Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD student in Plant Breeding, Department of Agriculture and Plant Breeding, Birjand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Birjand, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Agriculture and Plant Breeding, Birjand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Birjand, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Crop and Horticultural Research, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Ardebil, (Maghan) Iran

Abstract

Introduction‌
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is one of the most important crop plants in the world. Different indices have been introduced to determine stress tolerance, but in general, indices that are highly correlated with yield under both stress and non-stress conditions are considered as the best indices. Because these indices are capable of identifying high yield genotypes in both stress and non-stress environments, they can be used to estimate yield stability. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare different drought tolerance and susceptibility indices and group hybrids from potato cultivars in Ardabil province based on these indices.

Materials and methods
In order to study drought tolerance indices of 12 hybrids obtained from crossover of experimental potato cultivars in a randomized complete block design with three replications at two irrigation levels (100 and 65% of plant water requirement) in Zareh Agricultural Company greenhouse Gostar Arta was performed. The first year was for genetic variation, and the second year was for greenhouse cultivation. Drought tolerance indices were also calculated for the studied genotypes in order to determine the tolerance of cultivars to different water deficit conditions. The susceptibility and stress tolerance indices (GMP, MP, STI, SSI and TOL) were used to evaluate drought tolerance and drought resistance of potato genotypes.
Drought tolerance indices were calculated and after computing the indices, these indices were analyzed and compared with 100% and 65% water requirement using SPSS-22 software. Relationship between gland function in two environments and calculated tolerance indices were performed and three-dimensional graphs were plotted using SPSS-22 software. Minitab15 software was used for better evaluation of relationships by principal component analysis and biplot charts. Also, WARD method was used to select the desired hybrids for hybridization and the obtained results were obtained. A dendrogram chart form was provided. The dendrogram was plotted by Minitab15 software.

Results and discussion
Results of analysis of variance of yield under normal conditions and 65% water use and stress tolerance indices showed variation among 12 hybrids from crosses. Under normal conditions (100% plant water requirement) the highest yield of tuber with average of 53.55 ton /h belonged to R12 hybrid (♀Luca×Esprit♂). The highest tuber yield under drought stress conditions (65% plant water requirement) was observed in S13 (♂Luca×Esprit♀) and S14 (♂Luca × Esprit♀) hybrids with 34.41 and 35.47 ton / ha, respectively. In stress conditions (65% plant water requirement) the highest tuber yield and the highest harmonic mean, geometric mean yield and stress tolerance index belonged to hybrid R14 (♀Luca × Esprit♂). The results of correlation analysis showed tuber yield under normal and stress conditions (65% of available water) and drought tolerance index, Geometric mean productivity index and average productivity index are the most appropriate indices for determining potato-tolerant hybrids. Multivariate biplot charts showed that the two hybrids R14 (♀Luca × Esprit♂) and S13 (♂Luca × Esprit♀) were adjacent to vectors related to important drought tolerance indices namely productivity mean, geometric mean productivity And stress tolerance. Also distribution of hybrids in biplot showed genetic variation among hybrids relative to drought stress. Cluster analysis showed that the highest genetic distance was between R14 (♀Luca × Esprit♂) and R12 (♀Luca×Esprit♂) hybrids and S12 (♂Luca × Esprit♀) susceptible hybrids.

Conclusions
Based on the results, it can be concluded that the ability of separation of drought tolerant hybrids from potato cultivars by geometric mean productivity and average productivity index and tolerance index is more appropriate and two hybrids R14 and S13 can be used as stress tolerant hybrids.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Ahamadi, G., Zienali-Khaneghah, H., Rostamy, M.A., Chogan, R., 2000. The study of drought tolerance indices and biplot method in eight corn hybrids. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 31, 513-523. [In Persian with English summary].
Asadi-Chaleshtory, S., Hasanzadeh-Gorttapeh, A. Fayaz-Moghadam, A., 2006. Evaluation of drought tolerance index in lentil land rates of west Azarbayjan. Gorgan, Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resource. 13, 65-77. [In Persian with English summary].
Babazadeh, H., Sarai Tabrizi, M Homaee, M., 2017. Assessing and modifying macroscopic root water extraction basil (Ocimum Basilicum.) models under simultaneous water and salinity stresses. Soil Physics and Hydrology. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 81, 10–19.
Demelash, N., 2013. Deficit irrigation scheduling for potato production in North Gondar, Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 8, 1144-1154.
FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization)., 2019. FAOSTAT database for agriculture. Available online at: http://faostat3.fao.org/ faostat-gateway /go/to/download/Q/QC/E.
Farshadfar, E., Zamani, M., Motallebi, M., Immamjomeh, A., 2001. Selection for drought resistance in chickpea lines. Iranian Journal Agricultural Sciences. 32, 1. 65-77 [In Persian with English summary].
Fernandez, G.C., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. pp. 257-270. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress. Taiwan. 13-16 August.
Fischer, R.A., Maurer, R.., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I: grain yield response. Australian Journal Agricultural Research. 29, 897- 912.
Golestani, M., Pakniyat, H., 2007. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices in sesame lines. Journal of Water and Soil Science. 11, 141-150. 77 [In Persian with English summary].
Hassanpanah, D., Hassanabadi, H., 2011. Evaluating Tolerance of Potato Cultivars and Promising Clones to Water Deficit in Ardabil Region. Journal of Crop and Weed Ecophysiology. 4(4), 1-18. [In Persian with English summary].
Hassanpanah, D., 2009a. Effects of water deficit and potassium humate on tuber yield and yield component of potato cultivars in Ardabil region, Iranian Journal of Environmental Sciences. 3, 351-356. [In Persian with English summary].
Hassanpanah, D., 2009b. In vitro and in vivo screening of potato cultivars plantlets against water stress by polyethylene glycol and potassium humate. Biotechnology. 8, 132-137.
Hassanpanah, D., 2010. Evaluation of potato advanced cultivars against water deficit stress under in vitro and in vivo condition. Biotechnology. 92, 164-169.
Hassanpanah, D., 2014. Evaluation of genetic diversity for agronomic traits in 65 genotypes potato with the use of Factor and Cluster analysis. Journal of Crop EcoPhysiology. 8, 83-96. [In Persian with English summary].
Hassanpanah, D., 2014. Genetic Diversity of 65 Potato genotypes using factor and cluster analysis, Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 8, 96-83. [In Persian with English summary].
Hassanpanah, D., Hoseinzadeh, A.A., 2007. Methodology and evaluation of resistance sources to drought in potato cultivars and path analysis yield and yield components. Project final report, Natural Resources Research Center of Ardebil. Press Registration Number 86/1124. 56 pp. [In Persian].
Hassanpanah, D., Kazemi, M., Ahmad Mousapour Gorji, A., Jalali, A.H., 2018. A comprehensive guide to modern potato cultivation kazemi. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), 978-964-520-480-6. [In Persian].
Hassanpanah, D., Hoseinzadeh, H., Hosseinzadeh, A., Soheili, B., Mohammadi, R., 2016. Factor analysis, AMMI stability value parameter and GGE Bi-plot graphical method for quantitative and qualitative traits of potato genotypes. Ecophysiology of Crops. 37, 748-731. [In Persian with English summary].
Ilker, E., Tatar, Ö., Aykut Tonk, F., Tosun, M., 2011. Determination of tolerance level of some wheat genotypes to post-anthesis drought. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 16, 59-63.
Islami, M., Arzani, A. Meybodi, A.M., 2004. Evaluation of agronomic traits and inheritance ability their in tolerance to salty durum wheat genotypes in without stress field conditions. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 27, 101-112. [In Persian with English summary].
Jouyandeh Kelashemi, I., Hassanpanah, D., 2014. Evaluation of genetic diversity for yield and yield component in the hybrids produced from breeding population of HPS×II/67 potato. International Journal of Current Life Sciences. 4, 10107-10110.
Lan, J., 1998. Comparison of evaluating methods for agronomic drought resistance in crops. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occid Sinica 7, 85-87.
Ministry of Agricultural Jihad, 2018. Agricultural Statistics, Volume I: Crops in 2016-2017. Ministry of Jihad and Agriculture, Deputy of Planning and Economics, Bureau of Statistics and Information Technology, Ministry of Agricultural Jihad, Tehran [In Persian].
Naderi, A., Hashemi-Dezfouli, S.A., Majidi Hervan, E., Rezaei, A., Nourmohammadi, G., 2000. Study on correlation of traits and components affecting grain weight and determination of effects of some physiological parameters on grain yield in spring wheat genotypes under optimum and drought stress conditions. Journal of Seed and Plant Improvement 16, 374-386. [In Persian with English Summary].
Najafzadeh, S., Ehsanpour, A., 2012. Effect of drought stress on some physiological parameters of two potato cultivars (Kenebec and Concord) under in vitro culture condition. Arid Biome. 2, 70-81. [In Persian with English summary].
Nickmanesh, L., Hassanpanah, D., 2014. Evaluation of genetic diversity for agronomic traits in 127 potato hybrids with using multivariate statistical methods. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences. 4, 502-507.
Nouri, A., Nezami, A., Kafi, M., Hassanpanah D., 2016. Evaluation of Water Deficit Tolerance of 10 Potato Cultivars Based on some Physiological Traits and (Solanum tuberosum L.) Tuber Yield in Ardabil Region. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 10, 268-243. [In Persian with English summary].
Reddy, A.R., Chaitanya, K. V. Vivekanandan, M., 2004. Drought-induced responses of hotosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. Journal of Plant Physiology. 161, 1189-1202.
Rosielle, A., Hamblin A.J., 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for stress and non-stress environment. Crop Science. 21, 1441- 1446.
Shahriari, R., Hassanpanah, D., Salimi, F., Manafian, M., Parchebaf, A., 2009. Potato mini-tuber production in water deficit condition using polyethylene glycol 6000. 6th Biotech. National Cong. Islamic Republic of Iran. 1-5 pp. [In Persian].
Shiri, M., Valizadeh, M., Majidi Haravan, E., Sanjari, A., Gharib Eshghi, A., 2010. Evaluation of wheat tolerance indices to moisture stress condition. Crop Production (Electronic Journal of Crop Production). 3, 143-161. [In Persian with English summary].
Yahoueian, S.H., Ghannadha, M.R., Babaie, H.R., Habibi, D., 2006. Evaluation of soybean genotypes in drought stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding. 2, 57-72. [In Persian with English summary].
Yousofi-Azar, M. Rezai, A.M., 2007.Assessment of drought tolerance in different breeding lines of wheat (Triticum. aestivum L). Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources.42, 11.113-121.
Zakerhamidi, S., Hassanpanah, D., 2014. Investigation of genetic diversity for quantitative traits in 166 potato hybrids of produced from Luca and Caesar cultivars crosses. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences. 3, 34-37.
Zheng, J., Su, H., Lin, R., 2019. Isolation and characterization of an atypical LEA gene (IPLEA) from Ipomoea pes-aprae conferring salt/drought and oxidative stress tolerance. Scintific Reports 9, 14838. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50813-w.