Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Former M.Sc. Student, Department of Production Engineering and Plant Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan,, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Production Engineering and Plant Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Academic Member of Irrigation, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

4 Ph.D. Student, Department of Production Engineering and Plant Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is one of the most important food sources of human. It has a high nutritional value due to its protein, vitamins and fiber supply. Abiotic stresses are most important limiting factors to crop productivity that among these, drought stress is known to be the main limiting factor of bean production in worldwide. The bean has a low tolerance to water stress, while about 60% of the bean crop is obtained in areas under low water stress. It has been reported that about 25% reduction of yield bean is due to drought stress conditions. The use of modern irrigation methods in addition raise grain yield, because saves of water consumption.
Materials and methods
In order to investigate the effect of different irrigation regimes on gas exchanges and agronomy traits related to yield in bean, a field experiment was carried out at the Research Farm of the Faculty of Agriculture, Zanjan University, Zanjan, Iran (36410N, 48290E) in spring 2012 years. The experiment was conducted at complete randomized block design with four replications. Experimental treatments included five level of irrigation (Traditional Irrigation with 100 % supply water requirement (I1), drip tape irrigation with 100 (I2), 80 (I3), 60 (I4) and 40 % (I5) supply water requirement. Each plot consisted of four rows, each measuring six meter long, distance of each rows and plants was 50 and 10 cm, respectively. Crop Evapotranspiration (ETc) of bean determined through calculation the evapotranspiration of the refrence crop (ETo) evaluated by FAO-Penman-Montith method and Crop Evapotranspiration (ETc) of plant. For of photosynthesis and other gas exchange parameters use IRGA Lci meter. At the physiological maturity stage, plants in an area of 1 m2 to measuring of  length of plant, number pod in plan, number seed in  pod, weight of thousand seeds, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index (HI) were harvested, then all aboveground dry matter were determined.
 
 
 
Results and discussion
The irrigation regimes have significant effect all traits investigate except plant length and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci). Reducing the amount of available water had adverse effects on the yield and yield components. The maximum of Stomatal conductance to water vapour (gs) observed in I1 and net CO2 assimilation rate (ACO2), mesophyll conductance (gm) in I1 and I2 treatment. The intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) was not affected by the irrigation regimes. The maximum of grain yield (945.6 kg/h), number of  pod in plant (10.95) and harvest index (23.87 %) observed in I2 treatment and  the highest of stomatal conductance to water vapour (gs) with 0.43 mmol.m-2s-1 was in I1 treatment. There was no difference in other traits investigate between I1 and I2 treatments. The intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) not significant in different irrigation regimes. The grain yield, number of pod in plant and harvest index in I2 treatment was more than I1 treatment to the amount 31.29, 59 and 18.93 percent, respectively.
Conclusions
According to this study, results showed that the physiological and agronomical traits that affected the growth and development of common bean disturbed whit reducing the available water content and ultimately the yield reduced. Since the no significant difference between more eco-physiological traits, in order to reducing of water consumption, suggested that in the field of bean culture, instead of traditional (leakage) irrigation, to use from of drip irrigation method with 100 percent supply water requirement. Result showed that the use of drip tape irrigation with 100 % water requirement was better than traditional irrigation with 100 percent supply water requirement, because in addition raise grain yield, cause saves of water consumption and reduces of hardness of work in farm conditions.

Keywords

Agricultural Statistics. 2013. Iranian Ministry of Agriculture Press. 167p. [In Persian].
Alizadeh, A. 2007. Irrigation Systems Design. (2 Edition Revised), Imam Reza University Publication. 138 pages. [In Persian].
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Fao, Rome, 300, p.D05109.
Anyia, A.O., and H. Herzog. 2004. Water use efficiency, leaf area and leaf gas exchange of cowpeas under mid-season drought. European Journal of Agronomy. 20, 327-339.
Boroujerdnia, M., Bihamta, M., AlamiSaid, K., Abdossi, V. 2016. Effect of drought tension on proline content, soluble carbohydrates, electrolytes leakage and relative water content of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Crop Physiology. 8, 23-41. [In Persian with English Summary].
Bota, J., Flexas, J., Medrano, H., 2004. Is photosynthesis limited by decreased Rubisco activity and RuBP content under progressive water stress? New Phytolgist. 162, 671-681.
Builes, V.H., Porch, T.G., Harmsen, E.W., 2011. Genotypic differences in water use efficiency of common bean under drought stress. Agronomy Journal. 103, 1206-1215.
Clavel, D., Drame, N.K., Roy-Macauley, H., Braconnier, S., Laffray, D., 2005. Analysis of early responses to drought associated with field drought adaptation in four Sahelian groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars. Environmental and    Experimental Botany. 54, 219-230.
Davoodi, S.H., Rahemi-Karizaki, A., Nakhzari-Moghadam, A., Gholamalipour Alamdari, E., 2018. The effect of deficit irrigation on yield and physiological traits of bean cultivars. Plant Production Technology. 18, 83-95. [In Persian with English Summary].
Dursum, A., 2007. Variability, Heritability and Correlation Studies in Bean Genotypes. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 3, 12-16.
Emadi, N., Balouchi, H.R., Jahanbin, Sh., 2012. Effect of drought stress and plant density on yield, yield components and some morphological characters of pinto bean (cv. C.O.S16) in Yasouj region. Journal of Crop Production. 5, 1-17. [In Persian with English Summary].
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2018. FAOSTAT data. Food and Agriculture Organization. http://faostat. fao.org.
Figueiredo, M.V.B., Burity, H.A., Martı´nez, C.R., Chanway, C.P. 2008. Alleviation of drought stress in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by co-inoculation with Paenibacillus polymyxa and Rhizobium Tropical Applied Soil Ecology. 40, 182–188.
German, C., Teran, H., 2006. Selection for drought resistance in dry bean landraces and cultivars. Crop Science. 46, 2111-2120.
Ghanbari, A.A., 2013. Investigation of developmental stages and phenology of common bean genotypes under normal irrigation and water defcit condition. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh and Sazandegi). 107, 190-199. [In Persian with English Summary].
Hirayama, M., Wada, Y., Nemoto, H., 2006. Estimation of drough tolerance based on leaf temperature in upland rice breeding. Breeding Science, 56, 47-54.
Hu, Y.Y., Zhang, Y.L., Yi, X.P., Zhan, D.X., Luo, H.H., Chow, W.S., Zhang, W.F., 2013. The relative contribution of non-foliar organs of cotton to yield and related physiological characteristics under water deficit. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 13, 975-989.
Karam, F., Lahoud, R., Masaad, R., Kabalan, R., Breidi, J., Chalita, C., Rouphael, Y., 2007. Evapotranspiration, seed yield and water use efciency of drip irrigated sunflower under full and defcit irrigation conditions. Agricalture Water Management. 90, 213-223.
Karimzadeh, H., Nezami, A., Kafi, M., Tadayon, M.R., 2017. Effects of deficit irrigation on yield and yield components of pinto bean genotypes in Shahrekord. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research. 8, 113-126. [In Persian with English Summary].
Keller, J., Bliesner, R.D., 1990. Sprinkler and Trickle Irrigation. Van Nostrand Reinhold,
New York.
Khaghani, Sh., Bihamta, M.R., Rahim, F., Dorry, H.R., Khaghani, S., 2008. Study of quantitative and qualitative traits in red bean in non-stress and drought conditions. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 7, 563-568.
Mafakheri, A., Sio-Semardeh, A., Bahramnejad, B., Struik, P.C., Sohrabi, Y., 2010. Effect of drought stress on yield, proline and chlorophyll contents in three chickpea cultivars. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 4, 580-585.
Mitchell, R.A.C., Mitchell, V.J., Lawlor, D.W., 2001. Response of wheat canopy CO2 and water gas-exchange to soil water content under ambient and elevated CO2. Global Change Biology. 7, 599-611.
Mohammad Zadeh, A., Majnun Hoseini, N., Moghadam, H., Akbari, M., 2012. Effect of drought stress and nitrogen fertilizer levels on physiological characteristics of two red kidney bean genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 14(3), 294-307. [In Persian with English Summary].
Mohammadi, M., Tavakoli, A., Pouryousef, M., Mohseni Fard, E., 2018. The Effect of Epibrassinolide on Growth and Seed Yield of Bean under optimal irrigation and drought stress conditions. Journal of Agricultural Crops Production, 20, 595-608. [In Persian with English Summary].
Munoz-Perea, C.G., Teran, H., Allen, R.G., Wright, J.L., Westermann, D.T., Singh, S.P., 2006. Selection for drought resistance in dry bean landraces and cultivars. Crop Science, 46, 2111-2120.
Porch, T.G., Ramirez, V.H., Santana, D., Harmsen, E.W., 2009. Evaluation of common bean for drought tolerance in Juana Diaz, Puerto Rico. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 195, 328-334.
Rahbarian, R., Khavari-nejad, R., Ganjeali, A., Bagheri, A.R., Najafi, F., 2011. Drought stress effects on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and water. Acta Biological Cracoviensa Botanica. 53, 47-56.
Ratnayaka, H.H., Kincaid, D., 2005. Gas exchange and leaf ultrastructure tinnevelly senna, Cassia angustifulia, under drought and nitrogen stress. Crop Science. 45, 840-847.
Ritchie, S.W., Nguyen, H.T., Holaday, A.S., 1990. Leaf water content and gas-exchange parameters of two wheat genotypes differing in drought resistance. Crop Science. 30, 105-111.
Roohi, E., Siosemardeh, A., 2008. Study on gas exchange in different wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under moisture stress conditions. Journal of Seedling and Seed. 24, 45 -62. [In Persian with English Summary].
Rosales, M.A., Ocampo, E., Rodríguez-Valentín, R., Olvera-Carrillo, Y., Acosta-Gallegos, J., Covarrubias, A.A., 2012. Physiological analysis of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars uncovers characteristics related to terminal drought resistance. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 56, 24-34.
Sabzi, S., Tahmasebi, Z., Barari, M., 2017. Study of the yield and some important plant of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes at different moisture levels. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 10, 21-30. [In Persian with English Summary].
Sadat Rasti Sani, M., Lahouti, M., Ganjeali, A., 1014. Effect of drought stress on some morphophysiological traits and chlorophyll fluorescence of red bean seedlings (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Iranian Journal of Pulses Research. 5, 103-116. [In Persian with English Summary].
Sadat Rasti Sani, M., Lahouti, M., Ganjeali, A., 2014. Effect of drought stress on some morphophysiological traits and chlorophyll fluorescence of red bean seedlings (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Iranian Journal of Pulses Research. 5, 103-116. [In Persian with English Summary].
Sadeghipour, O., 2009. Effect of deficit irrigation on physiologic and agronomic traits in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 11, 25-39. [In Persian with English Summary].
Shahbaz, K., Munir, A.H., Mu, J.X., 2009. Water management and crop production for food security in China: a review. Agricultural Water Management. 96, 349–360.
Shekari, F., Pakmehr, A., Rastgoo, M., Vazayefi, M., Goreishi Nasab, M.J., 2010. Effect of salicylic acid seed priming on some physiological traits of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) under water deficit at podding stage. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 4, 13-30. [In Persian with English Summary].
Sikuku P.A., Netondo, G.W., Onyango, J.C., Musyimi, D.M., 2010. Effects of water deficit on physiology and morphology of three varieties of NERICA rainfed rice (Oryza sativa L.). ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. 5, 23-28.
Simsek, M., Comlekcioglu, N., Ozturk, I., 2011. The effects of the regulated deficit irrigation on yield and some yield components of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under semi-arid conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology. 10, 4057-4064.
Sinaki, J.M., Heravan, E.M., Raad, A.H.S., Noormohammadi G., Zarei, G., 2007. The effects of water deficit during growth stages of Canola (Brassica napus L.). American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. 24, 417-422. [In Persian with English Summary].
Siosemardeh, A., Ahmadi, A., Poustini, K., Ebrahimzadeh, H., 2003. Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations to photosynthesis and their relationship with drought resistance in wheat cultivars. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science. 34, 93-106. [In Persian with English Summary].
Zadehbagheri, M., 2015. Effect of drought on grain yield and some physiological characteristics of red bean genotypes. Iranian Journal of Plant Ecophysiology. 6, 1-11. [In Persian with English Summary].
Souza, G.M., de Tarso Aidar, S., Giaveno, C.D., de Oliveira, R.F., 2003. Drought stability in different common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 3(3), 203-208.
Szilagyi, L., 2003. Influence of drought on seed yield components in common bean. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology, (Special Issue): 320-330.
Terán, H., Singh, S.P., 2002. Comparison of sources and lines selected for drought resistance in common bean. Crop Science. 42, 64-70.
Vaezirad, S., Shekari, F., Shiranirad, A.H., Zangani E., 2008. Effect of water stress at different growth stages on yield and yield components of kidney bean cultivars. Agroecology Journal. 10, 85-94. [In Persian with English Summary].
Yadav, R.S., Bhushan, C., 2001. Effect of moisture stress on growth and yield in rice genotype. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2, 104-107.
Zabet, M., Hosein zade, A.H., Ahmadi, A., Khialparast, F., 2003. Effect of water stress on different traits and determination of the best water stress index in mung bean (Vigna radiata). Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science. 34, 889-898. [In Persian with English Summary].
Zou, G.H., Liu, H.Y., Mei, H.W., Liu, G.L., Yu, X.Q., Li, M.S., Wu, J.H., Chen, L., Luo. L.J., 2007. Screening for drought resistance of rice recombinant inbred populations in the field. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 49, 1508-1516.