Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 MS. Student of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Research Center for Plant Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

3 Professor, Faculty of Agriculture and Research Center for Plant Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is one of the important legume crops and Globally, after beans )Phaseolus spp(., chickpea is ranked as a second important legume crop (Roy et al., 2010). Chickpea is an important source of proteins for human consumption, especially in the developing countries where people cannot provide animal protein or vegetarian by choice (Zaccardelli et al., 2013). Chickpea plays an important role in the maintenance of soil fertility through nitrogen fixation (Roy et al., 2010). Plants are exposed to wide range of environmental stresses. In among, Salinity is one of the major abiotic stresses causing severe impact on crop production worldwide(Rasool et al., 2012).chickpea is a salt sensitive pulse crop and its yield is seriously affected mainly by salts (Turner et al., 2013). Salinity stress in chickpea adversely affects several morphological features and physiological processes like reduction in growth and ion balance, water status, photosynthesis, increase in hydrogen peroxide, which causes lipid per oxidation and consequently membrane injury. Also proline and carbohydrates are accumulated in plant tissue (Flowers et al., 2010; Ashraf and Harris, 2004). This study is designed to determine the effect of salt stress on physiological and biochemical parameters in chickpea genotypes exhibiting differences in salinity tolerance. The results of this study could provide information on potential physiological and biochemical parameters and could also provide deeper intelligence into tolerance mechanisms than the stresses caused by salinity.

Materials and methods
This experiment was conducted as split-plot based on randomized complete block design with three replications in 2018 at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. Salinity with two levels of 0.5 and 8 dSm-1 (NaCl) was considered as main plot and chickpea genotype (17 Kabuli-type genotypes) as sub-plot. The characteristics such as soluble carbohydrates, proline, osmotic potential, MDA, DPPH, relative water content, MSI%, were evaluated in 50% of flowering. At the end of the growing season, crop was harvested and seed yield were determined.

Results and discussion
The highest proline and carbohydrates content was observed in MCC65, MCC92 and MCC95 genotypes, and the lowest in MCC12 genotype. Result salinity stress caused increased 24, 19 and 19 % in the amount of osmotic potential, MDA and DPPH. Relative leaf water content and membrane stability was showen respectively 10 and 13 % reduction by use salinity stress. Survival percentage, number of branches and canopy height had reduction 6, 22 and 57. MCC65, MCC92 and MCC95 genotypes respectively by 0.183, 0.193 and 0.181 (Kg.m-2) had the highest seed yield and MCC98 and MCC298 had the lowest seed yield. The MCC65, MCC95 and MCC92 genotypes had superior traits, including performance in stress conditions compared to other genotypes, and on the other hand, the MCC98 and MCC298 genotypes had the lowest performance. Among 17 chickpea genotypes, the highest sodium content belonged to MCC95 genotype with 9.5 (mg.g.dw-1) weight and the lowest sodium MCC65 genotype with 5.8 (mg.g-1dw). MCC65 had the highest potassium in non-stress and MCC95 had the highest potassium in salinity stress.

Conclusions
The MCC65, MCC95 and MCC92 genotypes had superior traits, including performance in stress conditions compared to other genotypes, and on the other hand, the MCC98 and MCC298 genotypes had the lowest performance. Finally, further study in relation to the top three genotypes in salinity stress conditions is proposed to identify stress tolerance mechanisms as well as infrastructure as breeding programs.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abe, N., Murata, T. Hirota, A., 1998. Novel DPPH radical scavengers, bisorbicillinol and demethyltrichodimerol, from a fungus. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. 62, 661-666.
Ahmad, M.S.A., Ali, Q., Bashir, R., Javed, F., Alvi, A.K., 2006. Time course changes in ionic composition and total soluble carbohydrates in two barley cultivars at seedling stage under salt stress. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 38, 1457-1466.
Ashraf, M.P.J.C., Harris, P.J.C., 2004. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Science. 166, 3-16.
Bandeoğlu, E., Eyidoğan, F., Yücel, M., Öktem, H.A., 2004. Antioxidant responses of shoots and roots of lentil to NaCl-salinity stress. Plant Growth Regulation. 42, 69-77.
Batse, L.S., Waldren, R. P., Teare, I. D., 1973. Rapid determination of free Prolinee for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil. 39, 205-207.
Dharam, V., Kumar, A., Kumar, N., Kumar. M., 2018. Physiological responses of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)  genotypes to salinity stress. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 7, 2380-2388.
Dhingra, H.R., 2007. Salinity mediated changes in yield and nutritive value of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 12, 271-275.
Doraki, G.R., Zamani, G.R., Sayyari, M.H., 2016. Effect of salt stress on physiological traits and antioxidant enzymes activity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. cv. Azad). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 14, 470-483. [In Persian with English Summary].
Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.T., Smith, F., 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry. 28, 350-356.
FAO., 2016. Agriculture production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/ default. aspx.
Flowers, T.J., Gaur, P.M., Gowda, C.L., Krishnamurthy, L., Samineni, S., Siddique, K.H., Turner, N.C., Vadez, V.,
Heath, R.L., Packer, L., 1968. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplast I Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 125,189-198.
Hirich, A., Jelloul, A., Choukr-Allah, R., Jacobsen, S.E., 2014. Saline water irrigation of quinoa and chickpea: seedling rate, stomatal conductance and yield responses. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 200, 378-389.
Kafi, M., Bagheri, A., Nabati, J., Mehrjerdi, M.Z., Masomi, A., 2011. Effect of salinity on some physiological variables of 11 chickpea genotypes under hydroponic conditions. Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture, 1, 55-70. [In Persian with English Summary].
Kamel, M., El-Tayeb, M.A., 2004. K+/Na+ soil-plant interactions during low salt stress and their role in osmotic adjustment in faba beans. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 2, 257-265.
Kaur, P., Kaur, J., Kaur, S., Singh, S., Singh, I., 2014. Salinity induced physiological and biochemical changes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 6, 578-588.
Khan, H.A., Siddique, K.H., Colmer, T.D., 2017. Vegetative and reproductive growth of salt-stressed chickpea are carbon-limited: sucrose infusion at the reproductive stage improves salt tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 68, 2001-2011.
Khan, H.A., Siddique, K.H., Munir, R., Colmer, T.D., 2015. Salt sensitivity in chickpea: growth, photosynthesis, seed yield components and tissue ion regulation in contrasting genotypes. Journal of Plant Physiology. 182, 1-12.
Mann, A., Bishi S. K., Mahatma, M. K., Kumar, A., 2015. In: Managing Salt Tolerance in Plants. Molecular and Genomic Perspectives. (Wani S. H. and Hossain M.A. Eds.). Metabolomics and Salt Stress Tolerance in Plants. CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group. P: 252-262,
Meloni, D.A., Oliva, M.A., Ruiz, H.A., Martinez, C.A., 2001. Contribution of proline and inorganic solutes to osmotic adjustment in cotton under salt stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 24, 599-612.
Mian, A.A., Senadheera, P., Maathuis, F.J., 2011. Improving crop salt tolerance: anion and cation transporters as genetic engineering targets. Plant Stress. 5, 64-72.
Molassiotis, A., Sotiropoulos, T., Tanou, G., Diamantidis, G., Therios, I., 2006. Boron-induced oxidative damage and antioxidant and nucleolytic responses in shoot tips culture of the apple rootstock EM 9 (Malus domestica Borkh). Environmental and Experimental Botany. 56, 54-62.
Munns, R., Tester, M., 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 59, 651-681.
Nabati, J., 2010. Effect of salinity on physiological characteristics and qualitative and quantitative traits of forage Kochia (Kochia scoparia) (Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. Thesis. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Faculty of Agriculture). [In Persian].
Prado, F.E., Boero, C., Gallardo, M.R.A., González, J.A., 2000. Effect of NaCl on growth germination and soluble sugars content in Chenopodium quinoa Willd. seeds.
Rasool, S., Ahmad, A. and Siddiqi, T.O., 2012. Differential response of chickpea genotypes under salt stress. Journal of Functional and Environmental Botany, 2, pp.59-64.
Roy, F., Boye, J.I., Simpson, B.K., 2010. Bioactive proteins and peptides in pulse crops: Pea, chickpea and lentil. Food Research International. 43, 432-442.
Sairam, R. K., A. Tyagi., 2004. Physiology and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Current Science. 86, 407-421.
Samineni, S., Siddique, K.H., Gaur, P.M., Colmer, T.D., 2011. Salt sensitivity of the vegetative and reproductive stages in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): podding is a particularly sensitive stage. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 71, 260-268.
Smart, R.E., Bingham, G.E., 1974. Rapid estimates of relative water content. Plant Physiology, 53, 258-260.
Tandon, H.L.S. 1995. Methods of analysis of soils, plants, water andfertilizers. FDCO, New Delhi
Teimouria, A., Jafarib, M., Azarnivand, H. 2009. Effect of proline, soluble carbohydrates and water potential on resistance to salinity of three Salsola species (S.rigida, S. dendroides, S.richteri). Desert. 14, 15-20.
Turner, N.C., Colmer, T.D., Quealy, J., Pushpavalli, R., Krishnamurthy, L., Kaur, J., Singh, G., Siddique, K.H.,
Vadez, V., Krishnamurthy, L., Serraj, R., Gaur, P.M., Upadhyaya, H.D., Hoisington, D.A., Varshney, R.K., Turner, N.C., Siddique, K.H.M., 2007. Large variation in salinity tolerance in chickpea is explained by differences in sensitivity at the reproductive stage. Field Crops Research, 104, 123-129.
Vadez, V., Rashmi, M., Sindhu, K., Muralidharan, M., Pushpavalli, R., Turner, N.C., Krishnamurthy, L., Gaur, P.M., Colmer, T.D., 2012. Large number of flowers and tertiary branches, and higher reproductive success increase yields under salt stress in chickpea. European Journal of Agronomy. 41, 42-51.
Yin, Y.G., Kobayashi, Y., Sanuki, A., Kondo, S., Fukuda, N., Ezura, H., Sugaya, S., Matsukura, C., 2009. Salinity induces carbohydrate accumulation and sugar-regulated starch biosynthetic genes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv.‘Micro-Tom’) fruits in an ABA-and osmotic stress-independent manner. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61, 563-574.
Zaccardelli, M., Sonnante, G., Lupo, F., Piergiovanni, A.R., Laghetti, G., Sparvoli, F., Lioi, L., 2013. Characterization of Italian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm by multidisciplinary approach. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 60, 865-877.
Zhu, J.K., 2003. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 6, 441-445.