Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D Candidate, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Environmental Sciences Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

5 Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Introduction

Drought stress is one of the major risks to wheat production in many parts of the world. Due to its multidimensional effects, drought stress become a known concern for food security. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of drought stress on agronomic traits of wheat using meta-analysis. A large number of studies have been conducted worldwide regarding effect of drought stress on crops as a major risk in cereals production. The multi-dimentional effect of drought on agronomic traits of wheat are too complex to compare using traditional methods. Therefore, meta-analysis was used in the present study to identify general trends among numerous independent drought-related studies and combine the results into one measure known as the effect size. Meta-analysis of field trials data can provides an overall view of variables affecting crop traits and precision of experimental data. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of drought stress on agronomic traits and evaluating reliability of studies using meta-analysis.

Material and methods

Using scientific database of agronomic researches, 120 articles were evaluated to build a database of experimental data. The study synthesized results from 60 papers and published researches on drought effects and the database was built based on keywords such as wheat, drought stress, yield and agronomic traits. All studies that met the following criteria were included in the database: (1) available data of trial and control plots, (2) reported data of drought effect on at least one of five traits(yield, harvest index, biological yield, 1000-grain weight and grain per spike of wheat). The effect size for each datasets was calculated using cohen's index. Cohen's methodology applies differences between trial and control data as a measure of effect size. As a common measure in meta-analysis, Standard Mean Difference(SMD) used to evaluate precision and bias of experimental data of studies. I-squared measure used as estimation of heterogeneity for results of studies. An I-squared of less than 50% is usually viewed as low heterogeneity and over 50% as high heterogeneity.

Results and discussion

The results of analysis demonstrated that effect of drought stress on all mentioned agronomical traits is significant and negative. Using Cohen's index, the calculated effect size of drought stress on varies from 1.9248 to 4.4280 among traits. Grain yield had highest effect size and harvest index showed the lowest among all traits. Lower effect size in harvest index shows tolerance of the trait and it's relative sustainability during stress period.

Analysis of experiments showed a medium rate of heterogeneity in studies on grain yield, harvest index and biological yield and a higher heterogeneity in trials on 1000-grain weight and grain per spike.

Conclusion

Using meta-analysis in agronomic researches provides a framework to examine reliability and generalizability of experiments and individual studies. Drought stress affects many agronomic traits of wheat in different way in spite of statistical significance, results of many studies are not reliable and evident degrees of biases. Higher heterogeneity of experimental data shows a higher probability of bias and less trustable results in the examined researches and lower reliability of the sources for field application and generalization of the results.

Keywords

Main Subjects

 
Akbari Zarradkhaneh, S., Attari, M., 2016. Necessity of measuring and reporting effect size measures in psychological studies. Journal of Rooyesh-e- Ravanshenasi. 5(1), 29-46. [In Persian with English summary].
Broberg, M.C., Högy, P., Pleijel, H., 2017. CO2-induced changes in wheat grain composition: Meta-analysis and response functions. Agronomy. 7(2), 32-51.
Copas, J.B., Shi, J.Q., 2001. A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviews. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 10(1), 251-265.
Gallin, J.I., Ognibene, F.P., Johnson, L.L., 2017. Principles and Practice of Clinical Research, Fourth Edition (4th. ed.). Academic Press Inc., USA.
Gavaghan, D.J., Moore, R.A., McQuay, H.J., 2000. An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient data. Pain. 85(3), 415-424.
Ghorbani Zadeh, V., Hassan Nangir, S.T., 2014. Meta-analysis Application Guide With CMA-2 Software. Sociologists Publication. [In Persian].
Gurevitch, J., Koricheva, J., Nakagawa, S., Stewart, G., 2018. Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis. Nature. 555, 175-182.
Higgins, J.P.T., Thompson, S.G., 2002. Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis. Statistics in Medicine. 21, 1539-1558.
Higgins, J.P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J.J., Altman, D.G., 2003. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research ed.). 327(7414), 557-560.
Higgins J., Green, S., 2011. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org.
Jing, B., Baloch, S., 2020. Yield response of winter wheat (triticum aestivum L.) to water stress in northern China: A meta-analysis. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 18(1), 433-446.
Khaliliaqdam, N., Hasani, R., Mir Mahmoudi, T., 2018. Meta-analysis of some effective factors on wheat production in Iran. Crops Improvement. 20(1), 191-204. [In Persian with English summary].
Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Bakhshaie, S.,  Davari, A., 2017. A Meta-Analysis on Nitrogen Fertilizer Experiments on Cereal Crops in Iran. Agroecology. 9(2), 296-313. [In Persian with English summary].
Lipsey, M. W., Wilson, D. B. 2001. Practical    Meta-Analysis. Sage Publications, Inc.
Naseri, R., Vafa, P., Moradi, M. 2014. The effect of drought stress on grain yield, yield components and protein content of durum wheat cultivars in Ilam province, Iran. Biological, Veterinary, Agricultural and Food Engineering. 8, 619-624
Ried, K., 2006. Interpreting and understanding meta-analysis graphs--a practical guide. Australian Family Physician. 35(8), 635-638.
Rosenthal, R., Dematteo, M.R., 2001. Meta–analysis: Recent developments in Quantitative Methods for Literature Reviews. Annual Review of Psychology. 55, 59- 82.
Rothstein, H., Sutton, R., Alexander J., Borenstein, M., 2005. Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Soltani, E., Soltani, A., 2014. Necessity of using meta-analysis in field crops researches. Electronic Journal of Crop Production. 7(3), 203-216. [In Persian with English summary].
Sterne, J., Egger, M., 2001. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: Guidelines on choice of axis. Clinical Epidemiology. 54(10), 1046-1055.
Wilcox, J., Makowski, D., 2014. A meta-analysis of the predicted effects of climate change on wheat yields using simulation studies. Field Crops Research. 156, 180-190.
Yousofi-Azar, M., Rezai, A.M., 2007. Assessment of drought tolerance in different breeding lines of wheat (Tritcum aestivum L). Water and Soil Science (Journal of Science and Technology of Agricultural and Natural Resources). 11(42),113-121. [In Persian with English summary].
Zahoor A., Ejaz A.W., Sajjad A., Shazia A., Tanveer A., Wajid M., Osama B. A., Terence T., Maryke L., Muhammad R., 2018. Physiological responses of wheat to drought stress and its mitigation approaches. Acta Physiol Plant. 40(80),1–13.
Zhang, J., Zhang, S., Cheng, M., Jiang, H., Zhang, X., Peng, C., Lu, X., Zhang, M., Jin, J., 2018. Effect of Drought on Agronomic Traits of Rice and Wheat: A Meta-Analysis. Environmental Research and Public Health.15(5), 839-853.