Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 MSc Graduated, Dept. of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Yasouj, Iran

2 Assistant Prof., Dept. of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Yasouj, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Water shortage is the most important non-biological limiting factor for achieving the potential of crop yield. The millet is one of the drought-tolerant species that the study of its specific traits can help to identify the effective mechanisms of drought coping. Humic acid contains abundant elements that improve soil fertility and increase the availability of nutrients to plants, thus affect their growth and yield, but in the millet, humic acid function on increasing tolerance to drought is unclear.
 
Materials and methods
To evaluate the effect of humic acid foliar application on yield and yield components of millet under drought stress conditions, the experiment conducted in 2015 using a split-plot based on randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Irrigation regime considered as the main factor including two levels of normal irrigation and drought stress (irrigation cut off) at 50% flowering stage and sub-factors also included the foliar application of humic acid at five levels (1, 3, 5, 7% humic acid and pure water as control) in the Ramjeard region of Fars province.
 
Results and discussion
The results of this study showed that drought stress caused a significant decrease in the most morphological and physiological traits such as leaves chlorophyll content, the number of grain per spikes, 1000-grain weight, grain yield and harvest index but also humic acid has greatly controlled the effects of drought stress, then, ultimately the performance of treatments with humic acid was more than the control treatment. The remarkable point in this study was the process of changes in biochemical traits, that by increasing the percentage of humic acid, biochemical traits such as proline, superoxide dismutase and peroxidase enzyme decreased, these changes showing a positive effect of humic acid in reducing the effects of drought stress. As a result, the use of humic acid foliar application increased the leaves chlorophyll content, the number of spikes m-2, 1000-grain weight as well as grain yield, so that changes in 7% humic acid treatment were higher compared to the other treatments. The highest proline content was related to foliar application with water (control) under drought stress conditions, while the lowest proline content observed in 7% humic acid foliar application under normal irrigation conditions. The amount of superoxide dismutase under normal irrigation conditions was significantly lower than all drought stress treatments. Under drought stress conditions the highest rate was observed in foliar application with water (control), which could be confirmed by reducing the amount of superoxide dismutase as a result of using humic acid under stress conditions. The highest amount of peroxidase enzyme was observed in foliar application with water (control) under drought stress conditions. Generally, peroxidase content was significantly higher in drought stress treatments than in normal irrigation conditions. Under drought stress conditions, the highest chlorophyll a content was observed in the foliar application of 7% humic acid, similarly, the highest amount of chlorophyll b was observed in the foliar application of 7% humic acid, while there was no significant difference with foliar application of 5%. In this experiment, the number of grain per spikes affected by humic acid application and the interaction of drought stress and humic acid. Humic acid compensated for the negative effect of drought stress on the number of grain per spikes. Among drought stress treatments, using 7% humic acid increased the number of grain per spikes by 12% compared to control treatment. The comparison of two irrigation regimes showed the highest and lowest yield observation under normal irrigation and drought stress conditions, respectively. The yield under drought stress decreased by 56% compared to normal irrigation. Generally, we can conclude that even though drought stress significantly decreased the number of grains per spikes, 1000-grain weight and yield, but the variation trend of biochemical traits in drought stress treatments was significantly decreased proline, superoxide dismutase and peroxidase with increasing of the humic acid percentage, while the amount of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b increased.
 
Conclusions
It seems that humic acid can improve the morphological and physiological characteristics of the conventional millet in drought stress conditions. It seems that humic acid can play a role in improving biochemical and physiological characteristics of conventional millet under drought stress conditions, so that by reducing the effects of drought stress increased chlorophyll and ultimately improved the photosynthesis rate. Therefore, the yield and yield components of humic acid treatments were higher than foliar application with water (control).

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abedi, T., Pakniyat, H., 2010. Antioxidant enzyme changes in response to drought stress in ten cultivars of oilseed rape. Czech Journal Genetic and Plant Breeding. 46, 27-34.
Amini, Z., Hadad, R., Moradi, F., 2009. The effect of water deficit stress on antioxidant enzymes during generative growth stages in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Journal of Crop production and processing. 12(46), 65-74. [In Persian with English Summary].
Arnon, A.N., 1967. Method of chlorophyll in the plant. Agronomy Journal. 23, 112-121.
Astaraei, A.R., 2008. Effect of organic sources as foliar spray and root media on nutrition of cowpea plant. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science. 3, 352-356.
Beauchamp, C., Friderich, I., 1971. Superoxide desmutase; Improved assays and an assay applicable to acryl amide gels. Analytical Biochemistry. 44, 276-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8
Çakir, R., 2004. Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Research. 89, 1–16.
Chance, B., Maehly, A.C., 1955. Assay of Catalase and Peroxidase. Methods in Enzymology, 2, 764-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(55)02300-8
Conover, D. G., Sovonick, S.A., 1989. Influence of deficits on the water relations and growth of Echinochloa turneriana, Echinochloa crus-galli, and Pennisetum americanum. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. 16, 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9890291
Dalvand, M., Solgi, M., Khaleghi, A., 2018. Effects of foliar application of humic acid and drought stress on growth and physiological characteristics of marigold (Taget erecta). Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture. 2(34), 67-80. [In Persian with English Summary].
Daur, I., Bakhashwain, A., 2013. Effect of humic acid on growth and quality of maize fodder production. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 45, 21-25.
De Wet, J.M.J., 1986. Origin, evolution and systematics of minor cereals. In: Seetharam, A., Riley, K.W., Harinarayana, G. (Eds), Small Millets in Global Agriculture. Proceedings of the 1st International Small Millets Workshop Bangalore, India, October 29-November 2, 1986.
El-Bassiony, A., Fawzy, Z., Abd El-Baky, M., Asmaa, R., 2010. Response of snap bean plants to mineral fertilizers and humic acid application. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences. 6, 169-175.
Fischer, R.A., 2011. Wheat Physiology: a review of recent developmens. Philippine Agricultural Scientist. 62, 95-114. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP10344
Foulkes, M.J., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Weightman, R., Snape. J.W., 2007. Identifying physiological traits associated with improved drought resistance in winter wheat. Field Crops Research. 103, 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.04.007
Foyer, C.H., Falliwell, B., 1976. The presence of glutathione and glutathione reductase in chloroplasts: A proposed role in ascorbic acid metabolism. Planta. 133, 21-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386001
Gautam, R., Navaratna, D., Muthukumaran, S., Singh, A., More, N., 2021. Humic Substances: Its Toxicology, Chemistry and Biology Associated with Soil, Plants and Environment. pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98518
Gazaran, Y., Bazobandi, M., 2013. Examining the typical millet response (Panicum miliaceum. L.) to use Hymax manure under drought stress. Second National Conference on Sustainable Development of Agriculture and Environment, Iran. 2, 83-78. [In Persian].
Guttieri, M. J., Stark, J. C., Brien, K., Souza, E., 2006. Relative sensitivity of spring wheat grain yield and quality parameters to moisture deficit. Crop Science. 41, 327 -335.
Hanson, A.D., Hitz, W.D., 1982. Metabolic responses of mesophytes to plant water deficits. Annual Review of Plant Physiology. 33, 163-203. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.001115
Hayati, A., Ramroudi, M., Galavi, M., 2011. Effect of timing of potassium application on Millet (Setaria italica) yield and grain protein content in different irrigation regimes. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 1(2), 35- 44. [In Persian with English summary].
Lawlor, D.W., Cornic, G. 2002. Photosynthetic cabon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant, Cell and Environmen. 25, 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00814.x
Meloni, D.A., Oliva, M.A., Martinez, C.A., Cambraia, J., 2003. Photosynthesis and activity of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and glutathione reductase in cotton under salt stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 49, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(02)00058-8
Ober, E.S., Sharp, R.E., 2003. Electrophysiological responses of maize roots to low water potentials: relationship to growth and ABA accumulation. Journal of Experimental Botany. 54, 813-824. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg060
Paleg, L.G., Spinall, D., 1981. The Physiology and Biochemistry of Drought Resistance in Plant. Academic Press, New York, 240 p.
Paquin, R., Lechasseur, P., 1979. Observations sur une méthode de dosage de la proline libre dans les extraits de plantes. Canadian Journal of Botany. 57, 1851-1854. https://doi.org/10.1139/b79-233
Pareek, A., Sopory, S.K., Hans, J., Govindjee, B., 2009. Abiotic stress adaptation in plants, Physiological, Molecular and Genomic Foundation. Springer Press, 521 pages.
Pouresmaeel, P., Habibi, D., Tavassoli, A., Zahedi, H., Towhidi Moghadam, H., 2009. Effect of superabsorbent polymer on agronomic and physiological traits of different cultivars of red beans under drought stress in greenhouse conditions. Agricultural Research Journal. 1(2), 1-16. [In Persian with English summary].
Renu, K.C., Devarshi. S., 2007. Acclimation to drought stress generates oxidative stress tolerance in drought-resistant than susceptible wheat cultivar under field conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 60, 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.11.004
Safari f., 2007. Effect plant dating and density on forage yield of Panicum millaceum. MSc dissertation. Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Gorgan, Iran. [In Persian].
Saruhan, V., Kusvuran A., Babat. S., 2011. The effect of different humic acid fertilization on yield and yield components performance of common millet. Science Research and Essays. 6, 663-669. http://www.academicjournals.org/SRE
Sarvajeet. S.G., Narendra. T., 2010. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol and Biochem. 3, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016
Seghatoleslami, M.J., Majidi, E., Kafi, M., 2008. Effect of deficit irrigation on yield, WUE and some morphological and phenological traits of three millet species. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 40, 1555-1560.
Shah Hosseini, Z., Gholami, A., Asghari, H. 2012. The effect of Mykurzai symbiosis and application of humic acid on water use efficiency and physiological indices of corn growth under deficit irrigation conditions. Journal of Dry Ecosystem. 2, 57-39. [In Persian with English Summary].
Sio-Se Mardeh, A., Ahmadi, A., Poustini, K., Mohammadi, V., 2006. Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditions. Field Crops Research. 98, 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.02.001
Winkel, T., Payne, W., Renno, J.F., 2001. Ontogeny modifies the effects of water stress on stomatal control, leaf area duration and biomass partitioning of Pennisetum glaucum. New Phytologist. 149, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00008.x
Yadav, R., S. Gayadin., Jaiswal, A.K., 2001. Morpho-physiological changes and variable yield of wheat genotypes under moisture stress conditions. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 6, 390 –394.
Zhang, J.M., Xing, S.J., Sang, M.P., Ma, B.Y., Chu, X.M., Liu, C.S., 2010. Effect of Humic Acid on Poplar Physiology and Biochemistry Properties and Growth under Different Water Level. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 6, 200–203.