Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Horticulture and Crops Research Department, East Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Tabriz, Iran

2 East Azerbaijan Province Agricultural Jihad Organization, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is one of the most important forage crops and it produces high quality fodder for all types of livestock and alone can provide energy, protein, minerals and vitamins for livestock. Alfalfa is relatively sensitive to the salinity, but it has a high genetic diversity that can be used to select resistant cultivars. Therefore, the success of selection of alfalfa resistant cultivars requires exploitation of this genetic diversity that can produce more resistant plants to salinity compared to other forage plants, thus cultivar selection is important for alfalfa hay production. The aim of this project was to evaluate the tolerance of new alfalfa cultivars to salinity in field conditions.
Material and methods
This research was carried out in 2017 and 2020 at the Research Farm of East-Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Tabriz, Iran (Firuz Salar village located 4 km from Azarshahr city). In this study, two synthetic cultivars A and B along with a local ecotype as a control cultivar were compared in saline water and soil conditions. Synthetic A cultivar was selected from 11 ecotypes based on general combining ability test and evaluation of half-sib families, which eventually led to the production of Synthetic A cultivar. Synthetic cultivar B has been produced by selecting superior genotypes from five elite ecotypes. With polycross of selected genotypes in completely isolated conditions, synthetic cultivar B has been produced. Synthetic cultivars and common ecotype and local control were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The field was irrigated with saline water of the experimental area. Chlorophyll index, plant height, stem diameter, leaf area index, fresh and dry forage yield in each harvest and their annual total, leaf to stem ratio, protein content, digestibility, ADF, NDF, and the chlorophyll content a and b were measured.
Results and discusions
The results showed that there was a significant difference between the studied cultivars for all measured traits at the level of 1% probability and also the effect of harvest was significant for all traits except leaf to shoot ratio. The mean height in both synthetic cultivars A and B was higher than the control cultivar and both were in a statistical group. Similar results were observed for fresh and dry forage yield, leaf area index, stem diameter, leaf to shoot ratio and chlorophyll index and synthetic cultivars were superior to the control cultivar.
The average fresh forage yield of synthetic cultivars A and B in each harvest was 18.06 and 17.81 tons per hectare, respectively, which was significantly higher than the average fresh forage yield of the control cultivar (15.24 tons per hectare). For dry forage yield was quite similar and dry forage yield of synthetic cultivars was significantly higher than the control cultivar. Synthetic cultivars were superior to control cultivar in terms of chlorophyll content. It seems that improving the photosynthetic ability of these cultivars is one of the reasons for the high forage yield in these cultivars.
Conclusions
The results showed that there was a significant difference between the studied cultivars for all measured traits. The average fresh forage yield of synthetic cultivars A and B in each crop was 18.06 and 17.81 tons per hectare, respectively, which was significantly higher than the average fresh forage yield of the control cultivar (15.24 tons per hectare). For dry forage yield, quite similar results were obtained and the dry forage yield of synthetic cultivars was significantly higher than the control cultivar. The mean height in both synthetic cultivars A and B was higher than the control cultivar. On average, during the three years of the study, the third and second harvest produced the highest fresh forage yields. It seems the cultivars that have been modified for normal conditions also appear to be better under stress conditions. According to the total results obtained, synthetic cultivars have the necessary potential for cultivation under salinity conditions similar to the conditions of this study.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Al-Khatib, M., McNeilly, T., Collins, J., 1992. The potential of selection and breeding for improved salt tolerance in lucerne (Medicago sativa L.). Euphytica. 65, 43-51.
Allen, S., Dobrenz, A., Schonhorst, M., Stoner, J., 1985. Heritability of NaCl tolerance in germinating alfalfa seeds. Agronomy Journal. 77, 99-101.
Annicchiarico, P., Scotti, C., Carelli, M., Pecetti, L., 2010. Questions and avenues for lucerne improvement. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding. 46, 1-13.
Arnold, A.M., Cassida, K.A., Albrecht, K.A., Hall, M.H., Min, D., Xu, X., Orloff, S., Undersander, D.J., van Santen, E., Sulc, R.M., 2019. Multistate Evaluation of Reduced-Lignin Alfalfa Harvested at Different Intervals. Crop Science. 59, 1799-1807.
Assadian, N.W., Miyamoto, S., 1987. Salt Effects on Alfalfa Seedling Emergence 1. Agronomy Journal. 79, 710-714.
Association of official analytical chemists (AOAC). 2002. Official method of analysis (15th ed.). Arlington: AOAC.
Badran, A., ElSherebeny, E.A., Salama, Y., 2015. Performance of some alfalfa cultivars under salinity stress conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science. 7, 281.
Bernstein, L., Francois, L., 1973. Leaching requirement studies: sensitivity of alfalfa to salinity of irrigation and drainage waters. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 37, 931-943.
Blum, A., 2018. Plant Breeding for Stress Environments. CRC press.
Bradford, M.M., 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 72, 248-254.
Bresler, E., 1987. Application of a conceptual model to irrigation water requirement and salt tolerance of crops. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 51, 788-793.
Carpici, E.B., Celik, N., 2010. Determining possible relationships between yield and yield-related components in forage maize (Zea mays L.) using correlation and path analyses. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 38, 280-285.
Cornacchione, M.V., Suarez, D.L., 2017. Evaluation of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations’ response to salinity stress. Crop Science. 57, 137-150.
Johnson, D., Smith, S.E., Dobrenz, A., 1992. Genetic and phenotypic relationships in response to NaCl at different developmental stages in alfalfa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 83, 833-838.
Kapulnik, Y., Teuber, L., Phillips, D., 1989. Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) selected for vigor in a nonsaline environment maintained growth under salt stress. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 40, 1253-1259.
Kim, H., Jeong, H., Jeon, J., Bae, S., 2016. Effects of irrigation with saline water on crop growth and yield in greenhouse cultivation. Water. 8, 127.
Menke, K., Raab, L., Salewski, A., Steingass, H., Fritz, D., Schneider, W., 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 93, 217-222.
Milić, D., Katanski, S., Milošević, B., Živanov, D., 2019. Variety selection in intensive alfalfa cutting management. Ratarstvo i Povrtarstvo. 56, 20-25.
Min, D., 2016. Effects of cutting interval between harvests on dry matter yield and nutritive value in alfalfa. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 7, 1226.
Monirifar, H., 2016. Development and evaluationof a synthetic alfalfa variety for tolerance to salinity. Journal of Crop Breeding. 8, 176-182. [In Persian with English summary].
Monirifar, H., Barghi, M., 2009. Identification and selection for salt tolerance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) ecotypes via physiological traits. Notulae Scientia Biologicae. 1, 63-66.
Monirifar, H., Mazlomi, R., 2014. Repeated screening for selection of salt tolerant in Alfalfa Ecotypes. Journal of Crop Breeding. 6, 89-100. [In Persian with English summary].
Noble, C., Halloran, G., West, D., 1984. Identification and selection for salt tolerance in lucerne (Medicago sativa L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 35, 239-252.
Ozkose, A., 2018. Effect of environment× cultivar interaction on protein and mineral contents of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in Central Anatolia, Turkey. Sains Malaysiana. 47, 551-562.
Peel, M.D., Waldron, B.L., Jensen, K.B., Chatterton, N.J., Horton, H., Dudley, L.M., 2004. Screening for salinity tolerance in alfalfa. Crop science. 44, 2049-2053.
Shannon, M.C., 1984. Breeding, selection, and the genetics of salt tolerance. In: Staples, R.C., Toenniessen, G.H. (eds.), Salinity Tolerance in Plants - Strategies for Crop Improvement. pp 313–331. Wiley International, New York.
Soto-Zarazúa, M.G., Rodrigues, F., Pimentel, F.B., Bah, M., Oliveira, M.B.P., 2016. The isoflavone content of two new alfalfa-derived products for instant beverage preparation. Food and function. 7, 364-371.
Stavarache, M., Samuil, C., Popovici, C.I., Tarcau, D., Vantu, V., 2015. The productivity and quality of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in Romanian Forest Steppe. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 43, 179-185.
Tanji, K.K., Kielen, N.C., 2002. Agricultural drainage water management in arid and semi-arid areas. FAO.
Van-Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B., Lewis, B.A., 1991. Methods for dietary fiber neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 74, 3583-3597.
Wayu, S., Atsbha, T., 2019. Evaluation of dry matter yield, yield components and nutritive value of selected alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivars grown under Lowland Raya Valley, Northern Ethiopia.
Zhang, W.-J., Wang, T., 2015. Enhanced salt tolerance of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) by rstB gene transformation. Plant Science. 234, 110-118.