Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D student of Agricultural Faculty, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

2 Associate Prof.,of Agronomy and plant breeding Department, Agricultural Faculty, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

3 Associate Prof., Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran

4 Associate Prof., Department of Agronomy and plant breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

]Introduction
Today, wheat is grown on more land area than any other commercial crop and continues to be the most important food grain source for humans. Its production leads all crops, including rice, maize and potatoes.
Wheat is the most widely grown crop in the world and provides 20% of the daily protein and of the food calories for 4.5 billion people. It is the second most important food crop in the developing world after rice.
Drought is a major environmental stress threatening wheat productivity worldwide. Global climate models predict changed precipitation patterns with frequent episodes of drought. Although drought impedes wheat performance at all growth stages, it is more critical during the flowering and grain-filling(terminal drought) and results in substantial yield losses. So drought stress is one of the most common environmental stresses that makes production limitation in wheat. According to the FAO, 90 percent of Iran is located in dry and semi-arid areas. Iran, with an average rainfall of about 250 mm, has an average of about one-third of the world's rainfall. At present, the population of Iran is about 80 million and according to forecasts, the Iranian population will pass 120 million by 2020, based on a growth rate of 2% in 1400. Therefore, increased wheat production is inevitable.
Materials and methods
In order to identify drought stress tolerant wheat genotypes in greenhouse and field, 30 genotypes were studied as a sub factor in split plot experiment in a completely randomized design with randomized complete block design with three replications under normal and drought stress conditions in 2016-17.
Results and discussion
Analysis of variance showed a significant difference between genotypes in terms of grain yield under stress and non-stress conditions. In terms of seed yield in the field, genotypes cd-1, c-93-10 and Mihan with mean of 290.535, 282.835, 311.229 g/m2 were the most tolerant and in the greenhouse, Urom and C-93-8 genotypes with an average of 5.769 and 5.236 g in 5 plants per plant were identified as the most susceptible genotype for drought stress.
Also, based on the genotypic groupings based on the stress tolerance indices in field and greenhouse experiments, genotypes were located in four clusters and genotypes of cd-7, c-94-4, cd-2, c-93-5, c-93-9, cd-10, cd-11, cd-5, c- 94-6, c-94-8, cd-9, c-94-7, cd-1, c-93-3, c-93-10, and Urom were known as the most susceptible which were suitable for crosses or introductions for farmers in the target area. Considering that the use of an index is not effective for introducing the most tolerant figure and based on this principle, the results of genotypic grouping based on all indices, showed that the genotype was considered as the most tolerant genotype under greenhouse conditions due to low TOL, SSI and YP, YS, MP, GMP, HMP, STI, YI and YSI. Also, under field conditions, genotypes cd-7, c-94-4, cd-2, c-93-5, c-93-9, cd-10, cd-11, cd-5, c-94-6, c-94-8, cd-9, c-94-7, cd-1, c-93-3 and c-93-10, according to most indices, are most susceptible under field conditions. And are applicable in breeding programs for the production of high tolerance cultivars to end-of-season stress.

Keywords

Bouslama, M., Schapaugh, W.T., 1984. Stress tolerance in soybeans. I: evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance1. Crop Science. 34, 933-937.
Emam, Y., 2011. Cereal Crop Production. 4th Edition. Shiraz University Press. 190 pages. [In Persian].
Fernandez, G.C.J., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing stress tolerance. In: Kuo CG editor, Proceedings of the International Symposium on ‘Adaptation of vegetables and other food crops in temperature and water stress’. AVRDC Publication. Tainan, Taiwan. 13-18 Aug. Chapter 25,257-270.
Fischer, R., Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 29, 897-912.
Gasemi, M., 2017. Wheat cultivars of tolerance to end season drought stress in Ardabil plain. Agricultural research center, Ardabil. [In Persian with English summary].
Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campaline, R.G., Ricciardi, G.L. and Borghi, B., 1997. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter ceraeals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 77, 523-531.
Mohammadi R., Haghparast R., Aghaee-Sarbarzeh M., Abdollahi A., 2006. Evaluation of drought tolerance of advanced durum wheat genotypes based on physiological criteria and related traits. Journal of Agricultural Science. Iran, 3, 563-575. [In Persian with English summary].
 Murri, S., Emam, Y., Surshojani, H., 2013. Evaluation of terminal drought tolerance in wheat using yield, yield components and quantitative indices of drought tolerance. Journal of environmental stress in Crop Science. 5, 32-19.
Roohi, E., Siosemardeh, A., 2008. Study on gas exchange in different wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under moisture stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Seed and Plant. 24, 45-62. [In Persian with English summary].
Rosielle, A.A., Hamblin, J., 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment1. Crop Science. 21, 943-946.
Saba, J., Moghaddam, M., Ghassemi, M., Nishabouri, M.R., 2001. Genetic properties of drought resistance indices. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 3, 43-49.
Shafazadeh, M.K., Yazdansepas, A., Amini, A., Ghanadha, M.R., 2004. Study of terminal drought tolerance in promising winter and facultative wheat genotypes using stress susceptibility and tolerance indices. Seed and Plant. 20, 57-71. [In Persian with English summary].
Sio –Semardeh, A., Ahmadi, A., Poostini, K., Mohammad, V., 2006. Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditions. Field Crops Research.98, 222-229.
SPII. 2015. Report of wheat breeding program result during 2014-2015. Cereal Research Division, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Karaj, Iran. [In Persian with English summary].
SPII. 2016. Report of wheat breeding program result during 2015-2016. Cereal Research Division, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Karaj, Iran. [In Persian with English summary].
Zabarjadi, A. R., Tavakolishadpey, S., Etminan, A.R., Mohammadi, R., 2013. Evaluation of drought stress tolerance in durum wheat genotypes using drought tolerance indices. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 29, 1-12. [In Persian with English summary].