Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Agrotechnology, Varamin Branch Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Isfahan(Khorasgan) Branch Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Corn (Zea mays L) is an annual cereal crop adapted to various ecological conditions. Corn with wheat and rice are three strategic agricultural products in the world. Drought stress is the crucial factor to limit the production of corn among abiotic stresses. Drought stress in corn reduces photosynthesis, and consequently grain yield by reducing the leaf chlorophyll level. Many external and internal factors are effective in plant growth. The most important internal factors are hormones and the most important external factors are light and temperature. Hormones regulate Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs) and coordinate the processes occurring in different parts of the plant body. Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs) increase plant tolerance to various environmental stresses, such as drought, salinity, cold, and heat, and this increase in tolerance to environmental stresses depends on the production of transcripts of anti-stress genes, such as heat shock genes and LEA genes. It is possible to divide the products of genes induced under drought stress conditions into two categories: (1) Those playing a direct protective role against stresses; (2) Those controlling gene expression and message transmission. The Rab-17 gene is one of the genes whose expression increases during drought stress following an increase in ABA. This gene belongs to second group LEA proteins. Several gene products identical to Rab17-encoded proteins have been identified in different plants. Studies indicate that LEA proteins act as water-binding molecules in grains and protect other proteins against the negative effects of drought, including ion separation from macro molecules and membrane protection against freezing damage. This study was conducted to examine the effect of the foliar application of proline amino acid and growth regulators, including benzyl adenine, gibberellic acid, as well as the combination of benzyl adenine and gibberellic acid and proline amino acid on the growth, yield and expression of the Rab-17 gene in corn (Zea mays L) (Single Cross 704) under drought stress.
Material and methods
This study was conducted as a split plot on the base of randomized complete block design with three replications in 2015 and 2016. Three irrigation treatments were considered, including after 70 (control), 90, and 100 mm evaporation from the surface of standard Class A evaporation pan as the main agent. Phytohormones BA6, GA (3+ 7), proline amino acid, BA6+ GA (3+ 7) +AA and pure water as control were considered five levels of the sub-factor. The plants were irrigated every 10 days before water stress was applied. Mild and severe stress treatments were applied 45 days after planting and in the 12-leaf stage. Afterward, foliar Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs) and proline were applied in the stem elongation stage of corn.
Results and discussion
The results and analysis of the data indicate that all the measured traits decreased with drought stress; however, the proline content increased by increasing the drought stress. For example, drought stress reduced forage yield by 46%. Corn yield was 1.3 times of the control treatment under severe drought stress with foliar application of proline amino acid. In the genetic experiments, increase of drought stress did not increase the PCR response to the Rab-17 gene due to the increased secretion of abscisic acid (ABA) and susceptibility of single cross 704 to drought stress.
Conclusions
According to the results, the foliar application of proline amino acid and Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs) can improve the growth and yield of corn under drought stress by improving plant physiological and genetic responses. Furthermore, the change in the expression of a number of genes appears to be occurred in response to drought stress. The results indicate that gene expression plays a vital role in the drought tolerance of corn; hence, it is suggested to be highly examined in further studies. It is possible that the current results draw our attention to the effects of tested Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs) on the physiology and genetic contents of corn in drought conditions to use the regulators at the right time to deal with environmental stresses in addition to perform proper management in the field, and to increase the efficiency of roots to uptake nutrients.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Islamic Azad University, Varamin and the Khorasgan branches, as well as Isfahan University of Technology for providing the university with necessary facilities and performing protein and genetic tests.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Ahmadi, A.,Siosehmard, A., 2004. Effect of drought stress on soluble carbohydrates of chlorophyll and proline in four wheat cultivars adapted to different climatic conditions of Iran.Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 35, 7-763. [In Persian with English Summary]
Ali, F., Bano, A., Fazal, A., 2017. Recent methods of drought stress tolerance in plants. Plant Growth Regulation. 82, 363-375.
Allagulova,  C.H.R.,  Gimalov,  F.R.,  Shakiriva,  F.M., Vakhitov,  V.A., 2003. The plant dehdrins,  structure and putative functions. Biochemistry. 68, 945-951.
Ardakani, M.R., Nadvar, R., 2010. Principles and Techniques for Plant and Scientist (translated). Tehran University. 502 pp. [In Persian].
Athar, H.R., Ashraf, M., 2005. Photosynthesis under Drought Stress. In: Pessarakli M, editor. Handbook of Photosynthesis. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, pp. 793-804
Azimi, S.M., Nabati, E., Shaban, M., Lak, M., 2013. Effect of N and P bio fertilizers on yield components of barley. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research. 2, 365-370.
Bartlez, N., Danin-Poleg, Y., Tzuri,  G., Karchi,  Z., Lavi,  U., Cregan, P.B.,  2005. Length polymorphism and homologies of microsatellites in several Curcubitaceae species.  Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 93, 1282-1290.
Bassetti, P., Westgate, M.E., 1993. Water deficit affect receptivity of maize silks. Crop Science. 33, 278-182.
Bates, L.S., Waldern, R.P., Tear, I.D., 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil. 39, 205-207.
Bolanos, J., Edmeades, G.O., 1997. The importance of the anthesis silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize. Field Crop Research. 48, 65-80.
Bruchner, P.L., Fohbery, R.C., 1987. Stress tolerance and adaptation in Spring wheat. Crop Science. 27, 31-36.
Chai, Q., Gan, Y., Zhao, C., Xu, H.L., Waskom, R.M., Niu, Y., Siddique, K.H., 2016. Regulated deficit irrigation for crop production under drought stress. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 36, 3.
Chaudhuri, N.V.,Kanemasa, E.T., 1982. Effects of water gradient on sorghum growth,water relations and yield. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 62, 599-607.
Clouse, S.D., Zurek, D.M., McMorris, T.C., Baker, M.E., 1992. Effect of brassinolide on gene expression in elongating soybean epicotyls. Plant Physiology. 100, 1377-1383
Dehghanzadeh, H.,Nozad namini, K., 2006. The effect of low irrigation treatments on the accumulation of proline, soluble free sugars and potassium in bread wheat cultivars. Journal of Ecophysiological Crops. 1(1), 16-20. [In Persian with English Summary].
Dure, L., 1993. A repeating 11-mer amino acid motif and plant desiccation. Plant Journal. 3, 363–369.
Efeoglu, B., Ekmekci, Y., Cicek, N., 2009. Physiological responses of three maize cultivars to drought stress and recovery. South African Journal of Botany. 75, 34–42.
Fendina, I.S., Tsonev, T., Guleva, E.L., 1984. The effect of pretreatment with praline on the responses of (Pisum sativum L.) to salt stress. Photosynthetica. 29, 521-527.
Jahanbakhsh, S., Chilan H., Razavi, K., 2017. Effects of water deficit on the physiological response, total protein, and gene expression of Rab17in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Journal of Plant Process and Function. 5(18), 35-42.
Jain, M., Kataria, S., Hirve, M., Prajapati, R., 2019. Water Deficit Stress Effects and Responses in Maize. In: Hasanuzzaman, M., Hakeem, K., Nahar, K., Alharby, H. (eds), Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Springer, Cham. pp. 129-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06118-0_5
Jyothsnakumari, G., Thippeswamy, M.,  Veeranagamallaiah,  G., Sudhakar,  C., 2009. Differential expression of LEA proteins in two genotypes of mulberry undersalinity. Plant Biology. 53, 145-150.
Karimi, M.M., Siddique, K. H. M., 1991. Crop growth rates of old and modern wheat cultivars. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 42, 13-20. [In Persian with English Summary].
Khodabandeh,N., 2000. Cereals. Tehran University Press, 537 pp. [In Persian].
Kimm, H., Guan, K., Gentine, P., Wu, J., Bernacchi, C.J., Sulman, B.N., Griffis, T.J., Lin, C., 2020. Redefining droughts for the US Corn Belt: The dominant role of atmospheric vapor pressure deficit over soil moisture in regulating stomatal behavior of maize and soybean. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 287, 107-930.
Lee, B.H., Henderson, D.A., Zhu, J.K., 2005. The Arabidopsis cold-responsive transcriptome and its regulation by ICE1. Plant Cell. 17, 3155-3175.
Leng, P., Zhao, J., 2020. Transcription factors as molecular switches to regulate drought adaptation in maize. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 133, 1455-1465.
Liu,  R., Liu,  M.,  Liu,  J.,  Chen,  Y.,  Chen,  Y., Lu,  C., 2010 Heterologus expression of an Ammopiptanthus mongolicuslate embryogenesis abundant protein gene (AmLEA) enhances Escherichia coli viability under cold and heat stress. Plant Growth Regulation. 60, 163-168.
Maghsoudi, K., Emam, Y., Niazi, A., Pessarakli, M., Arvin, M.J., 2018. P5CS expression level and proline accumulation in the sensitive and tolerant wheat cultivars under control and drought stress conditions in the presence/absence of silicon and salicylic acid. Journal of Plant Interactions. 13, 461-471.
Mi, N., Cai, F., Zhang, Y., Ji, R., Zhang, S., Wang, Y., 2018. Differential responses of maize yield to drought at vegetative and reproductive stages. Plant, Soil and Environment. 64, 260-267.
Miransari, M., Smith, D.L., 2014. Plant hormones and seed germination. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 99, 110-121.
Mohammadkhani, N., Heidari, R., 2007. Effects of water stress on respiration, photosynthetic pigments and water content in two maize cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 10, 4022–4028.
Mureiel, J., 1984. Free proline and reducing sugars accumulation in water stress. Anales del Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias. Serie Agricola. 29, 39-46
Nouri Azhar, J., Ehsanzadeh, P., 2007. Evaluation of Interrelationship of Growth Indices and Grain Yield of Five Maize Hybrids under Two Irrigation Regimes in Isfahan. JWSS-Isfahan University of Technology. 11, 261-273. [In Persian with English Summary].
Paleg, L., Spinal, D., 1981. The Physiology and Biochemistry of Drought Resistance in Plant. Academic Press. 89-101.
Poodineh, O., Keighobadi, M., Dehghan, S., Raoofi, M.M., 2014. Evaluation of intercropping system on weed management, forage quality available of nitrogen and resource use. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Science. 7, 1298-1303.
Ramzi, B., Morales, F., 1994. Chlorophyll flourescens as a possible tool for salinity tolerance screening in barley. Plant Physiology. 104, 667-673.
Roychoudhury,  A.,  Roy,  C., Sengupta,  D.N., 2007.Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing the heterologous LEA gene Rab16A from rice during high salt and water deficit display enhanced tolerance to salinity stress.  Plant Cell Reports. 26, 1839-1859.
Sallah, P.Y.K., Antwi, K.O., Ewool, M.B., 2002 Potential of elite maize composites for drought tolerance in stress and non-drought stress environments. African Crop Science Journal. 10, 1–9.
Seetseng, K.A., 2008. Effect of water application and plant density on canola (Brassica napus L.) in the free state. M.S. thesis, University of the Free State Bloemfontein. South Africa
Shaddad, M. A. K., Hamdia, A.S., Mohammed, H.T., 2011. Interactive effects of drought stress and phytohormones or polyamines on growth and yield of two m (Zea maize L.) genotypes. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2, 790-807.
Sharifi, P., Mohammadkhani, N., 2016. Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis factors in wheat genotypes during anthesis. Cereal Research Communications. 44, 229-239.
Shourbalal, S.K.S., Soleymani, A., Javanmard, H.R., 2019. Shortening vernalization in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using plant growth regulators and cold stratification. Journal of Cleaner Production. 219, 443-450.
Soleymani, A., Khajepour, M.R, Noormohammadi, G.H., Sadeghain, S.Y., 2002. Study of some physiological indicators affecting the growth of sugar beet under the influence of different planting dates and arrangements, Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9(1), 121-105. [In Persian with English Summary]
Tahaei, A., Soleymani, A., Shams, M., 2016. Seed germination of medicinal plant, fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill), as affected by different priming techniques. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 180, 26-40.
Tunnacliffe, A., Wise, M.J., 2007. The continuing conundrum of the LEA proteins. Naturwissenschaften. 94, 791-812.
Vinocur, B., Altman, A., 2005. Recent Advances in Engineering Plant Tolerance to Abiotic Stress: Achievements and Limitations. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 16, 123-132.
Wang, H., Yang, Z., Yu, Y., Chen, S., He, Z., Wang, Y., Jiang, L., Wang, G., Yang, C., Liu, B., Zhang, Z., 2017. Drought enhances nitrogen uptake and assimilation in maize roots. Agronomy Journal. 109, 39-46.
Yunlong, Z., 2007. Effects of water-deficit stress on the transcriptomes of developing immature and tassel in maize. Plant Cell Report. 26, 2137-2147
Zhang, Y., Hansen, N., Trout, T., Nielsen, D., Paustian, K., 2018. Modeling deficit irrigation of maize with the DayCent model. Agronomy Journal. 110, 1754-1764.