Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD candidate, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, Yazd Agricultural and Natural Resources and Education Center, AREEO, Yazd, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

5 Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding (Abureyhan), University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction

One of the crops that are considered as new sources of human nutrition as well as animal feed and poultry is the Amaranth. The leaves of most of the Amaranth species are used orally for human or animals use worldwide. According to the patterns of drought, irrigation management plays an important role in improving or enhancing crop yields, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. In this regard, identification of indices for tolerance and susceptibility to drought stress has always been of interest to researchers and it can be very effective. Many scientists have tried to find the best index for stress tolerance in plants. This study aimed to evaluate the best indices for determination of drought tolerance in forage Amaranth cultivars.

Materials and methods

Experimental research farm with a geographical position of 31 degrees 54 minutes north and 54 degrees 16 minutes west of 1215 meters above sea level is located in Yazd province. The tested cultivars were planted in plots of 40 m2 in two consecutive years (May 2018-19). The planting was done in a row, and immediately the first irrigation was done. Fertilization was done every two years according to soil analysis and plant requirement. Split-plot experiment based on a completely randomized block design with three replications was used for this study. The main factor, including four levels of water-deficit for the plant (50, 60, 70 and 80%) was considered. And Cim and Kharkovski, who all belong to the Amaranthus hypochondriacus family, constituted the sub-factor of the test. Parameters such as yield, agricultural water productivity, leaf-to-stem weight ratio, stem diameter, plant height and crude protein percentage were investigated. Then, using dry forage yield of the Amaranth, famous indices were used to calculate resistance and stability of drought stress. In this essay, SAS 9.4 software was used for data analysis of variance and Statgraphics 18 software was applied for drawing graphs and principal components analysis.

Results and discussion

Combine analysis was performed for two years on all traits. Interaction effects revealed that with increasing drought stress, fresh forage yield in Amaranth cultivars was significantly reduced, as Loura and Cim had the highest yield at 50% water depletion conditions, while Loura and Kharkovski cultivars at 80% of water discharge showed the lowest yield. Agricultural water productivity also yielded similar results. The ratio of leaf to stem weight in the interaction of treatments had no significant difference. But the diameter and height of stems decreased significantly with increasing drought stress levels in all cultivars, but this decrease was more pronounced in Kharkovski. Subsequently, the principal component analysis was performed to evaluate the genotypes. It was found that the Cim cultivar is the most resistant to high levels of drought stress.

Conclusions

The results showed that with increasing drought stress levels, fodder yield significantly decreased in different cultivars. But despite the decrease in the yield, it seems that due to the quality of the forage, the relatively favourable production volume per hectare and due to the short growing season of the plant, it can be a desirable option even in low water areas. Since one of the objectives of this research was to select the optimal stress index for selection of superior cultivar for drought tolerance, by analyzing the principal component, we found that the Hm and MP indices with the yield under stress and non-stress conditions were the most valuable. However, while the Loura genotype had a higher yield under non-stress and even mild drought conditions, the Cim cultivar showed significantly better yield under drought stress. And in terms of indices, Kharkovski could never perform better than Cim.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Adhikary, D., Khatri-Chhetri, U., Slaski, J., 2020. Amaranth: An Ancient and High-Quality Wholesome Crop. Nutritional Value of Amaranth. IntechOpen. pp. 57-66.
Bidinger, F., Mahalakshmi, V., Rao G., 1987. Assessment of drought resistance in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L. Leeke). II. Estimation of genotype response to stress. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 38, 49-59.
Bouslama, M., Schapaugh, W., 1984. Stress tolerance in soybeans. I. Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop science. 24(5), 933-937.
Caselato‐Sousa, V.M., Amaya‐Farfán, J., 2012. State of knowledge on amaranth grain: a comprehensive review. Journal of Food Science. 77, 93-104.
Cook, S., Gichuki, F., Turral, H., 2006. Water productivity: Estimation at plot, farm and basin scale. People and Agro-Ecosystems Research for Development Challenge; CIAT: Cali, Colombia.144.
Fazaeli. H., Ehsani. P., Safayee. AR., Mehrani, A., 2011. Amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) as a new forage source. p. 19-20.  In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference. Oct. 2011. Balkan Conference on Animal Science, Bucharest, Romania.
Fernandez, G.C., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. Proceeding of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, Aug. 13-16. Shanhua, Taiwan.
Fischer, R., Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 29, 897-912.
Gao, S., Wang, Y., Yu, S., Huang, Y., Liu, H., Chen, W., He, X., 2020. Effects of drought stress on growth, physiology and secondary metabolites of two adonis species in Northeast China. Scientia Horticulturae. 259, 108795.
Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campanile, R., Ricciardi, G., Borghi, B., 1997. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 77, 523-531.
Goodarzvand Chegini, Kh., Fotovat, R., Bihamta, M.R., Omidi, M., Shahnejant Boushehri, A., 2017. Grouping of tolerance indices and response of Kabuli and Desi type chickpea genotypes to drought stress. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 48, 647-664. [In Persian with English Summary].
Karami, S., Hadi, H., Tajbakhsh, SM., Modaress, S., 2018. Effect of different levels of nitrogen and zeolite on chlorophyll content, Quantity and quality of Amaranth forage under deficit irrigation stress. Journal of Crops Improvement. [In Persian with English Summary].
Kirkham, M., 2005. Field capacity, wilting point, available water, and the non-limiting water range. Principles of soil and plant water relations.101-115.
Kjeldahl, J., 1883. Neue methode zur bestimmung des stickstoffs in organischen körpern. Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie. 22, 366-382.
Nabhan G.P., 1986. Gathering the Desert. University of Arizona Press. USA.
Nakhoda, B., Hashemi-Dezfouli, A., Banisadr, N., 2000. Water stress effects on forage yield and quality of pearl millet. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 31, 701-712. [In Persian with English Summary].
Nouri, M.Z., Komatsu, S., 2013. Subcellular protein overexpression to develop abiotic stress tolerant plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 4: 2.
Peiretti, P.G., 2018. Amaranth in animal nutrition: A review. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 30(5). pp. 1-20.‏
Rahnama, A., Safaeie, AR., 2017. Performance comparison of three varieties of Amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.) at different harvest time. Journal of Asian Scientific Research. 7, 224-230.
Rahi AR, Najafi Zarrini H, Ranjbar G, Ghajar Spanlou M. 2020. Identification of drought tolerant genotypes of soybean plant using principal component analysis and cluster analysis. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 13, 27-40. [In Persian with English Summary].
Rosielle, A., Hamblin, J., 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment 1. Crop Science. 21, 943-946.
Sánchez-Reinoso, AD., Ligarreto-Moreno, GA., Restrepo-Díaz, H., 2020. Evaluation of drought indices to identify tolerant genotypes in common bean bush (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 19, 99-107.