology. 127, 1781-1787.
MacAdam, J.W., Nelson, R., and Sharp, E., 1992. Peroxidase activity in the leaf elongation zone of tall fescue. Plant Physiology. 99, 872-878
Mirzaei, M.R.,  Abdollahian- Noghabi, M.,  2012. Study of sugar beet growth pattern in Hamedan, Iran. Journal of Sugar Beet. 27(2), 1-9.
Nabi Ilkaee, M., Babaei, Z., Baghdadi, A., Golzardi, F., 2016. Effect of different planting dates and defoliation on the properties of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.).  Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences. 4, 52- 58.
Pahlavanian Miandoab, S.H.,  Dadashi, M. R., Mir Mahmoudi, T., Shahrooghbi, A., Adjam Norouzi, H., 2021. Study Qualitative and quantitative traits of sugar beet cultivars at different planting times in transplanting and seedling cultivation system in West Azarbaijan area. Journal of Crop Production. 13, 23-40.
Putnik-Delic, M., Maksimovic, I., Venezia, A., Nagl, N., 2013.Free proline accumulation in young sugar beet plants and in tissue culture explants under water deficiency as tools for assessment of drought tolerance. Romanian Agricultural Research. 30, 141- 148.
Ruiz-Sánchez, M., Aroca, R., Muñoz, Y., Armada, E., Polón, R., Ruiz-Lozano, J.M., 2010. The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis enhances the photosynthetic efficiency and the antioxidative response of rice plants subjected to drought stress. Journal of Plant Physiology. 167, 862–869.
Sadeghzadeh Hamati, S., Shirzadi, M. H., Aghaei Zadeh, M., Fatollah Taleghani, D.,  Javaheri, A., Asgari, A., 2012. Evaluation of sowing and harvesting date effects on yield and quality of five sugar beet cultivars in Jiroft region (autumn planting).  Journal of Sugar Beet. 28, 25-42. [In Persian with English summary].
Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S., Fetholla Taleghani, D., Kashani, A., Siadat, A.S., Normouhamadi, G., 2009. Effect of sowing date, planting density and cultivar on solar radiation interception indices in sugar beet. II Radiation use efficiency. Journal of Sugar beet. 25, 53-69. [In Persian with English summary].
Scott, R.K., Jaggard, K.W., 1993. Crop physiology and agronomy. In: Cooke, D.A., Scott, R.K. (eds.), The sugar beet crop. PP. 179-237. Londan, Champan and Hall.
Shabiri, S., Ghasemi Golazani, K., Golchin, A., Saba, J., 2006. Effect of irrigation water on phenology and yield of three chickpea cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Agricultural Knowledge. 16, 137-147. [In Persian with English summary].
Shibles, R.M., Webers, C.R., 1966. Interception of solar radiation and dry matter production by various soybean planting patterns. Crop Science. 6, 55- 59.
Stibbe, C., Marlander, B., 2002.  Field emergence dynamics significance to intraspecific competition and growth efficiency in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). European Journal of Agronomy. 17, 161- 171.
Taherkhanchi, A., Akbari, G.A., Modarres-Sanavy, S.A.M., Ghorbani Javid, M., 2014. Evaluation of effects of bio-fertilizers on some physiological and biochemical traits in soybean under water deficit condition. Agricultural Crop Management. 15, 141-153. [In Persian with English summary].
Taleghanii, D., Habibi, F.D., Abadi, V., Ghohari, J., Jegini, M.A., Gasem, B.M., 2004. Determination of optimum plant density and sowing arrangement of sugar beet at sprinkler irrigation system. Abstracts of 6th Iranian Agronomy and plant breeding Congress. Babolsar. Mazandaran University, 12-16 Shahrivar. 456 pp. [In Persian].
Topak, R., Suheri, S., Acar, B., 2010. Comparison of energy of irrigation regimes in sugar beet production in a semi-arid region. Energy Journal. 35, 5464-5471.
ICUMSA, 2009. International Commission for Uniform Methods of Sugar Analysis, Methods Book. Berlin, Bartens.
Vahidi, H., Rajabi, A., Seyed Hadi, M., Fathollah Taleghani, D., 2013. Screening of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) genotype for drought tolerance IJACS. 1104-1113.