Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD student, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Faculty member, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Salinity is a major abiotic stress limiting growth and productivity of plants in many areas of the world due to increasing use of poor quality of water for irrigation and soil salinization. The over increasing salinity of land and water resources is one of the most important problems in Iran’s agriculture. A key characteristic of plant development is its plasticity in response to various changing environmental conditions. Roots are important to plants for a wide variety of processes, including nutrient and water uptake, anchoring and mechanical support, storage functions, and as the major interface between the plant and various biotic and abiotic factors in the soil environment. Congregated information on wheat root system as influenced by saline condition is meager.
Materials and methods
In order to investigate the effect of salinity on some root characteristics and ion distribution, a research was carried out in a three-replicate split factorial with two salinity levels 2dsm-1 (control) and 16dsm-1 (salinity) on six wheat cultivars (Atrak , Pishtaz, Chamran, Roshan, Ghods and Shiraz) and in two levels of harvest (two weeks and three weeks after planting) in greenhouse. The traits of root dry weight, shoot dry weight, shoot dry weight/root dry weight ratio, root length, total volume, sodium, potassium and potassium / sodium ratio in root and shoot, number of main root and number of first and second- order lateral roots were measured.
Results and discussion

The results showed that salinity in the second and third week reduced the dry weight of root, shoot, length, root volume and root number in all cultivars. Regarding the reduction and amount of root and shoot dry weight, Qods cultivar is susceptible and Roshan cultivar is tolerant. Also, Chamran and Roshan cultivar had a high ability to produce root and shoot in the control treatment, respectively. Qods cultivar under salt stress in the second and third week showed the highest reduction in total root length compared to control treatment and also, it had the least root length in salinity treatment compared to other cultivars. In the second and third weeks, Qods for root production (main, first and second-order lateral root) produced a high root count in the control treatment. However, as a result of salinity, the number of first and second-order lateral roots was significantly reduced, and in this trait it was the most sensitive cultivar. Under salinity Shiraz cultivar maintained in the third week of rooting process and showed the lowest reduction in the number of first and second-order lateral roots. In Roshan and Qods cultivar, there was no significant difference in the level of sodium ion in root in control and salinity treatments in the second and third weeks. This indicates that the accumulation of sodium ion in the root is not affected by salinity. The Roshan cultivar in saline treatment was able to maintain potassium ion in roots and shoots every two weeks. Shiraz and Pishtaz cultivars at the beginning of stress are able to avoid its negative effects by not absorbing sodium, although they are affected by ionic effects by continuity of tension and sodium absorption.

Keywords

Akram, M., Malik, M. A., Ashraf, M.Y., Saleem, M.F., Hussain, M., 2007. Competitive seedling growth and K/Na ratio in different maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids under salinity stress. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 39(7), 2553-2563.
Bates, T.R., Lynch, J.P., 2000. The efficiency of Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) root hairs in phosphorus acquisition. American Journal of Botany. 87(7), 964-970.
Burssens, S., Himanen, K., Van de Cotte, B., Beeckman, T., Van Montagu, M., Inzé, D., Verbruggen, N., 2000. Expression of cell cycle regulatory genes and morphological alterations in response to salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta. 211(5), 632-640.
Chhipa, B., Lal, P., 1995. Na/K ratios as the basis of salt tolerance in wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 46(3), 533-539.
Davenport, R., James, R.A., Zakrisson-Plogander, A., Tester, M., Munns, R., 2005. Control of sodium transport in durum wheat. Plant Physiology. 137(3), 807-818.
Dvořák, J., Gorham, J., 1992. Methodology of gene transfer by homoeologous recombination into Triticum turgidum: transfer of K+/Na+ discrimination from Triticum aestivum. Genome. 35(4), 639-646.
Erdei, L., Taleisnik, E., 1993. Changes in water relation parameters under osmotic and salt stresses in maize and sorghum. Physiologia Plantarum. 89(2), 381-387.
Fakhri, S., Rahnama, A., Meskarbashi, M., 2016. Effect of salinity stress on growth and distributions of tissue-specific ion in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 18(4). 302-318 [In Persian with English summary].
Francois, L.E., Grieve, C.M., Maas, E.V., Lesch, S.M., 1994. Time of salt stress affects growth and yield components of irrigated wheat. Agronomy Journal. 86(1), 100-107.
Fricke, W., Bijanzadeh, E., Emam, Y., Knipfer, T., 2014. Root hydraulics in salt-stressed wheat. Functional Plant Biology. 41(4), 366-378.
Galkovskyi, T., Mileyko, Y., Bucksch, A., Moore, B., Symonova, O., Price, C.A., Fang, S., 2012. GiA Roots: software for the high throughput analysis of plant root system architecture. BMC Plant Biology. 12(1), 116.
García-Lidón, A., Ortiz, J.M., García-Legaz, M.F., Cerda, A., 1998. Role of rootstock andscion on root and leaf ion accumulation in lemon trees grown under saline conditions. Fruits. 2(53), 89-97.
Greenway, H., Munns, R., 1980. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annual Review of Plant Physiology. 31(1), 149-190.
Jin, K., Shen, J., Ashton, R. W., White, R. P., Dodd, I. C., Phillips, A. L., 2015. The effect of impedance to root growth on plant architecture in wheat. Plant and Soil. 392(1-2), 323-332.
Kingsbury, R.E., Epstein, R., Pearcy, W., 1984. Physiological responses to salinity in selected lines of wheat. Plant physiology. 74,417-425
Koevoets, I.T., Venema, J.H., Elzenga, J.T., Testerink, C., 2016. Roots withstanding their environment: exploiting root system architecture responses to abiotic stress to improve crop tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science. 7, 1335.
Malamy, J., 2005. Intrinsic and environmental response pathways that regulate root system architecture. Plant, Cell and Environment. 28(1), 67-77.
Malamy, J.E., Benfey, P.N., 1997. Down and out in Arabidopsis: the formation of lateral roots. Trends in plant science. 2(10), 390-396.
Mittal, R., Dubey, R.S., 1991. Behaviour of peroxidases in rice: changes in enzyme activity and isoforms in relation to salt tolerance. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 29, 31–40 (France).
Munns, R., James, R.A., 2003. Screening methods for salinity tolerance: A case study with tetraploid wheat. Plant and Soil. 253(1), 201-218.
Munns, R., Termaat, A., 1986. Whole-plant responses to salinity. Functional Plant Biology. 13(1), 143-160.
Munns, R.M. Tester., 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 59, 651-681.
Nibau, C., Gibbs, D., Coates, J., 2008. Branching out in new directions: the control of root architecture by lateral root formation. New Phytologist. 179(3), 595-614.
Nour, A.-E.M., Weibel, D., 1978. Evaluation of root characteristics in grain sorghum. Agronomy Journal. 70(2), 217-218.
Omielan, J., Epstein, E., Dvořák, J., 1991. Salt tolerance and ionic relations of wheat as affected by individual chromosomes of salt-tolerant Lophopyrum elongatum. Genome. 34(6), 961-974.
Poustini, K., Siosemardeh, A., 2004. Ion distribution in wheat cultivars in response to salinity stress. Field Crops Research. 85(2), 125-133.
Rahnama, A., Munns, R., Poustini, K., Watt, M., 2011. A screening method to identify genetic variation in root growth response to a salinity gradient. Journal of Experimental Botany. 62(1), 69-77.
Rahnama, A., Poustini, K., Tavakkol Afshari, R., Ahmadi, A., Alizadeh, H., 2011. Growth properties and ion distribution in different tissues of bread wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) differing in salt tolerance. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 197(1), 21-30.
Robin, A.H.K., Matthew, C., Uddin, M.J., Bayazid, K.N., 2016. Salinity-induced reduction in root surface area and changes in major root and shoot traits at the phytomer level in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany. 67(12), 3719-3729.
Saqib, M., Akhtar, J., Qureshi, R.H., 2004. Pot study on wheat growth in saline and waterlogged compacted soil: II. Root growth and leaf ionic relations. Soil and Tillage Research. 77(2), 179-187.
Schachtman, D., Munns, R., 1992. Sodium accumulation in leaves of Triticum species that differ in salt tolerance. Functional Plant Biology. 19(3), 331-340.
Shelden, M.C., Roessner, U., Sharp, R.E., Tester, M., Bacic, A., 2013. Genetic variation in the root growth response of barley genotypes to salinity stress. Functional Plant Biology. 40(5), 516-530.
Tavakoli, M., Poustini, K., Alizadeh, H., 2016. Proline Accumulation and Related Genes in Wheat Leaves under Salinity Stress. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 18(3), 707-716. [In Persian with English summary].
Wang, Y., Li, K., Li, X., 2009. Auxin redistribution modulates plastic development of root system architecture under salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Plant Physiology. 166(15), 1637-1645.
Watt, M., Magee, L.J., McCully, M.E., 2008. Types, structure and potential for axial water flow in the deepest roots of field‐grown cereals. New Phytologist. 178(1), 135-146.
Weaver, J.E., 1919. The Ecological Relations of Roots. Carnegie Institute of Washington, Publication 286, Washington.
Wei, W., Bilsborrow, P.E., Hooley, P., Fincham, D.A., Lombi, E., Forster, B.P., 2003. Salinity induced differences in growth, ion distribution andpartitioning in barley between the cultivar Maythorpe and its derived mutant Golden Promise. Plant and Soil. 250(2), 183-191.
Weimberg, R., 1987. Solute adjustments in leaves of two species of wheat at two different stages of growth in response to salinity. Physiologia Plantarum. 70(3), 381-388.