Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Department of Water Engineering, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Water Engineering, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Water Engineering, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

Abstract

Introduction

In the presence of environmental stresses such as salinity and fertility stresses, water and nutrients less absorbed by the plant. Despite the stresses of salinity and nitrogen deficiency (fertility stress), the determination of the actual water requirement of plants with the AquaCrop model, will be important. Therefore, the aim of this research was to evaluate the AquaCrop model for estimating the soil moisture, evapotranspiration and yield of maize, under the salinity and fertility stresses.

Materials and methods

In this research, two treatments of water salinity and nitrogen deficity in four levels and three replications, with a control plot, were implemented as a factorial experiment in a randomized complete of block design. The studied plant was maize with cultivar of 704 Sc and was planted in plots with dimensions of 3 × 3 meters and 1.5 meters apart. In this plan, fertility stress was in the form of nitrogen fertilizer consumption and at four levels. Treatments of N_0، N_1، N_2 and N_3consisted of consumption of 100, 75, 50 and 25% of nitrogen fertilizer based on fertilizer recommendation, respectively. Salinity stress has been applied by irrigation of the plant with saline water. Water salinity treatments were selected based on yield potential of maize at four levels of 100, 90, 75 and 50% (3). According to the above four performance levels, treatments of S_0، S_1، S_2 and S_3 were included; irrigation water with electric conductivity of 0.5, 1.2, 3.5 and 7.5 (ds/m) respectively. Determining the irrigation time, was the same as the moisture content reached the RAW (Readily Available Water) level. Between the two irrigation intervals, the stomatal resistance of maize leaf, was measured by the AP4 prometer device. At the same time as increasing stomatal resistance, RAW was calculated and plots were irrigated. In the days of between two irrigation, was measured the soil moisture content of the plots at the depth of root development. The daily evapotranspiration of the plant, was calculated based on the amount of daily water depletion. For optimal calibration of parameters in the AquaCrop model, was used the method of Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE). Among 16 treatments, 8 treatments were randomly selected for calibration and the rest were selected for validation.

Results and discussion

Results were obtained for evaluating the AquaCrop model at the validation stage. The root mean square error (RMSE) of soil moisture simulation, varied from 1.43 to 2.6%. The normalized error value (NRMSE) ranged from 4 to 6 percent. The AquaCrop model showed a similar trend in the evapotranspiration simulation. The root mean square error (RMSE) of evapotranspiration simulation, varied from 1.85 to 2.35 mm. The normalized error value (NRMSE) ranged from 3.5 to 4.5 percent. For yield simulation, RMSE was 0.34 ton. ha-1 and NRMSE was 0.65%. The value of the R^2, EF, and d statistics showed a good correlation between the data and the optimal efficiency of the modeling. Therefore, the results showed that the performance of the model was good in estimating the parameters.

Conclusions

Evaluating the capability of the models is a great help to the agricultural sector planners, in estimation the parameters. In this research, evaluated the estimation of soil moisture content, evapotranspiration and yield of maize, under salinity and fertility stresses with AquaCrop model. The purpose of the model calibration was to nearing the simulated data to the real data (measured in the region). The obtained amounts for NRMSE and R^2 were less than 10% and greater than 0.9, respectively, which indicated the optimal performance of the model in this regard.

Keywords

Ahmadi, S.H., Mosallaeepour, E., Kamgar-Haghighi, A.K., Sepaskhah, A.R., 2015. Modeling maize yield and soil water content with AquaCrop under full and deficit irrigation managements. Water Resources Management. 29, 2837-2853.
Abedinpour, M., Sarangi, A., Rajput, T.B.S., Singh, M., Pathak, H., Ahmad, T., 2012. Performance evaluation of AquaCrop model for maize crop in a semi-arid environment. Agricultural Water Management. 110, 55-66.
Akumaga, U., Tarhule, A., Yusuf, A.A., 2017. Validation and testing of the FAO AquaCrop model under different levels of nitrogen fertilizer on rainfed maize in Nigeria, West Africa. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 232, 225–234.
Alizadeh, H. A., Nazari, B., Parsinejad. M., Ramezani Etedali, H., Janbaz, H. R., 2010. Evaluation of AquaCrop Model on Wheat Deficit Irrigation in Karaj area. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage. 4(2), 273-283. [In Persian with English Summary].
Alizade, A., 2007. Design of Surface Irrigation Systems. Publication of Imam Reza University, Mashhad, Iran. [In Persian].
Anjum Iqbal, M., Shen, Y., Stricevic, R., Pei, H., Sun, H., Amiri, E., Penas, A., Rio, S., 2014. Evaluation of the FAO AquaCrop model for winter wheat on the north china plain under deficit irrigation from field experiment to regional yield simulation. Agricultural Water Management. 135, 61-72.
Babazadeh, H., Sarai Tabrizi, M., 2012. Assessment of AquaCrop Model under Soybean Deficit Irrigation Management Conditions. Water and Soil. 26(2), 329-339. [In Persian with English Summary].
Farahani, H.J., Izzi, G., Oweis, T.Y., 2009. Parameterization and evaluation of the Aquacrop model for full and deficit irrigated cotton. Agronomy Journal. 101, 469–476.
Farooq, M., Hussain, M., Wakeel, A., Kadambot, H.M., 2015. Salt stress in maize: effects, resistance mechanisms, and management. Institute National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA). 35, 461-481.
Ghorbanian Kurd Abadi, M., Liaghat, A.M., Vatankhah, E., Noory, H., 2015. Simulation of yield and evapotranpiration of forage maize using AquaCrop model. Water and soil conservation. 4(2), 47-63. [In Persian with English Summary].
Geerts, S., Raes, D., 2010. Using AquaCrop to derive deficit irrigation schedules. Agricultural Water Management. 98, 213-216
Hasanli, M., Afrasiab, P., Ebrahimian, H., 2015. Field assessment and performance of SALTMED and AquaCrop models in the alternative irrigation management with saline and fresh water. Water and Soil Research in Agriculture. 46(3), 487-498. [In Persian with English Summary].
Heng, L.k., Hsiao, T.C., Evett, S., Howell, T., Steduto, P., 2009. Validating the FAO AquaCrop Model for Irrigated and Water Deficient Field Maize. Agronomy. 101.3, 488-498.
Heydarinia, M., Boroomandnasab, S., Naseri, A. A., Albaji, M., 2017. Evaluation of AquaCrop Model in estimation of maize yield and soil salinity under conditions of different agricultural management and irrigation with saline water. Iran Water and Soil Research. 48(1), 50-61. [In Persian with English Summary].
Jamieson, P. D., Porter, J. R., Wilson, D. R., 1991. A test of computer simulation model ARCWHEAT1 on wheat crops grown in New Zealand. Field Crops Research. 27, 337-350.
Khalili, N., Davary, K., Alizadeh, A., Kafi, M., Ansari, H., 2014. Simulation of Rainfed Wheat Yield using AquaCrop Model, Case Study: Sisab Rainfed Researches Station, Northern Khorasan. Water and Soil.28(5), 930- 939. ([In Persian with English Summary].
Khorsand, A., Verdinejad, V. R., Shahidi, A., 2014. Evaluating the performance of Aqua Crop model in predicting of wheat yield, moisture and salinity of soil profile under salt stress and irrigation deficiency. Water and Irrigation Management. 4(1), 89-104. [In Persian with English Summary].
Lacerda, C.F., Ferreira, J.F.S., Liu, X., Suarez, D.L., 2016. Evapotranspiration as a Criterion to Estimate Nitrogen Requirement of Maize under Salt Stress. Agronomy and Crop Science. 202, 192-202.
Meban, V.J., Day, R.L., Hamlett, J.M., Watson J.E., Roth, G.W., 2013. Validating the FAO AquaCrop model for rain fed maize in Pennsylvania. Agronomy Journal. 105, 419- 427.
Mohammadi, M., Mohammadi Ghaleney, M., Ebrahimi, K., 2011. Time and local variations of groundwater quality in Qazvin plain. Iranian Water Research. 5(8), 41-52. [In Persian with English Summary].
Ranjbar, A., Rahimikhoob, A., Ebrahimian, H., 2017. Evaluating Semi-Quantitative Approach of the AquaCrop Model for Simulating Maize Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage. 11(2), 286-298. [In Persian with English Summary].
Rudnick, D. R., Irmak, S., Djaman, K., Sharma, V., 2017. Impact of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer rate on soil water trends and maize evapotranspiration during the vegetative and reproductive periods. Agricultural Water Management. 191, 77–84.
Sepaskhah, A.R., Bazrafshan- Jahromi, A.R., Shirmohammadi- Aliakbarkhani, Z., 2006. Development and Evaluation of a Model for Yield Production of Wheat, Maize and Sugarbeet under Water and Salt Stresses. Biosystems Engineering. 93(2), 139–152.
Stockle, C.O., Martin, S.A., Campbell, G.S., 1994. CropSyst, a Cropping System Simulation Model: Water/ Nitrogen Budgets and Crop Yield. Agricultural Systems. 46, 335–359.
Stricevic, R., Dzeletovic, Z., Djurovic, N., Cosic, M., 2014. Global change biology bioenergy. 12206.
Van-Gaelen, H., Tsegay, A., Delbecque, N., Shrestha, N., Garcia, M., Fajardo, H., Miranda, R., Vanuytrecht, E., Abrha, B., Diels, J., Raes, D., 2014. A semi-quantitative approach for modelling crop response to soil fertility: evaluation of the Aqua crop procedure. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 153(7), 1218-1233.
Xin, H., Peiling, Y., Shumei, R., Yankai, L., Guangyu, J., Lianhao, L., 2016. Quantitative response of oil sunflower yield to evapotranspiration and soil salinity with saline water irrigation. Agricultural and Biological Engineering. 9(2), 63-73.
Ziayee, G., Babazadeh, H., Abbasi, F., Kaveh, F., 2015. Investigating the performance of AquaCrop and CERES-Maize models to estimating the components of soil water balance and maize yield. Iran Water and Soil Research. 45(4), 435-445. [In Persian with English Summary].