Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor of College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

2 Associate professor of College of Agriculture and NaturalResources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Drought is the most severe abiotic stress factor limiting plant growth and crop production. Many physiological processes in plants are impaired by drought stress. Also this stress can damage the photosynthesis of plants, pigments and plastids, reduce chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and other carotenoids, hydrolyze proteins and prevalent photochemical reactions in most plants. The response of plants to droght stress depends on several factors such as developmental stage, severity, duration of stress, and cultivar genetics. Several strategies have been developed in order to decrease the water limitation-induced toxic effects on plant growth, among them use of biofertilizers (Seyed Sharifi and Namvar, 2016) and methanol (Ramberg et al., 2002) play a key role in yield improvement. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of irrigation withholding in reproductive stages, biofertilizers and methanol application on yield and and some biochemical traits of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).
Materials and methods
A factorial experiment was conducted based on randomized complete block design with three replications in 2017. The area is located at 38˚ 15′ N latitude and 48˚ 15′ E longitude with an elevation of 1350 m above mean sea level. The experimental factors were included: application of methanol at three levels (foliar application with water as control, application 20 and 30 volume percent), bio fertilizers at four levels (no application as control, rhizobium legominozarum application, both application mycorhyza+ rhizobium legominozarum, application of mycorhyza+ rhizobium legominozarum +Psesomonas) and three irrigation levels (full irrigation as control, severe water limitation or irrigation withholding at flowering stage, moderate water limitation or irrigation withholding at podding). Foliar application with methanol was done in two stage of period growth (productive and reproductive stages).
Results
The results dicated that irrigation withholding at flowering stage increased proline content and antioxidant enzymes activity such as catalase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase, but decreased chlorophyll content, quantum yield and grain yield of chickpea. Methanol application decresed antioxidant enzymes activity but quantum yield, proline and chlorophyll content increased. Also, bio fertilizers application increased quantum yield, proline and chlorophyll content, antioxidant enzymes activity and grain yield of Chickpea. Full irrigation with application of high rates of methanol, both application of mycorhyza with rhizobium legominozarum and Psesomonas increased grain yield 111% compared to no application of methanol and bio fertilizers under irrigation withholding at flowering stage condition.
Generally, it seems that application of methanol and biofertilizers can be as a proper tool for increasing grain yield of chickpea under water limitation condition

Keywords

Ahmad, P., Prasad, MNV., 2012. Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants: Metabolism, Productivity and Sustainability. Springer, New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London.
Akbari, G.H., Morteza, E., Moaveni, P., Alahdadi, I., Bihamta, M.R., Hasanloo, T., Aliabadi Farahani, H., 2014. Pigments apparatus and anthocyanins reactions of borage to irrigation, methylalchol and titanium dioxide. International Journal of Biosciences. 4, 192-208.
Al-Karaki, G.N., Mc-Michael, B., Zak, J., 2004. Field response of wheat to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and drought stress. Mycorrhiza. 14, 263-269.
Armand, N., Amiri, H., Ismaili, A., 2016. The effects of foliar application of methanol on morphological characteristics of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under drought stress condition. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 13, 854-863. [In Persian with English Summary].
Arnon, D.I., 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplast polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology. 24, 1-15.
Ashraf, M., Iram, A., 2005. Drought stress induce changes in some organic substances in nodules and other plant parts of two potential legumes differing in salt tolerance. Journal of floa. 200, 535-546.
Auge, R.M., Schekel, K.A., Wample, R.L., 2001. Osmotic adjustement in leaves of VA mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal rose plants in response to drought stress. Plant Physiology. 82, 670-765.
-Bates I.S, Waldern R.P., Teare I.D., 1973. Rapid determination of free prolin for water stress studies, Plant and Soil. 39, 205-207.
Bayoumi, T.Y., Eid, M., Metvali, E.M., 2008. Application of physiological and biochemical indices as a screeninig technique for drought tolerance in wheat genotypes. Africian Journal of Biotechnology. 7, 2341-2352.
Demir, S., 2004. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on some physiological growth parameters of pepper. Turkish Journal Biology. 28, 85-90
Dorkhov, Y.L., Shindypina, A.V., Sheshukova, E.V., Komarova, T.V., 2015. Metabolic methanol: molecular pathway and physiological roles. Physiological Reviews. 95, 603-644.
Downie, A., Miyazaki, S., Bohnert, H., John, P., Coleman, J., Parry, M., Haslam, R., 2004. Expression profiling of the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to methanol stimulation, Phytochemistry. 65, 2305-2316.
Flexas, J., Medrano, H., 2008. Droght inhibition of photosynthesis in C3-plants: stomata and nonstomatal limitation revisited. Annal of Botany. 183, 183-189.
Gianinazzi, S., Schuepp, H., Barea, J.M., Haselwandter, K., 2001. Mycorrhizal technology in agriculture: from genes to bioproducts. Birkhauser, Basel. ISBN: 376436858. Also in: Mycorrhiza. 13, 53-54. Lovato, P. Book review.
Goksoy, A.T., Demir, A.O., Turan, Z.M., Daustu N. 2004. Responses of sunflower to full and limited irrigation at different growth stages. Field Crop Research. 87, 167-178
Gout, E., Aubert, S., Bligny, R., Rebeille, F., Nonomura, A.R, Benson, A., Douce, R. 2000. Metabolism of methanol in plant cells. Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance studies. Plant Physiology. 123, 287-296.
Hadi, H., Seyed Sharifi, R., Namvar, A., 2016. Phytoprotectants and Abiotic Stresses. Urmia University press. 342p. [In Persian with English Summary].
Heins, R. 1980. Inhibition of ethylene synthesis and senescence in carnation by ethanol, American Society and Horticultural Science. 105, 141-144.
Hossinzadeh, S.R., Salimi, A., Ganjeali, A. 2011. Effects of methanol on morphological characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under drought stress. Environmental Stresses and Crop Science. 4, 139-150. [In Persian with English Summary].
Kheirizadeh Arough, Y., Seyed Sharifi, R., Sedghi, M., Barmaki, M., 2016. Effect of zinc and bio fertilizers on antioxidant enzymes activity, chlorophyll content, soluble sugars and proline in Triticale under salinity condition. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 44, 116-124.
Kohler, J., Hernandez, J.A., Caravaca, F., Roldan, A., 2008. Plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi modify alleviation biochemical mechanisms in water stressed plants. Functional Plant Biology. 35, 141-151.
Linderman, R.G., 1992. Vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizae and soil microbial interactions. In: Bethlenfalvay, G.J., Linderman, R. G, editors. Mycorrhizae in sustainable agriculture. Madison, Wis: ASA. Pp: 1-26.
Maiti, R.K., Moreno-limon, S., Wesche-ebeling, P., 2002. Responses of some crops to various abiotic stress factors and its physiological and biochemical basis of resistances. Agricultural Reviews. 21, 155-167.
Mirakhori, M, Paknejad, F., Moradi, F., Ardakani, M.R., Zahedi, H., Nazeri, P., 2009. Effect of drought stress and Methanol on yield and yield components of soybean Max (L17). American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 5, 162-169.
Mirakhori, M., Paknegad, F., Rihani, Y., Nazeri, P., Yeganehpour, F., Jamshidi, N., Gafari, M., 2012. Effects of foliar application of methanol on yield and some physiological traits of bean. Journal of Crop Echophysiology, 7, 17-27. [In Persian with English Summary].
Mishra, M., Kumar, U., Mishra, P.K., Prakash, V., 2010. Efficiency of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for the enhancement of Cicer arietinum L. growth and germination under salinity. Advances in Biological Research. 4, 92-96.
Nemecek-Marshall, M., MacDonald, R.C., Franzen, J.J., Wojciechowski, C.L., Fall, R., 1995. Methanol emission from leaves: enzymatic detection of gas-phase methanol and relation of methanol fluxes to stomatal conductance and leaf development. Plant Physiology. 108, 1359- 1368.
Nonomura, A.M., Benson, A.A., 1992. The path to carbon in photosynthesis: introved crop yields with methanol. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America the Academy. 89:9794-9798.
Oraki, H., Parhizkar Khanjani, F., Aghaalikhna, M., 2012. Effect of water deficit stress on proline contents, soluble sugars, chlorophyll and grain yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids. African Journal of Biotechnology. 11, 164-168.
 Qiao, G., Wen, X.P., Yu, L.F., Ji1, X.B., 2011. The enhancement of drought tolerance for pigeon pea inoculated by arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi. Plant Soil Environment. 57, 541-546.
Ramberg, H.A., Bradly, J.S.S., Olseon, I.S.C., Nishio, J.N., Markwell, J., Osterman, J.C., 2002. The role of menthal in promithing plant growth: an update. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 1, 113-126.
Roesti, D., Gaur, R., Johrim, B.N., Imfeld, G., Sharma, S., Kawaljeet, K., Aragno, M., 2006. Plant growth stage, fertilizer management and bioinoculation of Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria affect the rhizobacterial community structure in rain-fed wheat fields. Soil of Biology and Biochemistry. 38, 1111–1120.
Sannazzaro, A.I., Alberto, E., Ruiz, O.A., Menendez, B., 2005. Influence of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices on the saline stress physiology of Lotus glaber. Lotus Newsletter. 35, 29-30.
Seyed Sharifi, R., Namvar, A. 2016. Biofertilizers in Agronomy. University of Mohaghrgh Ardabili press. 282 p.
Sohrabi, Y., Heidari, G., Weisany, W., Ghasemi-Golezani, K., Mohammadi, K. 2012. Some physiological responses of chickpea cultivars to arbuscular mycorrhiza under drought stress. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 59, 708-716.
Sudhakar, C., Lakshmi, A., Giridara Kumar, S. 2001. Changes in the antioxidant enzyme efficacy in two high yielding genotypes of mulberry (Morus alba L.) under NaCl salinity. Plant Science. 167, 613-619.
Wu, S.C., Cao, Z.H., Li, Z.G., Cheung, K.C., Wong, M.H. 2005. Effects of bio fertilizer containing N-fixer, P and K solubilizers and AM fungi on maize growth: a greenhouse trial. Geoderma. 125, 155-166.
Yordanov, I., Velikova, V., Tsonev, T. 2003. Plant responses to drought and stress tolerance. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2, 187-206.
Zbiec, I., Karczmarczyk, S., Koszanski, Z. 1999. Influence of methanol on some cultivated plants. Folia Pomeranae Universitatis Technologiae Stetinensis. Agricultura, Alimentaria, Piscaria et Zootechnica. 73, 217-220.