Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. student, Plant Breeding, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Sugar Beet Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
The dry and semi-arid climate of the country has become inevitable the cultivation and production of crops under the conditions of environmental stresses (drought, salinity and heat).Crops are show different reactions against these stresses. The occurrence of any of the stresses, or a combination of them, leads to a reduction in production. Sugar beet is one of the plants that tolerates these stresses. The aim of this research was to determine the tolerance of sugar beet S1 pollinator lines to drought stress in field conditions in terms of yield and physiological traits so that based on the results, a model could be presented for better and more effective management of water on farms.

Materials and methods
This experiment was conducted to evaluate the physiological characteristics of 34 sugar beet genotypes (30 S1 pollinator lines with three controls including Shokoofa, Motahar and Paya and Origin population) under normal irrigation and drought stress conditions in a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications at experimental field of Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center in 2016. Irrigation was done routinely up to the thinning and weeding stage. Subsequent irrigations were done after 90 mm and 200 mm evaporation from the class A evaporation pan in non-stress and stress conditions, respectively. In this research, traits such as root yield, sugar content, sugar yield, chlorophyll, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Leaf Area Index (LAI), Index of difference between the temperature of environment and leaf, leaf relative water content, specific leaf weight, succulence index, specific leaf area and electrolyte leakage were measured. Analysis of variance and estimation of correlations were performed with SAS 9.1 software and also factor analysis was done using Statgraphics 18 software.

Results and discussion
Results showed that in both conditions (non-stress and drought stress conditions) there are significant different (p≤0.01) between all genotypes for all traits. Combined analysis of variance showed that there was a significant difference (p≤0.01) among studied genotypes and different irrigation regimes in the most traits. In normal irrigation and drought stress conditions, Motahar and S1-15 line had the highest sugar yield (9.09 and 10.5 ton/ha), respectively. Correlation coefficients showed that root yield had a positive and significant correlation with sugar yield and NDVI in normal and stress conditions. In both conditions (non-stress and drought stress conditions), factor analysis led to introduce four main factors which explained 69.55 and 74.75 percent of total variation, respectively.
Conclusions
In general, the results showed that there are considerable variations in yield and physiological traits among the different genotypes of sugar beet due to the potential for drought tolerance in them.

Keywords

AbdollahianNoghabi, M., 1999. Ecophysiology of sugar beet cultivars and weed species subjected to water deficiency stress. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading.
Abdollahian Noghabi, M., Radaei-al-amoli, Z., Akbari, G.A., Sadat Nuri, S.A., 2011. Effect of sever water stress on morphological, quantitative and qualitative characteristics of 20 sugar beet genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 42(3), 453-464. [In Persian with English Summary].
Abdollahian Noghabi, M., Sheikholeslami, R. Babaei, B., 2005. Technical terms of sugar beet yield and quality. Journal of Sugar Beet. 21(1), 101-104. [In Persian with English Summary].
Ahmadi, M., 2012. Study on characteristics related to drought tolerance in improved sugar beet population. PhD Thesis, College of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University of Science and Research of Tehran. [In Persian].
Ahmadi, M., Majidi Heravan, E., Sadeghian, S.Y., Mesbah, M., Darvish, F., 2011. Drought tolerance variability in S1 pollinator lines developed from a sugar beet open population. Euphytica. 178,339-349.
Bahavar. N., Ebadi, A., Tobeh, A., Jamati Somarin, S.H., 2009. Effects of nitrogen application on growth of irrigated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under drought stress in hydroponics conditions. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences .3(4), 448-455.
Barrs, H.D. and Weatherly, P.E., 1962. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 15, 413-428.
Bloch, D., Hoffmann, C.M., 2005. Seasonal development of genotypic differences in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and their interaction with water supply. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 191, 263-272.
Cakir, R., 2004. Effect of water stress at different developmental stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Research. 89, 1-16.
Fotouhi, K., Ali Ahmad, J., Nourjou, A., Pedram, A., Khorshid, A., 2008. Irrigation management based on allowed water depletion at different growth stages of sugar beet in Miyandoab region. Journal of Sugar Beet. 24 (1), 43-60. [In Persian with English Summary].
Ghafari, E., Rajabi, A., Izadi Darbandi, A., Rozbeh, F., Amiri, R., 2016. Evaluation of new sugar beet monogerm hybrids for drought tolerance. Journal of Crop Breeding. 8(17), 8-16. [In Persian with English Summary].
Hamidi, H., Ahmadi, M., Ramezanpour, S., Masoumi, A., Khorramian, S. 2018. Estimation of heterosis and heritability of drought stress tolerance in test cross genotypes of sugar beet. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 11(2), 275-288. [In Persian with English Summary].
Hekmat Shoar, H., 1992. Plant physiology in difficult situation. First Edition. Tabriz University Press. 251p. [In Persian with English Summary].
Hoffmann, C.M., 2005. Changes in N composition of sugar beet varieties in response to increasing N supply. Agronomy and Crop Science. 191, 138-145.
Hu, L., Wang, Z., Du, H., Huang, B., 2009. Differential accumulation of dehydrins in response to water stress for hybrid and common Bermuda grass genotypes differing in drought tolerance. Plant Physiology. 167, 103-109.
Kashiwagi, J., Krishnamurthy, L., Upadhyaya, H.D., Gaur, P.M., 2008. Rapid screening technique for canopy temperature status and its relevance to drought tolerance improvement in chickpea. Journal of Semi-Arid Tropical Agricultural Research. 6, 105-4.
Khazaie, H.R., 2002. Effect of drought stress on yield and physiological characteristic of drought tolerant and susceptible wheat cultivars and introduce the suitable drought tolerance index. Ph.D. Thesis, College of Agriculture, University of Ferdowsi Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. 225p. [In Persian].
Koocheki, A., 1996. Agriculture in Dry Lands. Jihade-Daneshgahi Press of Mashad. 202p. [In Persian].
Koocheki, A., Soltani, A., 1996. Sugar beet Agronomy. Jihade-Daneshgahi Press of Mashad. 200p. [In Persian].
Milford, G.F.J., Pocock, T.O., Riley, J., 1985. An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet. II: Leaf appearance in field crops. Annals of Applied Biology. 106, 163-172.
Mohamadian, R., 2001. Determinate of effective physiological indices on drought resistant on sugar beet. Ph.D. of Thesis Agronomy. Tabriz University. [In Persian].
Mohammadian, R., 2005. Some factors affecting the yield of sugar beet in drought stress conditions. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Seminar of Iranian Sugar and Sugar Factories, Mashhad, Iran. pp. 238-248. [In Persian].
Nadali, I., Paknejad, F., Ghaffari, M., 2014. Effct of methanol as source of carbon on some quantitative and qualititative traits of sugar beet under drought stress conditions. Journal of Crop Production Research. 6(3), 231-246. [In Persian with English Summary].
Nadali, I., Paknejad, F. Moradi, F., Vazan, S., Tookalo, M., Jami Al-Ahmadi, M. Pazoki, A.R., 2010. Effect of foliar application of methanol on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Australian Journal of Crop Science. 4(6), 398-401.
Nagler, P.L., Glenn, E.P., Huete, A.R. 2001. Assessment of spectral vegetation indices for riparian vegetation in the Colorado river delta, Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments. 49(1), 91–110.
Nourjoo, A., Baghaee Kia, M., 2004. Study on the irrigation cut-off effects at different growth stages on quantity and quality of sugar beet in Khoy region. Journal of Sugar Beet. 20(1), 27-38. [In Persian with English Summary].
Orazizadeh, M.R., Rajabi, A., Ahmadi, M. 2016. Selection of drought-tolerant half-sib families in sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet. 32(1), 1-12. [In Persian with English Summary].
Pierce, L.L., Running, S.W., Walker, J. 1994. Regional scale relationships of leaf area index to specific leaf area and nitrogen content. Ecological Applications. 4, 313-320.
Premachandra, G.S., Saneoka, H., Fujita, K., Ogata, S., 1992. Seasonal changes in leaf water relations and cell membrane stability in orchardgrass. Journal of Agricultural Science. 121, 169-175.
Rajabi, A., Vahidi, H., Haj Seyed Hadi, M.R., Fathollah Taleghani, D., 2013. Study on drought tolerance and interrelationships among some agronomic and morphophysiological traits in sugar beet lines. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. 5, 761-768.
Rinaldi, M., 2003. Variation of specific leaf area for sugar beet depending on sowing date and irrigation. Italian Journal of Agronomy. 7, 23-32.
Rytter, R.M., 2005. Water use efficiency, carbon isotope discrimination and biomass production of two sugar beet varieties under well-watered and dry conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 191(13), 426-438.
Sairam, R.K., Rao, K.V., Srivastava, G.C., 2002. Differential response of wheat genotypes to longterm salinity stress in relation to oxidative stress, antioxidant activity and osmolyte concentration. Plant Science. 163, 1037–1046.
Sadeghian, S.Y., Fazli, H., Mohammadian, R., Taleghani, D.E., Mesbah, M., 2000. Genetic variation for drought stress in sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet Research. 37, 55-77. [In Persian with English Summary].
Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S., Fathollah Taleghani, D., Fasahat, P., 2017. Effects of drought stress on quantitative and qualitative characteristics, canopy ground cover and wilting score of sugar beet genotypes. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 10(3), 363-375. [In Persian with English Summary].
Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S., Fasahat, P., 2016. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices and their correlation in sugar beet lines. Journal of Sugar Beet. 32(1), 13–27. [In Persian with English Summary].
Smirnoff, N., 1995. Antioxidant systems and plant response to the environment. In: Smirnoff, V. (ed.), Environment and Plant Metabolism: Flexibility and Acclimation. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford, UK.
Vahidi, H., Rajabi, A., Haj Seyed Hadi, M.R., Fathollah Taleghani, D., 2012. Effect of water stress on some quantitative and qualitative traits of sugar beet. 12th Iranian Crop sciences Congress, Karaj, Iran. [In Persian].
Vina, A., Gitelson, A.L., Nguy-Robertson, A., Peng, Y., 2011. Comparison of different vegetation indices for the remote assessment of green leaf area index of crops. Remote Sensing of Environment. 115(12), 3468-3478.
Westage, M., Boyer, J., 1985. Osmotic adjustment and the inhibition of leaf, root, stem and silk growth at low warerporentials in maize. Planta, 164, 459-540.
Wolf, D.W., Henderson, D.W., Hsiao, T.C., Alvino, A., 1988. Interactive water and nitrogen effects on senescence of maize. II. Photosynthesis decline and longevity of individual leaves. Agronomy Journal. 80, 865-870.
Yan, W., Kang, M.S., 2002. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists and agronomists. CRC press, Florida, USA, 267p.