Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Former MSc student of Cell and Molecular Biology, College of Biology Gonbad Kaous University, Iran

2 Department of Biology, College of Science, Gonbad Kavous University, Iran.

3 Associate Prof. College of Agriculture Science and Natural Resource, Gonbad Kaous University, Iran

4 Assistant Prof. College of Agriculture Science and Natural Resource, Gonbad Kaous University, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the most important crops in the world, especially in Asian countries that provides energy for more than 2.7 billion people worldwide daily, and is planted on approximately one-tenth of the earth's arable land. Rice is one of the most important cereal and salinity is a major limitation in the development of rice cultivation. Genetically improving salt tolerance of rice is a highly important objective of rice breeding programs. Traits such as salt tolerance are quantitatively inherited. Therefore, mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) with molecular markers can be very helpful to plant breeders in the field of agricultural genomics. Therefore, the present study was conducted to mapping of genotype code, starch, phenol, proline and chlorophyll content.

Materials and methods
A F8 RILs population, derived from a cross between a salt tolerance Ahlemi‌ Tarom (ATM) and salt sensitive Neda (NAD) which were used in this study. The genetic material involved 96 lines were used to evaluate the salt tolerance. This experiment was conducted at the Gonbad Kavous University at 2014 under hydroponics condition. The seeds were placed 50 ˚C for 3 days to break dormancy, and then germinated at 25 ˚C for four days. Finally, the germinated seeds were sown in holes of the Styrofoam board with a nylon net bottom and roots were placed in water. which floated on water for 3 days, and after were transferred to float on Yoshida's nutrient solution for 11 days. Two weeks after sowing, the seedlings were transferred to nutrient solution with electrical conductivity 6 dSm-1 for 7 days, then NaCl concentration was increased to 12 dSm-1 for further 7 days. This experiment was conducted in a controlled condition with 16-hours photoperiod, temperature of 29/21 ˚C, and minimum relative humidity of 70%. The culture solution was renewed weekly and pH solution was controlled three times a and was fixed constant by adding either NaOH or HCL. Chlorophyll content was measured using a SPAD device. The polymerase chain reaction was performed in a volume of 10 µL for each reaction. Polymerase chain reaction products were then separated using a 6% polyacrylamide gel and stained with fast nitrate of silver. The 96 lines Genetic linkage maps was prepared using 30 SSR markers and 15 ISSR markers covering 1411.3 cM of the rice genome. The average distance between two adjacent markers was 15.34 cM.

Results and discussion
For genotyping code, a QTL was detected on chromosome 7, explained 9.3% of phenotypic variation in the trait. For starch content, a gene locus was identified on chromosome 4, which had a LOD of 2.799. The additive effect for this QTL was 6.756 and explained 12.6% of the phenotypic variation in the trait. For the phenol content, a gene location was detected on chromosome 7, which explained 15.2% of the phenotypic variance of the trait, and had LOD and additive effect of 2.728 and 3.4338, respectively. The allels of the parents of Ahlemi‌ Tarom increased this trait. For a chlorophyll content, a QTL was detected on chromosome 5, with an LOD of 2.2. This QTL had an additive effect and a R2 of 0.097 and 9.2, respectively.
Conclusion
A total of four genetic locations were identified for four traits genotype code, starch, phenol, proline and chlorophyll content, respectively, on chromosomes 7, 4, 7 and 5, and explained 9.3, 12.6, 15.2 and 9.2 % of phenotypic variation of the traits. These locus had a LOD were 2.038, 2.799, 3.438 and 2.02, respectively. No QTL was detected for proline. The results of this study can identify the better genotypes in term of traits checked for marker selection programs.

Keywords

 
An, Z.W., Xie, L.L., Cheng, H., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Q., He, X.G., 2009. A silver staining procedure for nucleic acids in polyacrylamide gels without fixation and pretreatment. Analytical Biochemistry. 391, 77-79.
Ansari, R., Shereen, A., Flowers, T.J., Yeo, A. R., 2001. Identification rice lines for improved salt tolerance from a mapping population. In: Peng, S., Hardy, B. (eds.), Rice Research for Food Security and Poverty Alleviation. Proceeding of the International Rice Research Conference, 31 March- 3 April 2000, Los Banos, Philippines. pp: 285-291.
Bao, J.S. Corke, H. Ping, H., Li-Huang, Z., 2003. Analysis of QTL for starch properties of rice based on an RIL population. Acta Botanica Sinica. 45(8), 986-994.
Bao, Y., Huang, L., Li, Y., Wang, M., Liang, Z., 2019. How different Nitrogen application rates affect yield composition and Nitrogen uptake of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in saline-sodic paddy field. Polish Journal Environmental Studies. 28, 553-564.
Bates, L. S., Waldren, S. P., Teare, I. D., 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water– stress studies. Plants and Soil. 39, 205-207.
DuNing, X., Lix, Y., Song, D., Yang, G., 2007. Temporal and spatial dynamical simulation of groundwater characteristics in Minqin Oasis. Science China Ser D-Earth Science. 2, 261-273.
Feng, Y. Cao, L.Y. Wu, W.M. Shen, X.H. Zhan, X.D. Zhai, R.R. Wang, R.C. Chen, D.B., Cheng, S.H., 2010. Mapping QTLs for nitrogen-deficiency tolerance at seedling stage in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Breeding. 129, 652-656.
Fukuda, A., Terao, T., 2015. QTLs for shoot and chlorophyll content of rice seedling grown under low-temperature conditions, using a cross between Indica and Japonica cultivars. Plant Production Science. 18, 128-136.
Gregorio, G.B., 1997. Tagging salinity tolerance genes in rice using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP). PhD thesis. University of Philippines, Los Banos.
Haq, T. U., Akhtar, J., Gorham, J., Khalid, M., 2008. Genetic mapping of QTLs, controlling shoot fresh and dry weight under salt stress in rice cross between CO39×Moroberekan. Pakistan Journal of Botanical. 40, 2369-2381.
Kosambi, D.D., 1944. The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Annuals of Eugene. 12, 172-175.
Koyama, M. L., Levesley, A., Koebner, R. M. D., Flowers, T. J., Yeo, A. R., 2001. Quantitative trait loci for component physiological traits determining salt tolerance in rice. Plant Physiology. 125, 406-422.
Kumar, V., Shiram, V., Jawali, N., Shitole, M. G., 2007. Differential response of indica rice genotypes to NaCl stress in relation to physiological and biochemical parameters. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 48, 339-344.
Lee, S.Y., Ahn, J.H., Cha, Y.S., Yun, D.W., Lee, M.C., Ko, J.C., Lee, K.S. Eun, M.Y., 2007. Mapping QTLs related to salinity tolerance of rice at the young seedling stage. Plant Breeding. 126, 43-46.
Malik, C.P., Singh, M. B., 1980. Plant Enzymology and Histoenzymology. Kalyani Publishers. New Dehli. 286p.
Manly, K.F., Olson, J.M., 1999. Overview of QTL mapping software and introduction to Map Manager QT. Mammalian Genome. 10, 327-334.
McCouch, S. R., Cho, Y. G., Yano, M., Paul. E., Blinstrub, M., 1997. Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genetic Newsletter. 14, 11-13.
Nelson, J.C., 1997. QGENE: software for marker-based genomic analysis and breeding. Molecular Breeding. 3, 239-245.
Rabiei, B., Mardani, K.H, Sabouri, H., Sabouri, A., 2014. The effect of rice chromosome 1 on traits associated with drought and salinity tolerance at germination and seedling stages. Seed and Plant Improve Journal. 30, 1-16. [In Persian with English Summary].
Sabouri, H., 2008. Evaluation of genetic variety of Iranian rice germplasma plants for tolerance to salinity and location of related QTL. PhD. thesis. Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. [In Persian with English Summary].
Sabouri, H., Sabouri, A., 2008. New evidence of QTLs attributed to salinity tolerance in rice. African Journal of Biotechnology 7, 4376-4383.
Saghi Maroof, M.A., Biyaoshev, R.M., Yang, G. P., Zhang, Q., Allard, R.W., 1994. Extra ordinarily polymorphic microsatellites DNA in barley species diversity, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 91, 4566-5570.
Sayed, M.A., Schumann, H., Pillen, K., Naz, A.A., Leon, J., 2012. AB-QTL analysis reveals new alleles associated to proline accumulation and leaf wilting under drought stress conditions in barley. BMC Genetics 13, 61-72.
Shahid-Masood, M., Seiji, Y., Shinwari, Z.K. Anwar, R., 2004. Mapping quantitative trait loci for salt tolerance in rice using RFLP. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 36(4), 825-834.
Shannon, M.C., Gronwald, J.W., TAL, M., 1987. Effect of salinity on growth and accumulation of organic and inorganic ions in cultivated and wild tomato species. Journal of American Horticulture Science. 112, 516-523.
Singh, M.P., Singh, D.K., Rai, M., 2007. Assessment of growth, physiological and biochemical parameters and activities of antioxidant enzymes in salinity tolerant and sensitive basmati rice varieties. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 193, 398-412.
Thayumanavan, B., Sadasivam, S., 1984. Physicohemical basis for the preferential uses of certain rice varieties Plant Foods Human Nutrition. 34, 235-259.
Thomson, M.J., Ocampo, M.D., Egdane, J., Rahman, M.A., Sajise, A.G., Adorada, D.L., Tumimbang-Raiz, E., Blumwald, E., Seraj, Z.I., Singh, R.K., Gregorio, G.B., Ismail, A.M., 2010. Characterizing the saltol QTL for salinity tolerance in rice. Rice. 3, 148-160.
Zang, J., Sun, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, J., Li, F., Zhou, Y., Zhu, L., Reys, J., Fotokian, M., Xu, J., Li, Z., 2008. Dissection of genetic overlap of salt tolerance QTL at the seedling and tillering stage using backcross lines in rice. Science in China Series. 51, 583-591.
Zhang, G.Y., Gua, Y., Lin, C.s., Chen, S.Y., 1995. RFLP tagging of a salt tolerance gene in rice. Plant Science. 110, 227-234.
Jiang, Y., Huang, B. 2001. Drought and heat stress injury to two cool-season turfgrass in relation to antioxidant metabolism and lipid peroxidation. Crop Science. 41, 463-442.