Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Graduate of Plant Breeding, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Sugar Beet Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Plants encounter biological and non-biological stress at different stages of their development. In this regard, drought stress is the most important non-seismic factor that, with global warming and the increased likelihood of drought, it is anticipated that by 2050, the performance of agricultural products in 50 percent of the world's agricultural land would be at serious risk. This will lead to a significant reduction in the production of food products. The dry and semi-arid climate of the country has become inevitable the cultivation and production of crops under the conditions of environmental stresses (drought, salinity and heat).Crops are show different reactions against these stresses. The occurrence of any of the stresses, or a combination of them, leads to a reduction in production. Sugar beet is one of the plants that tolerates these stresses. The aim of this research was to evaluate the tolerance of sugar beet test cross hybrids under non-stress and water deficit stress conditions in Khorasan Razavi province in order to select promising and drought tolerant hybrids.
Materials and methods
This experiment was conducted to evaluate the drought tolerance of sugar beet test cross hybrids (57 hybrids) with seven controls including IR7, Mandarin, Jolgeh, Paya, Fotora, SC (7112*SB36) and origin population) in Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center in two separate experiments under field conditions with unbalanced lattice design (8*8) with four replications in 2016. Irrigation was done routinely up to the thinning. Subsequent irrigations were done after 90 mm and 200 mm evaporation from the class A evaporation pan in non-stress and water deficit stress conditions, respectively. In this research, traits such as root yield, sugar content, sugar yield, Na, K, N, alkalinity, molasses sugar, white sugar content, white sugar yield and extraction coefficient of sugar were measured. Analysis of variance, estimation of correlations and step wise regression were performed with SAS 9.1 software and also path analysis was done using Amos v19 software.

Results and discussion
Combined analysis of variance showed that there was a significant difference (p≤0.01) among studied genotypes and different irrigation regimes for all traits. The highest white sugar yield in non-stress and water deficit stress conditions were observed in (7112 * SB36) * S1 – 73 (13.34 ton / ha) and Mandarin (9.37 ton / ha), respectively. Correlation analysis revealed that the relationship between white sugar yield with root yield, sugar content, sugar yield, white sugar content and extraction coefficient of sugar was significantly positive in two conditions, while its correlation with Na, K, alkalinity and molasses sugar was significantly negative. According to the results of the stepwise regression analysis, more than 99 percent of white sugar yield variation was explained by sugar yield, extraction coefficient of sugar, root yield and sugar content in non-stress and drought stress conditions.

Conclusions
In general, the results showed that the genotypes 61 (Mandarin), 60 (IR7), 63 (Fotora), 51 (7112 * SB36) * S1 – 73), 40 (7112 * SB36) * S1 - 66) and 56 (7112 * SB36) * S1 - 72), which were superior in terms of stress tolerance index (STI) and also in terms of yield traits in stress condition, were introduced as the most drought tolerant genotypes.

Keywords

Abdollahian Noghabi, M., Radaei-al-amoli, Z., Akbari, G.A., Sadat Nuri, S.A., 2011. Effect of sever water stress on morphological, quantitative and qualitative characteristics of 20 sugar beet genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 42, 453-464. [In Persian with English Summary].
Abdollahian Noghabi, M., Sheikholeslami, R., Babaei, B., 2005. Terms and definitions of technological quantity and quality of sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet. 21, 101-104. [In Persian with English Summary].
Ahmad, P., Jamsheed, S., Hameed, A., Saima, R., Sharma, S., Azooz, M.M., Hasanuzzaman, M. 2014. Drought Stress Induced. In: Ahmad, P. (ed.), Oxidative Damage and Antioxidants in Plants Oxidative Damage to Plants: Antioxidant Networks and Signaling, Drought Stress Induced Oxidative Damage and Antioxidants in Plants. Academic Press, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 345-367.
Ahmadi, M., Majidi Heravan, E., Sadeghian, S.Y., Mesbah, M., Darvish, F., 2011. Drought tolerance variability in S1 pollinator lines developed from a sugar beet open population. Euphytica. 178, 339-349.
Farshadfar, A., 2000. Principal and Method of Multivariate Statistic. University of Razi Kermanshah Press. [In Persian].
Fazli, H., Sadeghian, S.Y., Mohammadian, R., 1998. Importance of quantitative and qualitative characters of sugar beet in breeding for drought tolerance.The 5th Iranian Crop Science Congress. Karaj. pp. 246-247. [In Persian].
Fernandez, G.C.J., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance, In:Kuo CG (Ed.), Adaptation of Food Crops to Temperature and Water-Stress, VRDC, Shanhua, Taiwan. pp. 257-270.
Fotouhi, K., Ali Ahmad, J., Nourjou, A., Pedram, A., Khorshid, A., 2008. Irrigation management based on allowed water depletion at different growth stages of sugar beet in Miyandoab region. Journal of Sugar Beet. 24, 43-60. [In Persian with English Summary].
Foroozesh, P., Majidi Heravan, E., Bihamta, M.R., Fatollah Taleghani, D., Habibi, D., 2012. Physiological evaluation of sugar beet genotypes under drought stress. American-Eurasian Journal of  Agriculture and Environmental Science. 12, 820-826.
Gavuzzi, P.R., Palumbo, M., Campanile, R.G., Ricciarid, G.L., Borgh, B., 1997. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictor of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 77, 523-531.
Ghafari, E., Rajabi, A., Izadi Darbandi, A., Rozbeh, F., Amiri, R., 2016. Evaluation of new sugar beet monogerm hybrids for drought tolerance. Journal of Crop Breeding. 8, 8-16. [In Persian with English Summary].
Hamidi, H., Ahmadi, M., Ramezanpour, S., Masoumi, A., Khorramian, S., 2018. Estimation of heterosis and heritability of drought stress tolerance in test cross genotypes of sugar beet. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 11, 275-288. [In Persian with English Summary].
Hekamat Shoar, H., 1992. Plant physiology in difficult situation. Tabriz University Press. [In Persian with English Summary].
Khajepur, M.R., 1998. Industrial crops. SID publishers. Industrial University of Isfahan. pp. 450. [In Persian with English Summary].
Kheirabi J., 1995. Analysis of low irrigation. Define and explained. Journal of Water, Soil and Machine. 13, 16-24.
Kirda, C., 2002. Deficit irrigation scheduling based on plant growth stages showing water stress tolerance. In: Deficit Irrigation Practices. FAO.
Koocheki, A., Soltani, A., 1996. Sugar beet Agronomy. Jihade-Daneshgahi Press of Mashhad. 200p. [In Persian].
Koocheki, A., Soltani, A., Azizi, M., 2003. Plant ecophysiology. Publications University of Mashhad. pp. 272. [In Persian].
Mirzaee, M.R., and Rezvani, S.M.A., 2007. Effects of water deficit on quality of sugar beet at different growth stages. Journal of Sugar Beet. 23, 29-42. [In Persian with English Summary].
Mohammadian, R., Sadeghian, S.Y., Moghadam, M., Rahimian, H., 2003. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices in determining sugar beet genotypes early season drought conditions. Journal of Sugar Beet. 18, 29-49. [In Persian with English Summary].
Nasri, R., Kashani, A., Paknejad, F., Sadeghi-Shojae, M., Ghorbani, S., 2012. Correlation and path analysis of qualitative and quantitative yield in sugar beet in transplant and direct sowing methods in saline lands. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding. 8, 213-226. [In Persian with English Summary].
Nourjoo, A., Baghaee Kia, M., 2004. Study on the irrigation cut-off effects at different growth stages on quantity and quality of sugar beet in Khoy region. Journal of Sugar Beet. 20, 27-38. [In Persian with English Summary].
Orazizadeh, M.R., Rajabi, A., Ahmadi, M., 2016. Selection of drought-tolerant half-sib families in sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet. 32, 1-12. [In Persian with English Summary].
Oroojnia, S., Habibi, D., Taleghani, D.F., Safari Dolatabadi, S., Pazoki, A., Moaveni, P., Rahmani, M., Farshidi, M., 2012. Evaluation of yield and yield components of different sugar beet genotypes under drought stress. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding. 8, 127-144. [In Persian with English Summary].
Ouda Sohier, M.M., 2005. Yield and quality of sugar beet as affected by planting density and nitrogen fertilizer levels in the newly reclaimed soil. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research. 32, 701-715.
Parvizi Almani, M., Abd-Mishani, C., Yazdi Samadi, B., 1997. Study on drought resistance in sugar beet genotypes. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science. 288, 15-25. [In Persian].
Rajabi, A., Vahidi, H., Haj Seyed Hadi, M.R., Fathollah Taleghani, D., 2013. Study on drought tolerance and interrelationships among some agronomic and morphophysiological traits in sugar beet lines. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. 5, 761-768.
Sadeghian, S.Y., Fazli, H., Mohammadian, R. Talaghani, D.F., Mesbah, M., 2000. Genetic variation for drought stress in sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet Research. 37, 55-77.
Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S., Fasahat, P., 2016. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices and their correlation in sugar beet lines. Journal of Sugar Beet. 32, 13–27. [In Persian with English Summary].
Vazan, S., 2002. Study on the effect of drought stress on the rate of abscisic acid accumulation and other physiological traits in sugar beet. Ph.D thesis. Science and Research Branch of Islamic Azad University, Tehran. 212p. [In Persian].
Westage, M., Boyer, J., 1985. Osmotic adjustment and the inhibition of leaf, root, stem and silk growth at low warerporentials in maize. Planta. 164, 459-540.
Yan, W., Kang, M.S., 2002. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists and agronomists. CRC press, Florida, USA, 267p.