Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, Yazd Agricultural and Natural Resources and Education Center, AREEO, Yazd, Iran

2 M.Sc. graduated of Seed Science and Technology, University of Tehran, Iran

3 PhD graduated of Seed Science and Technology, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Drought stress is one of the most important environmental factors to reduce the growth, yield and yield components of many crops, especially in arid and semi-arid regions of the world.Temperature is very important for seed germination. There for it can be said, and water potential are two primary environmental regulators of seed germination. Quantification of germination response to water potential at different temperature is possible using hydro time model. In this study, with using hydro time model quantification of Brassica napus L. germination response to water potential and temperature.

Material and methods
In this study germination response of Brassica napus L. to water potential at different temperature were studied. Experiments were conducted in 2017 on Brassica napus L. (Okapi) at the seed laboratory of Yazd Agricultural and Natural Resources and Education Center, AREEO, Yazd, Iran. Treatments included drought levels (0, -0.2, -0.4, -0.6 and -0.8 MPa) in temperatures of 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 °C. The response of cumulative germination seeds to different potentials at different temperature was quantified using normal function. All data were analyzed by SAS ver 9.2. The hydro time model was fitted to cumulative germination. Goodness of fit of the hydro time models to all data was checked by constructing plots of the coefficient of determination (R2), the relationship between the observed and the predicted germination percentage and base water potential.

Results
Results indicated that germination percentage increased with increasing temperature to 25 °C in all water potentials, while germination percentage and germination rate reduced as a result of water potential increment. The highest germination percentage (94 %) was obtained from control conditions at 20 and 25 °C. The minimum germination percentage (zero) was attained at 30 °C and -0.8 Mpa. Results indicated that, The hydro time constant (θH), base water potential, standard deviation of base water potential in population and the coefficient of determination (R2) for 10 °C were 81.34 Mpa h, -0.75 Mpa, 0.41 and 0.89, for 15 °C were 52.17 Mpa h, -0.82 Mpa, 0.47 and 0.70, for 20 °C were 28.71 Mpa h, -0.91 Mpa, 0.44 and 0.71, for 25 °C were 17.54 Mpa h, -0.81 Mpa, 0.42 and 0.73 and for 30 °C were 11.24 Mpa h, -0.52 Mpa, 0.35 and 0.82, respectively. The hydro time constant (θH) declined significantly with increasing temperatures, so that the minimum hydro time constant (11.24 MPa h) was attained at 30 °C. The increment of temperature resulted in significant reduction of base water potential, and the highest base water potential (-0.91 MPa) was obtained at 20 °C, and the minimum base water potential (-0.52 MPa) was attained at 30 °C. The minimum standard deviation of base water potential in population (0.35) was obtained at 30 °C, using hydro time model for quantitation of Brassica napus L.

Conclusion
Germination response to water potential at different temperatures, led to acceptable results. Utilizing the output of hydro time model at different temperatures can be useful in prediction of germination percentage of Brassica napus L. in different water potential.

Keywords

Adeli, R., Soltani, E., Akbari, G.A., Ramshini, H.A., 2017. Assessment of seed germination on the response to water potential in different canola genotypes using hydrotime model. Crops Improvement. 19(4), 921-932. [In Persian with English Summary].
Alimagham, S.M., Ghaderi-Far, F., 2014. Hydrotime model: Introduction and application of this model in seed researches. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 7(1), 41-52. [In Persian with English Summary].
Ansari, O., Choghazardi, H.R., Sharif Zadeh, F., Nazarli, H., 2012. Seed reserve utilization and seedling growth of treated seeds of mountain rye (Secale montanum) as affected by drought stress. Ceretari Agronomic Moldova. 2(150), 43-48.
Ansari, O., Gherekhloo, J., Kamkar, B., Ghaderi-Far, F., 2016. Breaking seed dormancy and determining cardinal temperatures for Malva sylvestrisusing nonlinear regression. Seed Science and Technology. 44(3), 1-14.
Balbaki, R.Z., Zurayk, R.A., Blelk, M.M., Tahouk, S.N., 1999. Germination and seedling development of drought tolerant and susceptible wheat under moisture stress. Seed Science and Technology. 27, 291-302.
Benech-Arnold, R.L., Sa´nchez, R.A., 1995. Modeling weed seed germination. P 545–566, In: Kigel, J., Galili, G. (eds.), Seed Development and Germination. New York, Marcel Dekker.
Bradford, K.J., Somasco O.A., 1994. Water relations of lettuce seed thermoinhibition I Priming and endosperm effects on base water potential. Seed Science Research. 4(1), 1–10.
Bradford, K.J., 1990. A water relation analysis of seed germination rates. Plant Physiology. 94, 840-849.
Bradford, K.J., 1997. The hydrotime concept in seed germination and dormancy, pp 349-360. In: Ellis, R.H., Black, M., Murdoch, A.J., Hong, T.D. (eds.), Basic. Applied Aspect. Seed Biology, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bradford, K.J., 2002. Applications of hydrothermal time to quantifying and modeling seed germination and dormancy. Weed Science. 50, 248–260.
Bradford, K.J., Still, D.W., 2004. Application of hydrotime analysis in seed testing. Seed Technology. 26, 74-85.
Brown, R.F., Mayer, G.G., 1988. Representing cumulative germination. The use of the Weibull function and other empirically derived curves. Annals of Botany. 6, 127-138.
Cardoso, V.J.M., Bianconi, A., 2013. Hydrotime model can describe the response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seeds to temperature and reduced water potential.  Acta Scientiarum, 35(2), 255-261.
del Monte, J.P., Dorado, J., 2011. Effects of light conditions and after-ripening time on seed dormancy loss of Bromus diandrus Roth. Weed Research. 51, 551–590.
Forcella, F., Oskaui, K.E., Wagner, S.W., 1993. Application of weed seed bank ecology to lowinput crop management. Ecology Applied. 3, 74-83.
Grundy, A.C., Phelps, K., Reader, R.J., Burston, S., 2000. Modelling the germination of Stellaria media using the concept of hydrothermal time. New Phytology. 148, 433–444.
Gummerson R.J., 1986. The effect of constant temperatures and osmotic potentials on the germination of sugar beet. Journal of Experimental Botany. 37(6), 729–741.
Hilhorst, H.W.M., 1998. The regulation of secondary dormancy. The membrane hypothesis revisited. Seed Science Research. 8, 77-90.
Huarte, R., 2006. Hydrotime analysis of the effect of fluctuating temperatures on seed germination in several non-cultivated species. Seed Science and Technology. 34, 533-547.
Leblanc, M. L., Cloutier, D.C., Stewart, K.A., Hamel, C., 2004. Calibration and validation of a common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) seedling emergence model. Weed Science. 52, 61–66.
Michel, B.E., Kaufmann, M.R., 1973. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant Physiology. 51, 914-916.
Myers, M.W., Curran, W.S., VanGessel, M.J., Calvin, D.D., Mortensen, D.A., Majek, B.A., Karsten, H.D., Roth, G.W., 2004. Predicting weed emergence for eight annual species in the northeastern United States. Weed Science. 52, 913–919
Nonogaki, H., Bassel G.W., Bewley J. D. 2010. Germination still a mystery. Plant Science. 179, 574–81.
Schellenberg, M.P., Biligetu, B., Wei, Y., 2013. Predicting seed germination of slender wheatgrass [Elymus trachycaulus (Link) Gould subsp. trachycaulus] using thermal and hydro time models. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 93, 793-798.
Sester, M., Dürr, C., Darmency, H., Colbach, N., 2007. Modeling the effects of cropping systems on the seed bank dynamics and the emergence of weed beet. Ecology Modeling. 204, 47–58.
Soltani, E., Adeli, R., Akbari, G.A. and Ramshini, H.A., 2017. Application of hydrotime model to predict early vigor of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under abiotic stresses. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 39: 252.
Tabatabaei, S.A., Ansari, O., 2017.  Quantification of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) seed germination response to water potential and priming: hydro time models on the basis of normal, weibull and gumbel distributions. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 11(2), 327-340. [In Persian with English Summary].
Taghi Zoghi, S., Soltani, E., Alahdadi, I. and Sadeghi, R., 2018. The effect of different seed coating treatments on seed germination of canola under drought and salinity stresses, using modeling approach. Crops Improvement. 20(3), 577-593. [In Persian with English Summary].
Windauer, L., Altuna, A. and Benech-Arnold, R., 2007. Hydrotime analysis of Lesquerella fendleri seed germination responses to priming treatments. Industrial Crops Products. 25, 70-74.