Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Higher Educational Complex of Saravan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Lack of water resources and drought stress is one of the most important characteristics of arid areas. Therefore, selecting the resistant plant and appropriate irrigation method is the best approach to manage water resources in these areas. Furthermore, lentil (Lens culinaris Med) as a cold spring legume is one of the most suitable plant under these conditions. The deficit irrigation method is one of the most important options for decreasing water losses and maximize water use efficiency in arid areas. However, the purpose of this study was evaluation of managing drought stress using deficit irrigation and its effect on lentil production and water use efficiency in climatic condition of Saravan.
Materials and methods
For evaluation of deficit irrigation on lentil production a split plot experiment based on a randomized complete block design with four replications was conducted in the Agricultural Research Station, Higher Educational Complex of Saravan during the growing season of 2018-2019. Main plots were including four levels of irrigation (60, 80, 100 and 120%). Sub plots were two lentil landraces (Baluchestan and Kurdestan). Planting was done on November 30. Moreover, irrigation was carried out in control (full irrigation) whenever 35% of allowed water depletion was extracted at soil depth of 20 cm. At each irrigation interval, the soil moisture was returned to the field capacity point at depth of 60 cm. The amount of deficit moisture content of different layers of soil was calculated from the following equation:
MDControl= (Ɵ‌FC‌- Ɵ10cm) + (Ɵ‌FC‌- Ɵ20cm) +…..+ (Ɵ‌FC‌- Ɵ60cm) (1)
In this equation, MD was the amount of moisture deficiency based on mm, ƟFC was the volumetric moisture content of the soil in the field capacity of the field and Ɵ 10cm, 20cm, 30cm, 40cm, 50cm and 60cm were the volume of soil moisture at a depth of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 cm, respectively.
The amount of irrigation water for each plot in the control treatment was calculated based on the following equation:
IControl= MDControl × A (2)
In the equation of 2, I was the amount of irrigation water based on liter, MD was the amount of moisture deficiency (mm) calculated in equation 1 and A plot area (m2).
Deficit irrigation was done at the same time as the control treatment, but irrigation was carried out at each irrigation interval according to different levels of deficit irrigation (60, 80).
The amount of water at different levels of deficit irrigation was calculated as follows:
I Deficit irrigation at 80 percentage= IControl ×0.80
I Deficit irrigation at 60 percentage= IControl ×0.60

Results and discussions
Overall, the results showed that the effect of deficit irrigation on grain yield, biological yield, harvest index, number of pods and seed per plant and water use efficiency was significant. The highest grain yield was obtained for Baluchestan cultivar in 120 and 100% water requirement with 680 and 643 kg ha-1, respectively. Furthermore, the highest harvest index was obtained in Baluchestan cultivar and 80% water treatment (0.24) treatments. Although, Baluchestan cultivar and 80% water requirement treatments encountered with 10% reduction in grain yield compared to 100% water requirement, its biological yield decreased 27% compared to 100% water requirement, which eventually led to an increase in harvest index. On the other hand, the greatest water use efficiency was observed in Balochistan cultivar and 80% water requirement treatment with 2.9 kg ha-1 mm-1. Although the yield of 80% water requirement was 58 kg ha-1 less than 100% water requirement, but its water use efficiency was 0.3 kg ha-1 mm-1 more than 100% water requirement.

Conclusions
Therefore, given that the area is considered as arid area, it is possible by reducing irrigation water and allocating it to critical stages especially flowering and pod filling stages and also other crops improve grain yield and the water use efficiency.

Keywords

 
Amiri Deh-Ahmadi, S.R., Parsa, M., Bannayan, M., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Deihimfard, R., 2015. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer levels on yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Mashhad climatic conditions. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research. 6, 66-77. [In Persian with English Summary].
Esmaeili, M., Farhadi Bansouleh, B., Ghobadi, M., 2015. Effects of deficit irrigation and quality of soybean crop yield in Kermanshah region. Journal of Water and Soil. 29, 551-559. [In Persian with English Summery].
Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D., Basra, S.M.A., 2009. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 29, 185-212.
Fereres, E., Soriano, M.A., 2007. Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. Journal of Experimental Botany. 58, 147-159.
Geerts, S., Raes, D., 2009. Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas. Agricultural Water Management. 96, 1275-1284.
Ghorbani-Nasrabadi, G.H., Hezarjaribi, A., 2010. Cotton response to deficit irrigation during different growth stages. Journal of Plant Production. 17, 129-142. [In Persian with English Summery].
Gusmao, M., Siddique, K.H.M., Flower, K., Nesbitt, H., Veneklaas, E.J., 2012. Water Deficit during the Reproductive Period of Grass Pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) Reduced Grain Yield but Maintained Seed Size. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 198, 430-441.
Haghiabi, A., 2007. Effect of deficit irrigation on soybean yield in Khorramabad. Ninth National Seminar on Irrigation and Evapotranspiration. Kerman. [In Persian].
Hosseini, F., Nezami, A., Parsa, M., Haj Mohamadnia, K., 2011. Effects of supplementary irrigation on yield and yield components of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) landraces in Mashhad climate. Iranian Journal of Water and Soil. 25, 625-633. [In Persian with English Summary].
Huffaker, R., Hamilton, J., 2007. Conflict: Irrigation of Agricultural Crops. ASA-CSSA-SSSA publishing. Madison.
Iranian Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad, 2015. Agricultural Statistic. Volume 2: Crops. Ministry of Jahad-e-Agriculture. Planning and economic affairs, Office of Statistics and Information Technology. [In Persian].
Karimzadeh, H., Nezami, A., Kafi, M., Tadayon, M.R., 2017. Effect of deficit irrigation on yield and yield component of pinto bean genotypes in Shahrekord. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research. 8, 113-126.
Karrou, M., Oweis, T., 2012. Water and land productivities of wheat and food legumes with deficit supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Journal of Agricultural Water Management. 107, 94–103.
Oweis T., Hachum A., Pala M., 2004. Lentil production under supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Water Management. 68, 251-265.
Ramirez Builes, V. H., Porch, T. G., Harmsen, E.W., 2011. Genotypic differences in water use efficiency of common bean under drought stress. Agronomy Journal. 103, 1206-1215.
Sandhu, J.S., Singh, S., 2007. History and origin. In: Yadav S.S. (eds.), Lentil: An ancient crop for modern times. Springer Verlag Germany pp. 1-9.
Saremi, M., Farhadi, B., Maleki, A., Farasati, M., 2015. Effect of deficit irrigation on yield and yield component and water use efficiency of lentil in Khorramabad. Journal of plant production. 22, 337-342. [In Persian].
SAS Institute, 2001. SAS System, Eighth ed. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
Shrestha, R., Turner, N.C., Siddique, K.H.M., Turner, D.W., Speijers, J., 2006. A water deficit during pod development in lentils reduces flower and pod numbers but not seed size. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 57, 427–438.
Zang, H., Pala, M., Oweis, Y., Harris, H., 2000. Water use and water use effieiency of chickpea and lentil in a Mediterranean environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 51, 295-304.