Investigation of soybean advanced lines and parental varieties under non-stress and under water stress conditions

Kohanpour, Zobeyde; Sabouri, Atefeh; Hezar Jaribi, Ebrahim; Aalami, Ali

doi:10.22077/escs.2019.1792.1412

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ Former MSc student, Department of Engineering of Production and Plant Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

² Associate Professor, Department of Engineering of Production and Plant Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

³ Staff Member, Agricultural Research and Natural Resources Center of Gorgan, Agricultural Extension and Education Research Organization (AEERO), Gorgan, Iran

⁴ Associate Professor, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2019.1792.1412

Abstract

Introduction
Soybean (Glycine max L.) is one of the most important oil seeds and its importance refer to its role in providing the essential fats needed to complete the human food pyramid similar to other oilseeds. In Iran, after cotton and canola, the highest cultivated land is dedicated to soybeans. The yield of plants such as soybeans is significantly reduced due to environmental stresses, especially drought stress. Thus the aim of the present study was an investigation of soybean advanced lines and parental varieties under non-stress and under water stress conditions to compare different genotypes and identification of more tolerant lines to water stress.
Material and methods
Plant materials consisted of 30 soybean genotypes including three parental varieties Sahar, Williams, Katoul and 27 advanced lines. The lines were derived from parental varieties Sahar×K778, Sahar×Hamilton, Sahar×Gorgan3, Sahar×Williams, Williams×Katoul, Hamilton×Katoul, Sahar×Katoul, Williams×K778, Williams×Hamilton, Gorgan3×Williams. The plants were cultivated in a filed with a total area of 400 m2 at Ezberam, Siahkal (N 37°1.3′8 ̋N, 49°54′10.5 ̋E) in the Guilan province of Iran in spring and summer 2016 as randomized block complete design under normal and water stress conditions with three replications. A total of 14 traits were measured including plant height, number of nodes, first pod height from ground, number of branches, total weight of plant, number of pods, weight of total pods, number of filled pods, weight of filled pods, pod length, number of seeds per pod, number of total seeds, weight of total of seeds and 100- seed weight.
Results
The combined analysis of variance revealed genotypes difference and genotype×conditions interaction were significant (p<0.01) for all of the traits except pod length that indicated high diversity among soybean genotypes and different responses of genotypes to normal and water stress conditions for measured traits. According to the cluster analysis Ward method, all genotypes were assigned to three groups under normal condition. The first group consist of five advanced lines Williams×Katoul3123, Williams×Katoul(4), Williams×Hamilton(2), Sahar×Hamilton(4), Gorgan3×Williams(2) and Katoul had higher mean based on all of agronomic and yield traits such as number and weight of pods, weight of total seeds and 100- seed weight than other genotypes. Under water stress condition genotypes were classified into three groups that third group consisting of four lines Sahar×Katoul(4), Williams×Hamilton(1), Williams×K778(3) and Williams×Katoul(4) had higher performance based on important yield traits including number of pod, weight of pod, number and weight of filled pods, number of seeds per pod, number of seeds in plant, total weight of seeds in plant and 100- seed weight than other genotypes.
Conclusions
According to comparisons mean, Gorgan3×Williams(2) had the highest weight of total pods (94.4gr), number of branches (14.11), number and weight seeds in plant (284.22 and 66.98 gr respectively) and 100-seed weight (35.74gr) under normal condition and the highest weight of total pods (63.28 gr), weight of filled pods (61.91gr), number and weight seeds in plant (236.44 and 44.11gr respectively) and 100-seed weight (33.67gr) belonged to Williams×Katoul(4). Also according to cluster analysis to comparing soybean genotypes under normal and water stress conditions, Williams×Katoul(4) in both groupings, belonged to the better group, indicating that the line was superior to other lines and its parents in terms of total traits. Totally, advanced lines performed better than their parents, especially under water stress condition. Also according to principal component analysis and biplot of two first PC, Gorgan3×Williams(2) under normal condition and Williams×Katoul(4) under both of conditions were better than other lines and parental varieties.

Keywords

References

Bahmankar, M., Sadat Noori, S.A., Mortazavian, S.M.M., 2013. Transgressive segregation phenomena in breeding of crop plants. The Journal of Applied Crop Breeding. 1(2), 175-185.

Bokaei, A.S., Babaee, H., Habibi, D., Javidfar., F., Mohammadi, A., 2008. Evaluation of different soybean genotypes under drought stress conditions. Procceding of the 10^th Iranian Congress of Crops Sciences 18-20 Aug. 4(1), 28-38. [In Persian].

Charlson, D.V., Bhatnagar, S., King, C.A., Ray, J.D., Sneller, C.H., Carter Jr, T.E., Purcell, L.C., 2009. Polygenic Inheritance of Canopy Wilting in Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 119(4), 587–594.

Chen, P., Sneller, C.H., Sinclair, T.R., Ishibashia, T., Purcell, L.C., 2007. Registration of soybean germplasm lines R01-416F and R01-581F for improved yield and nitrogen fixation under drought stress. Journal of Plant Registrations. 1(2), 166-67.

Dalzotto, M.B., 2016. Selection of drought-tolerant soybean lines using a field screening method and identification of QTLs for slow wilting and nitrogen fixation associated with drought-tolerance. MSc dissertation, Faculty of Crop, Soil & Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.

Daneshian, J., Hadi, H., Jonoubi, P., 2009. Study of quantitative and quality characteristics of soybean genotypes in deficit irrigation conditions. Iranian Journal of Crops Sciences. 11(4), 393-409. [In Persian with English Summary].

Daneshian, J., Normohammadi, G.H., Jonoubi, P., 2002. Evaluatation of yeild the model difference and grain yeild components of soybean under drought stress conditions. Abstract the 7^thIranian Congress of crop Science 4-7 Sep. [In Persian].

Dogan, E., Clark, G.H., Rogers, D.H., Marttin, V., Vanderlip, R.L., 2006. On farm scheduling studies and CERES-Maize simulation of irrigated corn. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 22(4), 509-516.

FAO, 2016. Food Agriculture Organization statistics on line. http://faostat.fao.org/site

Farhoudi, R., Modhej, A., Payandeh. K., 2015. Effect of final season drought tension on photosynthesis, seed yield and seed vigor of five soybean cultivars. Crop Physiology Journal. 24(6), 41-55. [In Persian with English Summary].

Foroud, N., Mundel, H.H., Saindon, G., Entz, T., 1993. Effect of level and timing of moisture stress on soybean yield components. Irrigation Science. 13, 149–155.

Franklin, P., Gardner, R., Pearce, B., Mitchell, R.L., 2010. Physiololigy of Crop Plants. Scientific Press. 336p.

Jamali, S., Sadghi, H., Sadeghian-Motahhar, S.Y., 2011. Identification and distinction of soybean commercial cultivars using morphological and microsatellite markers. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 13(1), 131-145. [In Persian with English Summary].

John, M.G., 2001. Drought strees in soybeans. From http://WWW. Uwex.edu/ces/cty/mauitowoc/Ag papers/Drought strees soybean.

Kalantar Ahmadi, S.A., Daneshian, J., Mahmoodinezhad Dezfully, S.H., 2015. Effects of drought stress on soybean genotypes yield in northern Khouzestan conditions. Journal of Oil Plants Production. 2(1), 57-69. [In Persian with English Summary].

Kargar, S.M.A., Ghannadha, M.R., Bozorgipour, R., Khajeahmadattari, A.A., Babaaei, H.R., 2004. An investigation of drought tolerance indices in some soybean genotype under restricted irrigation conditions. 2004. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 35(1), 129-142. [In Persian with English Summary].

Khajepoor, M.R., 1992. Principles of Agronomy. Isfahan University of Technology Publication. 564p. [In Persian].

Meckel, L., Egli, D.B., Phillips, R.E., Radcliffe, D., Leggett, J.E., 1984. Effect of moisture stress on seed growth in soybean. Agronomy Journal. 76, 647-650.

Mehraban, A., Azizian Shermeh, O., Kamali Daljoo, A., 2016. Effect of drought stress on yield and quality of eight cultivars of soybean (Glycin max L.) in Sistan region. 43(11), 90-99. [In Persian with English Summary].

Mertz-Henning, L.M., Ferreira, L.C., Henning, F.A., Mandarino, J.M.G., Santos, E.D., Oliveira, M.C.N.D., Nepomuceno, A.L., Farias, J.R.B., Neumaier, N., 2018. Effect of Water Deficit-Induced at Vegetative and Reproductive Stages on Protein and Oil Content in Soybean Grains. Agronomy. 8(1), 3.

Moradi Telavat, M.R. Siadat, A, 2012. Introduction and Production of Oilseed Crops. Agricultural Extension and Education Publications. 373p. [In Persian].

Mozafari, K., Arshi, Y., Zinali, H., 1996. Study of drought stress effects on some morphologic (Helianthus anmus L.). P. 489-493. In proceeding of the 12^th International Sunflower. Conference, Noisad, Yugoslavia.

Peghambri, S.A., Taleb Khani, M. Babaei, H.R., Alipour, H., 2017. Evalution of tolerance to water deficit stress in diverse soybean genotypes. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 48(40), 933-943. [In Persian with English Summary].

Pookpakdi, A., Thiravirojana, K., Saeradee, I., Chaikaew S., 1990. Response of new soybean accession to water stress during reproductive phase. Kasetsart Journal of Natural Science. 24 (3), 375-387.

Ramseur, E.L., Quinsenberry, V.L., Wallace, S.V., Palmer, J.H., 1986. Yield and yield component of Braxton soybeans as influenced by irrigation and intra-row spacing. Agronomy Journal. 76, 442-446.

SAS. 2002. The SAS system for windows. Release 9.0. SAS Institute. Cary, NC, USA.

SPSS. 2008. The SPSS system for windows. Release 22.0. SPSS Inc., IBM Company Headquarters, USA.

Wei, Y., Jin, J., Jiang, S., Ning, S., Liu, L., 2018. Quantitative response of soybean development and yield to drought stress during different growth stages in the Huaibei Plain, China. Agronomy. 8(7), 97.

Zare, M., Zeinali Khanghah, H., Danashian, J., 2004. An evaluation of tolerance of some soybean genotypes to drought stress. Iranian Journal Agricultural Sciences. 35, 859-867. [In Persian with English Summary].

Zeinali Khanghah, H., Izanloo, A., Hoseinzadeh, A.H., Majnoon Hoseini, N., 2004. Determination of the suitable drought resistance indices in commercial soybeans varieties. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 35(4), 875-885. [In Persian with English Summary].

Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences

Investigation of soybean advanced lines and parental varieties under non-stress and under water stress conditions

References

References

Volume 13, Issue 1
Open Access Policy
April 2020
Pages 9-26

Investigation of soybean advanced lines and parental varieties under non-stress and under water stress conditions

References

References

Volume 13, Issue 1 Open Access PolicyApril 2020Pages 9-26

Volume 13, Issue 1
Open Access Policy
April 2020
Pages 9-26