Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Agronomy, Plant Physiology, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associated Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Faculty Member, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

4 Faculty Member, Payame Noor University, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Drought is one of the most important environmental stresses that influence various growth steps of the plant including germination, plantlet establishment, and production all over the world (Bacilar et al., 2007; Ben Ahmad et al., 2009). Drought stress has significantly increased in recent years because of changes in climate and increasing CO2 levels. Therefore, identification of the resistant plant varieties against drought stress in a necessity. Investigation the enabling mechanisms of plants to adapt to drought stress and protect their growth in that condition can help to select the resistant plants against drought stress to be cultivated in dry and semi-dry regions. Identification of the physiological mechanisms Lentil with the scientific name of Lens culinaris is from leguminous, one-year, long-day, self- pollinated, and diploid family (2n=14) with mean 5.28% protein. Lens culinaris is resistant to drought.

Materials and methods
12 Lens culinaris genotypes (Table 1) were examined in rainfed and deficit irrigation conditions in 2015-2016 agricultural years as the split spots based on randomized complete block designs with three repetitions whose main irrigation factor was in 2 levels (rainfed and deficit) and the secondary factor of genotypes in two individual Ardabil agriculture research stations and central part of Germi city in different conditions and climates to evaluate the genetic varieties of Lens culinaris cultivars, screening the quantitative indexes of resistance against drought, and identification of the resistant cultivars against drought. All plots were simultaneously irrigated in two steps of flowering and pot filling in 10ml in deficit irrigation treatment in each region and weren’t irrigated in stress treatment or rainfed and just raining was used up to the end of harvest. Each test unit was made of 4 cultivation line with 4m length, 30cm row distance, and 133 bushes in each row. Hand weeding was done in several steps to fight with weeds. Each genotype is harvested in proportion to its physiological consideration. In this step, two edge lines and 0.5m of two middle lines end were omitted to remove edge effect. Harvest was with hand. Seed performance was determined after threshing and separating the seeds from the straw based on seed weight (gr). Physiological characteristics were measured after the plant sheathing in both rainfed and deficit irrigation types

Results and discussion
Table of the combined variance analysis (Table 1) showed that the significant difference was observed among proline, chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b and peroxidase enzyme values of two cultivation methods, the comparison of the mean chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b (ml/gr) of wet weight in Germi region was 0.22 and 0.079 with the significant difference from Ardabil region. The reaction of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b to drought stress may be resulted by the plant metabolism tolerance in addition to the genetic differences against drought, and lack of the significant reaction between chlorophyll to stress can be attributed to the growth reduction in leaf. There was a significant difference in proline (μm/gr of wet weight) in Germi and Ardabil, but the amount of enzyme peroxidase (μgr of enzyme/gr of leaf) was higher in Ardabil. Proline accumulation is a popular physiological response of plants to the extensive range of bio and non-bio stresses (Geravandi et al., 2011). The maximum imposed damage by drought stress was for proline of Germi; as though, stress increased 23% of proline than Ardebil condition. In Gunes et al. (2008) research, drought stress after pollination significantly increased proline. There was a significant difference between rainfed and deficit irrigation conditions based on variance analysis. Bilesavar cultivar was considered as a control sample with the maximum peroxidase enzyme.

Conclusions

The results of this test show that in rainfed cultivation (drought stress) enzyme activity of the antioxidant and peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidas, proline and some characteristics for resistance plant against drought stress are increase.

Keywords

Allahmoradi, P., Mansourifar, C., Saidi, M., Jalali Honarmand, S., 2013. Water deficiency and its effects on grain yield and some physiological traits during different growth stages in lentil (Lens culinaris L.) cultivars. Annals of Biological Research. 4(5), 139-145.
Arnon, A.N., 1967. Method of extraction of chlorophyll in the plants. Agronomy Journal. 23, 112-121.
Azarpanah, A., Alizadeh, O., Dehghanzadeh, H., 2013. Investigation on proline and carbohydrates accumulation in Zea mays L. under water stress condition. Extreme life, Biospeology and Asterobiology. International Journal of the Bioflux Society. 5(1), 47-54.
Bacelar, E.A., Santaos, D.L., Moutinho-Pereira, J.M., Lopes, J.I., Goncalves, B.C., Ferreira, T.C., Correia, C.M., 2007. Physiological behaviour, oxidative damage and antioxidative protection of olive trees grown under different irrigation regimes. Plant Soil. 292, 1–12.
Bagheri, A., Goldani, M., Hassanzadeh, M., 1997. Agronomy and Breeding of Lentil (translation). Jahad Academic Publication of Mashhad.
Bajji, M., Lutts, S., Kient, J.M., 2001. Water deficit effects on solute contribution to osmotic adjustment as a function of leaf ageing in three durum wheat (Triticum durum) cultivars performing differently in arid conditions. Plant Science. 160, 669-681.
Bates, L.S., Waldren, R.P., Teare, I.D., 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress study. Plant and Soil. 39, 205-207.
Beauchamp, C., Fridovich., 1971. Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry. 44, 276-287.
Ben Ahmed, C., Ben Rouina, B., Sensoy, S., Boukhris, M., Ben Abdallah, F., 2009. Changes in gas exchange, proline accumulation and antioxidative enzyme activities in three olive cultivars under contrasting water availability regimes. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 67, 345–352.
Bettaieb, I., Hamrouni - Sellami, I., Bourgou, S., Limam, F., Marzouk, B., 2010. Drought effects on polyphenol composition and antioxidant activities in aerial parts of Salvia officinalis L. Acta Physiolgiae Plantarum. 33(4), 1103-1111
Cesar, G., Frage, C. G., 2010. Plant Phenolics and Human Health: Biochemistry, Nutrition, and Pharmacology, John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Edreva, A., 2005. Generation and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts: A submolecular approach. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 106, 119-133.
Farshadfar, E., Ghasempour, H., Vaezi, H., 2008. Molecular aspects of drought tolerance in bread wheat (T. aestivum). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 11(1), 118-121.
Farshadfar, A., Javadi Nia, J., 2011. Evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for drought tolerance. Seedling and Breeding Journal. 1(27), 517-537.
Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campaline, R.G., Ricciardi, G.L., Borghi, B., 1997. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 77, 523 -531.
Geravandi, M., Farshadfar, E., Kahrizi, D., 2011. Evaluation of some physiological traits as indicators of drought tolerance in bread wheat genotypes. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 58(1), 69-75.
Gunes, A., Inal, A., Adak, M.S., Bagci, E. G., Cicek, N., Eraslan, F., 2008. Effect of drought stress implemented at pre-or post-anthesis stage on some physiological parameters as screening criteria in chickpea cultivars. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 55(1), 59-67.
Jafarzadeh, L., Omidi, H., bostani, a.a., (2013). Effect of drought stress and biofertilizer on flower yield, photosynthetic pigments and proline content of spring wheat (Calendula officinalis L.). Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. 29, 660-666.
Kanzok, S.M., Fechner, A., Bauer, H., Ulschmid, J.K., Muller, H.M., Botella- Munoz, J., Schneuwly, S., Schirmer, R., Becker, K., 2001. Substitution of the thioredoxin system for glutation reductase in Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 291, 643-646.
Kocheva, K., Gorgiev, G., 2003. Evaluation of the reaction of two contrasting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars in response to osmotic stress with PEG 6000. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology. Special Issue, 290-294.
Lata, C., Sarita, J., Sreenivasulu, N., Prasad, M., 2011. Differential antioxidative responses to ehydration-induced oxidative stress in core set of foxtail millet cultivars. Protoplasma. 248, 817-828.
Mansourifar, S., Sha'ban, M., Ghobadi, M., Sabbaghpour, S.h., 2012. Iranian Journal of Legume Research. 3(1), 53-66.
Mittler, R., 2002. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends in Plant Science. 7, 405–410.
Monakhova, O.F., Chernyadev, I.I., 2002. Protective role of kartolin-4 in wheat plants exposed to soil drought. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 38, 373-380.
Nakano, Y., Asada, K., 1981. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate – specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiology. 22, 867-880.
Niknam, V., Razavi, N., Ebrahimzadeh, H. Sharifizadeh, B., 2006. Effect of NaCL on biomass, protein and proline contents and antioxidant enzymes in seedlings and calli of two Trigonella species. Biologia Plantarum. 50(4), 591-596.
Rahbarian, R., Khavari-Nejad, R., Ganjeali, A., Bagheri, A.R., Najafi, F., 2011. Drought stress effects on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and water. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia, Series Botanica. 53, 47-56.
Sadeghi, A., 2006. Introduction to Statistical Analysis Software SPSS14. Jehad-e-Daneshgahi Publications, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
Sadeghipour, O., 2001. Science of Crop Production. Medical and Sons Publications. 1, 64-72.
Shetabi, E., 2016. The paper examines the effect of drought stress on plants, International Conference on Modern Horizons in Agricultural Sciences, Natural Resources and the Environment.
Shiranirad, A., Abbasian, A., 2011. Evaluation of drought tolerance in winter rapeseed cultivars based on tolerance and sensitivity indices. Journal of Agriculture. 98, 41-48.
Sun, T., Xu, Z.C., Wu, T., Janes, M., Prinyawiwatkul, W., H, K., 2007. Antioxidant activities of different colored sweet bell peppers (Caspicum annuum L.). Food Science. 72, 98-102.
Yazici, I., Turkan, F., Sekmen, A.H., Demiral, T., 2007. Salinity tolerance of purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) is achieved by enhanced antioxidative system, lower level of lipid peroxidation and proline accumulation. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 61(1), 49–57.