Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Master's degree Student, Agro-ecology Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Darab, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Agro-Ecology Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Darab, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Agro-Ecology Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Darab, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Grain yield of cereals significantly affects by assimilate remobilization in arid zones. Many factors including N fertilizer application affects assimilate remobilization in cereals (Ercoli et al., 2008). Many researches have been done aboat the effects of chemical N fertilizer under normal and water stress conditions on assimilate remobilization in arid environments (Ercoli et al., 2008; Barati and Ghadiri, 2017; Bahrani and Tahmasbi-sarvestani, 2006). However, the effects of other N sources such as crop ressidues and N fixing bacteria alone or in combination with chemical N fertilizers on assimilate remobilization and consequently grain yield was very scarce specially in arid zones. Therefore, there are two main questions; 1. Can using of Azospirillum brasilense as a N fixing bacteria instead of chemical N fertilizers or in combination with them in bio-agriculture boost the assimilate remobilization and consequently grain yield of barley under water stress conditions?, and 2. Can applying plant residues increase Azospirilum activity and consequently increase assimilate remobilization and grain yield in dry areas by improving water storage capacity or another mechanisms? For answering the above questions, the effects of application of N fixing bacteria (Azospirillum brasilense) and wheat residues on dry matter remobilization and barley yield under water stress after anthesis stage was evaluated in an arid zone of Southern Iran (Fars province).

Materials and methods
This research was conducted at the experimental farm of the Darab Agricultural College of Shiraz University. A split factorial experiment in a randomized complete block design with three replications were carried out in 2017 - 2018 growing season. Treatments included: two levels of irrigation as the main plots [normal irrigation (IRN): irrigation based on the plant's water requirement up to the physiological maturity and another factor was deficit irrigation (IRDI): irrigation based on the plant's water requirement up to the anthesis stage (cutting of irrigation after anthesis)]. Also, sub plots were two levels of wheat residues [1. without residue, 2. returning 30% of wheat residues to soil] and four fertilizer sources [N0, no nitrogen fertilizer (control); N100, 100 kg N ha-1; Bio + N50, Biofertilizer (Azospirillum brasilense) + 50 kg N ha-1 and Bio, Biofertilizer (Azospirillum brasilense)]. Finally, at the anthesis stage, dry matter of shoot samples were measured. Also, at the end of growing season, grain yield, dry matter of vegetative parts of shoot were measured. Then, assimilate remobilization, assimilate remobilization efficiency and contribution of pre-anthesis assimilate to grain were calculated by Ercoli et al., 2008 methods. Data were analyzed using SAS 9.1 software (SAS Institute, 2004).

Results and discussion
Overall, combined N fertilizer (Bio + N50) significantly increased grain yield (53%) in normal irrigation. Similarly, the grain yield was improved up to 12% under water stress conditions by Bio + N50. Water stress increased assimilate remobilization and contribution of pre-anthesis assimilate to grain in Bio + N50 treatment by 37 % and 148%, respectively, as compared with the normal irrigation treatment. The application of plant residues decreased the amount of assimilate remobilization, assimilate remobilization efficiency and contribution of pre-anthesis assimilate to grain in all fertilizer treatments. However, it did not significantly affect the grain yield.

Conclusion
Generally, considering the economic aspects and moving towards the sustainable agriculture, using of combined N fertilizer [Biofertilizer (Azospirillum brasilense) + 50 kg N ha-1] in optimal irrigation conditions is recommended for farmers of Southern Iran. Furthermore, if cutting of irrigation after anthesis is considered because of irrigation water resource shortage, this fertilizer regime is recommended as compared with the other N sources due to the significant increase in assimilate remobilization (37%) and contribution of pre-anthesis assimilate to grain (148%) and lower grain yield reduction as compared with the normal irrigation conditions.

Keywords

Abdul-Jaleel, C., Manivannan, P., Sankar, B., Kishorekumar, A., Gopi, R., Somasundaram, R., Panneerselvam, R., 2007. Pseudomonasfluorescens enhances biomass yield and ajmalicine production in Catharanthus roseus under water deficit stress. Colloids And Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 60(1), 7-11.
Alizadeh, A., 1999. Soil-Water-Plant Relationship. Emam Reza University, Mashhad, Iran. [In Persian].
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. Guide lines for computing crop water requirements (Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56) Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
Amoo-Aghaie, R., Mostajeran, A., Emtiazi, G., 2004. Effect of Azospirillum bacteria on some growth parameters and yield of three wheat cultivars. Journal of Water and Soil Science. 7(2), 127-138. [In Persian with English Summary].
Bahrani A., Tahmasbi-sarvestani Z.A.A., 2006. Effects of rate and time of nitrogen fertilizer on yield, yield component, and dry matter remobilization efficiency in two winter wheat cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 12(2), 369-377. [In Persian with English Summary].
Bahrani, A., Hamedi, S., Tadayon, M.S., 2013. Response of wheat and barley to nitrogen and drought stress. Plant Ecophysiology. 5, 1-14. [In Persian with English Summary]
Bahrani, A., Heidari-Sharif-Abad, H., Tahmasebi-Savestani, Z., Moafpourian, G.H., Ayenehband, A., 2009. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) response to nitrogen and post-anthesis water deficit. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science. 6(2), 231-239.
Barati, V., Ghadiri, H., 2017. Assimilate and nitrogen remobilization of six-rowed and two-rowed winter barley under drought stress at different nitrogen fertilization. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 63(6), 841-855.
Barati, V., Ghadiri, H., 2016. Effects of drought stress and nitrogen fertilizer on yield, yield components and protein content of two barley cultivars. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 20, 191-206. [In Persian with English Summary].
Barati, V., Ghadiri, H., Zand-Parsa, Sh., Karimian, N., 2015. Nitrogen and water use efficiencies and yield response of barley cultivars under different irrigation and nitrogen regimes in a semi-arid Mediterranean climate. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 6, 15-32.
Bijanzadeh, E., Emam, Y., 2012. Evaluation of assimilate remobilization and yield of wheat cultivars under different irrigation regimes in an arid climate. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 58(11), 1243-1259.
Bijanzadeh, E., Naderi, R., 2015. Remobilization efficiency and photosynthetic characteristics of five barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars under terminal drought stress. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 61(8), 1199-1210.
Bonnett, GD., Incoll, LD., 1992. The potential pre-anthesis and post-anthesis contributions of stem internodes to grain yield in crops of winter barley. Annals of Botany. 69, 219-225.
Compant, S., Van Der Heijden, M.G., Sessitsch, A., 2010. Climate change effects on beneficial plant–microorganism interactions. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 73, 97-214.
Cox C.M., Qualset C.O., Rains D.W., 1985. Genetic variation for nitrogen assimilation and translocation in wheat. I. Dry matter and nitrogen accumulation. Crop Scince. 25(3), 430-435.
Ebrahimpour, F., Eidizadeh, Kh., Mahdavi-Damghani, A., Rezvani, M., 2011. Effects of Biofertilizer application method with integrated chemical fertilizers on maize production and some chemical characteristics of soil. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 10(1), 240- 246. [In Persian with English Summary].
Emam, Y., Niknejhad, M. 2011. An Introduction to the Physiology of Crop Yield. Shiraz University Press. [In Persian].
Ercoli, L., Lulli, L., Mariotti, M., Masoni, A., Arduini, I., 2008. Post-anthesis dry matter and nitrogen dynamics in durum wheat as affected by nitrogen supply and soil water availability. European Journal of Agronomy. 28(2), 138-147.
Fallah-heravi, A., Abbasdukht, H., Zare-feizabadi, A., Gholami, A., 2015. Effects of conventional and conservation tillage with management residue on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) physiological properties. Iranian Journal of Filed Crop Science. 47, 277-289. [In Persian with English Summary].
Gallagher, J.N., Biscoe, P.V., Scott, R.K., 1975. Barley and its environment. V. Stability of grain weight. Journal of Applied Ecology. 12, 319-336.
Grimes, D., Yamada, H., Hughes, S., 1987. Climate-normalized cotton leaf water potentials for irrigation scheduling. Agricultural Water Management. 12, 293-304.
Hadi, H., Babaei, N., Daneshian, J., Arzanesh, M., Hamidi, A., 2012. Investigating the effect of Azospirillum lipophorum on sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) seedling properties that was achieved from sunflower fields under low irrigation conditions. Journal of Agroecology. 3(3), 320-327. [In Persian with English Summary].
Hamidi, A., Chookan, R., Asghar-Zadeh, A., Dehghan-Shoar, M., Ghalavand, A., Malakouti, M., 2011. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on dry matter partitioning of late maturing maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 41(4), 665-675. [In Persian with English Summary].
Hanson, B., Schwankl, L., Fulton, A. 2004. Scheduling Irrigation: When and How Much Water to Apply. Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Hojati-pour, I., Jafari-haghighi, B., Dorostkar, M., 2014. The effect of integration of biological and chemical fertilizers on yield, yield components and growth indexes of wheat. Journal of Ecophysiology. 15, 36-48. [In Persian with English Summary].
Institute S., 2004. SAS/GRAPH 9.1 Reference. SAS Institute.
Kasim, W.A., Gaafar, R.M., Abou-Ali, R.M., Omar, M.N., Hewait, H.M., 2016. Effect of biofilm forming plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on salinity tolerance in barley. Annals of Agricultural Sciences. 61(2), 217-227.
Keshavarz-nezhad, A. Kazemini, S.A.R., Bahrani, M.J., 2012. Effect of different nitrogen rates and residues of corn, rapeseed, sunflower and wheat crops on yeild and nitrogen use efficiency in wheat. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 10, 181-190. [In Persian with English Summary].
Khamadi, F., Mesgarbashi, M., Hosaibi, P., Enaiat, N., Farzaneh, M., 2015. The effect of crop residue and nitrogen fertilizer levels on soil biological properties and nitrogen indices and redistribution of dry matter in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Applied Field Crops Research. 28, 149-157. [In Persian with English Summary].
Kheiri-zadeh, Y., Seyed Sharifi, R., Khalilzadeh, R., 2018. Study of biofertilizers and nano zinc oxide application on remobilization and leaf area index of triticale (Triticosecale Witt.) under soil salinity. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 11, 993-1004. [In Persian with English Summary].
Kirda, C., Derici, M.R., Schepers, J. S., 2001. Yield response and N-fertiliser recovery of rainfed wheat growing in the Mediterranean region. Field Crops Research. 71(2), 113-122.
Marulanda, A., Barea, J.M., Azcón, R., 2009. Stimulation of plant growth and drought tolerance by native microorganisms (AM fungi and bacteria) from dry environments: mechanisms related to bacterial effectiveness. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 28(2), 115-124.
Pazaki, A., 2017. Effects of humic acid and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) on yield and yield components of durum wheat under drought stress condition in Shahr-e-Rey region. Cereal Research. 6, 105- 117. [In Persian with English Summary].
Perveen, S., Khan, M.S., Zaidi, A., 2002. Effect of rhizospheric microorganisms on growth and yield of green gram (Phaseolus radiatus L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 72, 421-423.
Poehlman, J.M. 1985. Adaptation and distribution. In: Rasmussen, D.C. (ed.), Barley, American society of Agronomy, Madison.
Sadeghi, H., 2007. Effects of crop residue and nitrogen rate on morpho-physiological traits, yield and yield components of two dry land wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shiraz, Iran. [In Persian with English Summary].
Sadeghi, H., Bahrani, M.J., 2009. Effects of crop residue and nitrogen rates on yield and yield components of two dryland wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Plant Production Science. 12, 497-502.
Sadeghi, H., Kazemeini, S.A.R., 2015. Effect of crop residue management and nitrogen fertilizer on grain yield and yield components of two barley cultivars under dryland conditions. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 13(3), 436-451. [In Persian with English Summary].
Sarig, S., Blum, A., Okon, Y., 1988. Improvement of the water status and yield of field-grown grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) by inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 110, 271-277.
Sharifi, R., Heidari, M.S., 2015. Effects of biofertilizers on growth indices and contribution of dry matter remobilization in wheat grain yield. Journal of Plant Researches. 28(2), 326- 343. [In Persian with English Summary]
Sohrabi, S. S., Fateh, E., Aynehband, A. Rahnama, A., 2014. Evaluation the effect of the residue management and different nitrogen sources on acumulation and remobilization of wheat stem reserve. Journal of Crop Production. 7(2), 113- 134. [In Persian with English Summary].
Somasegaran, P., Hoben, H.J., 2012. Handbook for rhizobia: Methods In Legume-Rhizobium Technology. Springer Science and Business Media, University of Hawaii, New York, USA.
Tale, A., Haddad, R., 2011. Study of silicon effects on antioxidant enzyme activities and osmotic adjustment of wheat under drought stress. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding. 47, 17-27.
Tambussi, E.A., Bort, J., Araus, J.L., 2007. Water use efficiency in C3 cereals under Mediterranean conditions: a review of physiological aspects. Annals of Applied Biology. 150(3), 307-321.
Torbert, H.A., Potter, K.N., Hoffman, D.W., Gerik, T.J., Richardson, C., 2000. Surface residue and soil moisture affect fertilizer loss in simulated runoff on a heavy clay soil. Agronomy Journal. 91, 606-612.
Van Herwaarden, A., Farquhar, G., Angus, J., Richards, R., Howe, G., 1998. 'Haying-off', the negative grain yield response of dryland wheat to nitrogen fertilizer. I. Biomass, grain yield, and water use. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 49, 1067-1082.
Wani, P. A., Khan, M. S., Zaidi, A., 2007. Synergistic effects of the inoculation with nitrogen‐fixing and phosphate‐solubilizing rhizobacteria on the performance of field‐grown chickpea. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 170(2), 283-287.
Yasari, E., Patwardhan A.M., 2007. Effect of Aztobacter and Azospirillum inoculations and chemical fertilizers on growth and productivity of canola (Brassica napus L.). Asian Journal Plant Sciences. 6(1), 77-82.
Zadoks, J.C., Chang, T.T., Konzak, C.F., 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research. 14, 415-421.