Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 MSc. Graduated, Plant Breeding and Biotechnology Department, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor in Plant Breeding and Biotechnology Department, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Horticulture Crops Research Department, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Gorgan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The existence of drought stress at the beginning of the growing season is one of the most important threatening factors in wheat production of Iran. The coleoptile length is the most important morphological trait in determining sowing depth, emergence power and seedling establishment. The coleoptile length has been used as an effective indicator for selecting the drought tolerant genotypes in wheat breeding programs. Various indices have been developed to evaluate crop response to various stresses, including tolerance index (TOL), productivity mean (MP), geometric mean productivity (GMP), harmonic mean (HM), stress tolerance index (STI), stress sensitivity index (SSI), yield index (YI), yield stability index (YSI) and relative stress index (RSI). The efficiency of each indices depends on the breeding objectives and the target environment.

Materials and methods
In order to evaluate some of the landrace wheat genotypes under drought stress conditions at the seedling stage, an experiment with 35 pure lines under three moisture conditions (control, drought stress with PEG6000 10% and 15%) was conducted in a completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications at Gorgan university of agricultural sciences and natural resources.. The coleoptile length was measured after eight days. The indices of MP, GMP, HM, STI, SSI, YI, TOL, RSI and YSI were calculated based on the coleoptile length values under control (Yp) and stress (Ys) conditions. Data analysis was performed using iPASTIC: an online toolkit to estimate plant abiotic stress indices.

Results and discussion
In control and 10%-drought stress conditions, genotypes 11 and 2 had the highest of coleoptile length. While, in 15%-drought stress conditions, genotypes 3 and 6 had the highest of coleoptile length, respectively. Also in control and 15%-drought conditions genotypes 30 and 35 and in 10%-drought stress conditions genotypes 15 and 21 had the lowest of coleoptile length. Based on MP, GMP, HM, STI and YI indices, genotypes 2 and 11 were identified as tolerant genotypes, while genotypes 15, 21 and 30 were susceptible genotypes, under 10% drought stress conditions. Under 15%-drought stress conditions, MP, GMP, HM, STI and YI indices identified genotypes 21 and 34 as the most susceptible genotypes, whereas genotypes 30 and 35 were the most susceptible genotypes. Under three moisture conditions, the coleoptile length had the highest coefficient of correlation (positive and significant) with MP, GMP, HM and STI indices. Using three-dimensional plots, the genotypes were divided into four groups A, B, C, and D. The most appropriate indices being the ability to distinguish group A, from other groups. Group A selects genotypes that have high yield in both control and stress conditions. The result showed genotypes 3, 6, 11, 16, 19, 20 and 24 were classified as group A in both drought stress conditions. The Iranian commercial cultivars (genotypes 30, 34 and 35) placed in Group D, which indicates insufficient attention to drought stress at the seedling stage, while tolerance to terminal drought stress is one of the most important goals in wheat breeding programs of Iran. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the first two PCAs explained 99.78% of the variation in 10%-drought stress and 99.80% in 15%-drought stress conditions. MP, GMP, HM and STI had the sharp angles with together that it indicates high correlation among mentioned indices. Multivariate biplos showed that drought tolerant genotypes were adjacent to vectors related to the best drought tolerance indices.

Conclusions
Correlation coefficients of drought tolerance indices showed that MP, GMP, HM and STI were the most suitable indices for selecting of drought tolerant genotypes. Based on stress tolerance indices and 3D plots, genotypes 3, 6, 11 and 24 (originated from Turkey, Afghanistan, Iran and Afghanistan, respectively) were identified as drought tolerant genotypes at the seedling stage, while genotypes 14, 15, 21, 30 and 35 were identified as the most susceptible genotypes. The landrace genotypes identified in this study could be used in breeding programs of bread wheat under drought stress at the seedling stage.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Amiri, R., Bahraminejad, S., Sasani, S., 2013. Evaluation of genetic diversity of bread wheat genotypes based on physiological traits in nonstress and terminal drought stress conditions. Cereal Research. 2, 289-305. [In Persian with English Summary].
Basafa, M., Taherian, M., 2010. Evaluation of drought tolerance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) ecotypes using drought tolerance indices. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 3, 69-81. [In Persian with English Summary].
Bidinger, F. R., V. Mahalakshmi, G., Rao, D., 1987. Assessment of drought resistance in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L. Leeke). II. Estimation of genotype response to stress. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 38, 49-59.
Bouslama, M., Schapaugh, W. T., 1984. Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science. 24, 933-937.
Darvishnia, F., Pahlevani, M., Zaynali Nezhad, K., Azizi, K., 2020. Analysis of grain yield and its attributes in bread wheat and their associations with coleoptile length under water deficit conditions', Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 13 41-56. [In Persian with English Summary].
Ellis, M.H., Rebetzke, G.j., Spielmeyer, W., Richards, R.A., Bonnett, D.G. 2004. Gibberellin responsiveness and early growth of alternative dwarfing genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Functional Plant Biology. 31, 583-589.
Farayedy, Y., 2004. Evaluation of drought tolerance in Kabuli chickpea genotypes. Iranian Journal of Agriculture. 6, 27-38. [In Persian].
Farshadfar. E., Amiri, R. 2017. Assessment of drought resistance in different bread wheat lines using agro-physiological traits and integrated selection index. Environmental Stresses in Crop Science. 11, 79-91. [In Persian with English Summary].
Fernandez, G. C. J., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In C. G. Kuo [ed.], Adaptation of food crops to temperature and water stress. 257-270.
Fischer, R. A., R. Maurer., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 29, 897-912.
Fischer, R. A., T. Wood., 1979. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars III. Yield association with morphological traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 30, 1001-1020.
Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M. R., Campaline, G., Ricciardi, G. L., Borghi, B., 1997. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 77, 523-531.
Golabadi, M., Arzani, A., Mirmohammadi Maibody, S.M. 2006. Assessment of drought tolerance in segregation population in drum wheat. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 1, 162-171.
Haddadin, M.F., 2015. Assessment of drought tolerant barley varieties under water stress. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 5, 131-137.
Huang, X.Q., Börner, A., Röder, M.S., Ganal, M.W., 2002. Assessing genetic diversity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm using microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet. 105, 699-707
Kargar, S.M.A., Ghannadha, M.R., Bozorgi-Pour, R., Atari, A.A., Babaei, H.R., 2004. Investigation of drought tolerance indices in some soybean genotypes under restricted irrigation condition. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science. 35, 97-111. [In Persian].
Matsui, T., Inanaga, S., Shimotashiro, T., An, P., Sugimoto, Y. 2002. Morphological characters related to varietal differences in tolerance to deep sowing in wheat. Plant Production Science. 5, 169-174.
Michel, B.E., Kaufmann, M.R. 1973. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant physiology. 51, 914-916.
Mohammadi, M., 2008. Study of the possibility of using synthetic wheat derivatives under warm and dry conditions. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 24, 487-500. [In Persian with English summary].
Mohan, A., Schillinger, W.F., Gill, K.S. 2013. Wheat seedling emergence from deep planting depths and its relationship with coleoptile length. PLoS One, 8(9).
Murri, S., Emam, Y., Surshojani, H., 2013. Evaluation of terminal drought tolerance in wheat using yield, yield components and quantitative indices of drought tolerance. Journal of environmental stress in Crop Science. 5, 19-32.
Naghavi, M.R., Moghadam, M., Toorchi, M., Shakiba, M.R. 2016. Evaluation of Spring Wheat Cultivars Based on Drought Resistance Indices. Journal of Crop Breeding. 8, 192-207.
Narayanan, S., Mohan, A., Gill, K.S., Prasad, P.V., 2014. Variability of root traits in spring wheat germplasm. PLoS One, 9(6).
Pour‐Aboughadareh, A., Yousefian, M., Moradkhani, H., Moghaddam Vahed, M., Poczai, P., Siddique, K.H., 2019. IPASTIC: An online toolkit to estimate plant abiotic stress indices. Applications in plant sciences. 7, p.e11278.
Rana, M.S., Hasan, M.A., Bahadur, M.M., Islam, M.R., 2017. Effect of poly ethylene glycol induced water stress on germination and seedling growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum). The Agriculturists. 15, 81-91.
Rebetzke, G.J., Richards, R.A. 2000. Gibberellic acid-sensitive dwarfing genes reduce plant height to increase kernel number and grain yield of wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 51, 235-245.
Rebetzke, G.J., Verbyla, A.P., Verbyla, K.L., Morell, M.K., Cavanagh, C.R. 2014. Use of a large multiparent wheat mapping population in genomic dissection of coleoptile and seedling growth. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 12, 219-230.
Reynolds, M.P., Mujeeb-Kazi, A., Sawkins, M. 2005. Prospects for utilising plant-adaptive mechanisms to improve wheat and other crops in drought- and salinity-prone environments. Annals of Applied Biology. 146, 239-259.
Rosielle, A. A., Hamblin, J., 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non‐stress environments. Crop Science. 21, 943-946.
Saba, J., Moghaddam, M., Ghassemi, M., Nishabouri, M.R., 2001.Genetic properties of drought resistance indices. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 3, 43-49.
Salarpour Gharba, F., Farahbakhsh, H., 2014. Effect of Salicylic Acid Drought Stress on Physiological and Physical Characteristics of Fennel. For agricultural purposes. 3, 765-778.
Shirazi, E., Fazeli-nasab, B., Ramshin. H.A., Fazel Najafabadi, M., Izadi darbandi, A., 2016. Evaluation of Drought Tolerance in wheat Genotypes under Drought Stress at Germination Stage. Journal of Crop Breeding. 8, 207-219. [In Persian with English Summary].
Shafazadeh, M.K., YazdanSepas, A., Amini, A., Ghanadha, M. R., 2004. Study of terminal drought tolerance in promising winter and facultative wheat genotypes using stress susceptibility and tolerance indices. Seed and Plant. 20, 57-71. [In Persian with English Summery].
Srivastava, J.P., Acevedo, E., Varma, S., 1987. Drought Tolerance in Winter Cereal. 2ed. John Wiley Pub., USA. 678 pp.
Sundari, T., Tohari, S., Mangoendidjojo, W., 2005. Yield performance and tolerance of mungbean genotypes to shading. Journal Pertanian. 12, 12-19.
Taghian, A.S., Abo-Elwafa, A., 2003. Multivariate and rapid analysis of drought tolerance in spring wheat. Assiut Journal of Agricultural Science. 34, 1-25.
Whan, B.R. 1995. The emergence of semidwarf and standard wheats, and its association with coleoptile length. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 16, 411-416.
Xing, S.C., Li, F., Guo, Q.F., Liu, D.R., Zhao, X.X., Wang, W. 2009. The involvement of an expansin geneTaEXPB23 from wheat in regulating plant cell growth. Biologia Plantarum. 53, 429-434.
Zebarjadi, A., Asgar, S., Najafi, A., Rezaiezad, A. 2016. Evaluation of drought tolerance of rapeseed genotypes using drought resistance indices. Environmental Stresses in Crop Science. 8, 345-348. [In Persian with English Summary].