Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Researcher of Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, South Khorasan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center

2 Faculty Member, Agriculture and Natural Resources Researchand Education Center, Razavi Khorasan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Salinity is one of the most important tensions in global agricultural production. About 20% of the irrigated lands are facing salinity problems in arid and semi-arid regions of the world, and salinity in these areas is increasing. In Iran, the salinity is about 44.5 million hectares, which has varying degrees of salinity and alkalinity (Banaei, et al., 2005). Selection of salt tolerant genotypes in farmer conditions is a practical and dealing ways in using saline water and soil. Millet cultivation in Iran has a long history and according to the short growth period, is able to feed forage in conditions where other sources of forage are not available. The cultivated area in Iran is about 10,000 hectares (Aaron, 2006). According to recent studies, it is possible to develop plant cultivation in all regions of the country. The area under cultivation of this plant in the south khorassan province is about 1000 hectares and the cultivation of this plant has long been rooted in the culture of farmers in this area (Bina, 1993). According to the adaptability of this plant to unfavorable environmental conditions, soil poverty and environmental stresses that are characteristic of arid and semi-arid regions such as South Khorasan. One of the easiest ways to identify and selection of resistant genotypes is explosion to stress and selection the genotypes that tolerate these conditions better than the others.

Materials and Methods
In order to evaluation of salt tolerance in foxtail millet genotypes, two separate experiment with 15 genotypes in saline and none-saline conditions arranged in randomized complete block design with three replications conducted in two years of 2012 and 2013 at the Research and Education Center of Southern Khorasan. Combined analysis of variance showed that salt stress lead to a significant reductions in days to heading, days to maturity, plant height, panicule length, number of panicule per plant and thousand seed weight.In the end, after determining the grain and forage yield in stress and non stress conditions, MP, GMP, TOL, HARM, STI and SSI indices were calculated and using SAS software, correlation between the indices with grain yield and The dry forage was examined and using the SigmaPlot software, the three-dimensional distribution chart of each sample was plotted in A, B, C, and D ranges.

Results and discussion
Millet seed yield and dry forage yield in saline condition decrease about 40 and 38 percent, respectively. Genotypes number 15-118, 15-24 and 15-120 with averages of 3827.8, 3805.1 and 3803.2 kg/ha had the highest and number 15-80 with 1977.2 kg/ha had the lowest two year averages of yield, respectively. Results of correlation of seed yield and dry forage yield of millet genotypes in saline and none-saline conditions with tolerance and sensitivity indices revealed that STI, MP and GMP are the best indices for selection and recognition of salt tolerance genotypes of foxtail millet. Genotypes numbers of 15-24, 15-76, 15-118 and 15-120 indentified as the most tolerant genotypes to salinity stress on the basis of 3D scattering graph.


Keywords

Aaron, J., Swart, L., Gibson, R., Douglas, L., Karlen, M.L., Jean-Luc, J., 2005.Planting data effect on winter triticale dry matter and nitrogen accumulation.Agronomy Journal. 97, 1333-1341.
Abidi, M., Qayyum, A., Dasti, A.A., Abdulmajid, R., 2001. Effect of salinity and SAR of irrigation water on yield, Physiological growth Parameters of Maize (Zea mays L.) and properties of the soil.Journal of Research (Science), Bahauddin Zakariya University, Bultan, Pakistan.12(1), 26-33.
Asadi, M., Mohammadi-Nejad, G., Golkar, P., Naghavi, H., Nakhoda, B., 2012. Assessment of salinity tolerance of different promising lines of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Advances in Applied Science Research. 3(2), 1117-1121.
Avalbaev, A.M., Bezhorkov, M.V., Kildibekova, A.R., Fatkutdinova, R.A., 2009. Wheat germagglutinin restores cell division and growth of wheat Seedlings under salinity. Journal of Plant Physiology, Special Issue. 257-263.
Azari Nasrabad, A., 2013. Effect of planting date on yield and yield components of promising lines of foxtail millet. Seed and Plant Production Journal. 2-28(1), 95-105. [In Persian with English Summary].
Bina, G.R., 1993. Study of plant density effect on yield and its components of three species of millet. M.Sc. Thesis, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran. [In Persian with English Summary].
Blum, A., 2001. Wheat cellular thermo tolerance is related to yield under heat stress. Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health. 117, 117-123.
Canama, T., Li, X., Holowachukb, J., Yu, M., Xia, J., Mandal, R., Krishnamurthy, R., 2013. Differential metabolite profiles and salinity tolerance between two genetically related brown seeded and yellow-seeded Brassica carinata lines. Plant Science. 198, 17-26.
Colmer, T.D., Flowers, T.J., Munns, R., 2006. Use of wild relatives to improve salt tolerance in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany. 57, 1059-1078.
Dura, S.A.M., Duwayri, M.A., Nachit, M.M., 2011. Effects of Different Salinity Levels on Growth, Yield and Physiology on Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durum). Jordan Journal of Agricultural Science. 7(3), 528-527.
Eker, S., Comertpay, G., 2009. Effect of Salinity Stress on Dry Matter Production and IonAccumulation in Hybrid Maize Varieties. Turkish Journal of Agriculture. 365-373.
Fernandez, G.C.J., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Kuo, C.G. (Ed), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, Tania, Taiwan.
Fischer, R.A., Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. Part 1: grain yield response. Austrailan Journal of Agricultural Research. 29, 897- 912.
Flowers, T.J., Yeo, A.R., 1995. Breeding for salinity tolerance in crop plants-where next. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. 22, 875-884.
Goudarzi, M., Pakniyat, D.H., 2008. Evaluation of wheat cultivars under salinity stress based on some agronomic and physiological traits. Journal of Agriculture and Social Sciences. 4, 35-38.
Haghnia, Gh., 1993. Manual of plants to salinity stress tolerance (Translation). Publications of University of Mashhad.[In Persian with English Summary].
Hajizad, S., Nakhoda, B., Mohammadi-Nejad, G., Tabatabaee, S.M.T., Zarandi, S., 2011. Indicators of salinity tolerance in 20 genotypes of bread wheat. Proceeding of The First National Conference on Modern Topics in Agriculture. September 10-12, Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch, Iran. pp: 744-751. [In Persian with English Summary].
Hall, A.F., 2001. Crop Responses to Environmental Stresses. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton. 232p
Kafi, M., Borzoei, A., Salehi, M., Kamandi, A., Masomi, A., Nabati, J., 2009. Environmental Stress on Plant Physiology. Jihad Daneshgahi publication, Iran.[In Persian with English Summary].
Kafi, M., Stwart, S., 1998. Effect of salinity on growth and yield of nine wheat cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 12(10), 76-85.
Kanafi Laskoukelayeh, M., Dehghani, H., Dvorak, J., 2015. Response of salt stress in some bread wheat varieties by tolerance indices. Cereal Research. 5(2), 145-157.
Mir Mohammad Meybodi, S.M.B.,Ghareyazi, B., 2003.Physiology aspects and breeding for salinity stress in plants. Isfahan University of Technology. [In Persian with English Summary].
Moghaddam, A., Hadizade, M.H., 2002. Response of corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids and their parental lines to drought using different stress tolerance indices. Plant Seed Journal. 18(3), 255-272. [In Persian with English Summary].
Munns, R., 1993. Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soil: some dogmas and hypothesizes. Plant Cell Invironment. 16, 15-24.
Norouzi, H., Roshanfekr, H.A., Hasibs, P., Mesgrbashy, M., 2014. The effect of irrigation water salinity on yield and quality of two forage millet cultivars. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture. 28(3), 560-551.
Qureshi, A.S., Qadir, M., Heydari, N., Turral, H., javadi, A., 2007. A review of management strategies for saltprone land and water resources in Iran. Colombo, Sri lanka: International water management Institute. 30p.
Ranjbar, G.H., Rousta, M.J., 2010. The most effective stability index for selection of wheat genotypes in saline condition. Soil Research Journal. 24(3), 283-290.[In Persian with English Summary].
Rosielle, A.A., Hamblin, J., 1987. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Science. 21, 943.946.
Sandhu G.R., Qureshi R.H., 1986. Salt-affected soils of Pakestan and their utilization. Reclamation and Revegetation Research. 5, 105-113.
Singh, B.R., Singh, D.P., 1994. Effect of moisture stress on morphological parameters and productivity of poaceous crops. Agro Botanical publishers India, Bikaner. 241-246
Taghvaei, M., Chaeichi, M., Sharifzadeh, F., Ahmadi, A., 2007. Evaluation of drought stress on yield and yield components and drought tolerance indices in hull-less and coated barley cultivars. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science. 38(1), 67-78. [In Persian with English Summary].
Zebarjadi, A.R., Tavakoli Shadpey, S., Etminan, A.R., Mohammadi, R., 2013. Evaluation of drought stress tolerance in durum wheat genotype using drought tolerance indices. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 29(1), 1-12.[In Persian with English Summary].