Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. Student of Biotechnology, Department of Plant Production, Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad Kavous, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Production, Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad Kavous, Iran.

3 Academic member, Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad Kavous, Iran.

4 Assistanc Professor, Department of Agronomic and Horticultural Research, Research and Education Center of Agriculture and Natural Resource in Mazandaran, Agricultural Extension and Education Research Organization, Sari, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Hordeum vulgare L. is one of the earliest products used by humans. Estimates of cereal consumption in the 2017-2018 crop season also increased and grew by 1.4% compared to the 2017-2016 season (FAO., 2017). The compared to other crops, barley has a distinct ecological adaptation and can be cultivated in a variety of climatic conditions (Samarah, 2005). Drought stress increases when the degree of evaporation of leaves exceeds the capacity and the ability of the roots to absorb water from the soil (Naghavi et al., 2016). Plants use different mechanisms for drought resistance, including these methods of escape or drought. Dam farming is dependent on the heavens and Iran is located on the world's dryland belt. By passing from spring to summer, rainfall levels are significantly reduced, and rain, crops grow late in the growing season, reaching and filling with dry land They encounter Joe is one of the major crops grown in rain-fed areas with moderate yields. Therefore, studies are conducted to select drought tolerant cultivars or genotypes in order to increase the yield of barley due to its cultivar and the increasing global dryness (Cattivelli et al., 2008). The purpose of the present study was to provide map of continuity of SSR, iPBS and ISSR markers, drought tolerance evaluation in the studied genotypes, identification of traits related to drought tolerance and location, and determination of continuous molecular markers for QTLs controlling barley agro-morphological traits under drought stress in The vegetative and reproductive stage in the F3 population was the result of a cross between Badia × Kumino cultivars.

Materials and methods
In order to locate the controlling genes associated with agromorphological traits in barley grower under normal conditions and drought stress, 100 F3 families from the cross between two cultivars Badia × Comino were evaluated in a completely randomized design with three replications. This research was carried out in the greenhouse of the University of Gonbad-e-Kavos in the years 2016-2017. Among the superior attributes of parent Badia, a higher performance, stress tolerance and lower cumulative parent stress tolerance and stress tolerance were noted. The continuity map was prepared using 49 pairs of SSR microsatellite markers, 10 ISSR alleles and 90 IPBS alleles.

Results
In this study, the intervals between the iPBS2077-4-iPBS2074-1 and iPBS2231-1-iPBS2274-5 markers on chromosomes number 5 and 7, due to having the highest number of controlling QTLs, were observed in the reproductive and reproductive stages as the most important genomic regions have been identified and their use in breeding programs will be effective as important issues.

Discussion
The results of analysis of variance showed that all traits evaluated at vegetative and reproductive stage had a significant difference in probability level of 1%. Therefore, it can be noted that there is a good genetic variation among the genotypes. A comparison of the mean of traits in Badia × Kumino parents showed that for all traits evaluated in vegetative and reproductive stage, values greater than the parent had the highest trait and less than the minimum trait parent, indicating an trangressive segregation for the studied traits.


Keywords

Altinkut, A., Kazan, K., Gozukirmize, N., 2003. AFLP marker linked to water stress tolerant bulks in barley. Genetic and Molecular Biology. 26, 77–82.
Alizadeh, 2005. Soli, Water and Plant Relatioships. Fourth Edition. Emam Reza Press. 470p. [In Persian].
Bezant, J., Lauri, D., Pratchett, N., Chojecki, J., Kearsey, M., 1997. Mapping QTL controlling yield and yield components in aspring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cross using marker regression. Molecular Breeding. 29, 29–38.
Bouyoucos, G.J., 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agronomy Journal. 54, 464–465.
Caetano–Anolles, G., Gresshoff, P.M., 1994. Staining nucleic acids with silver: An alternative to radioisotopic and fluorescent labeling. Promege Notes Magazine. 45, 13–21.
Castro, A.J., Hayes, P., Viega, L., Vales. I., 2008. Transgressive segregation for phonological traits in barley explained by two major QTL alleles with additivity. Plant Breeding. 127, 561–568.
Cattivelli, L., Rizza, F., Badeck, F.W., Mazzucotelli, E., Mastrangelo, A.M., Francia, E., Mar’ e.C., Tondelli, A., Stanca, A.M., 2008. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plant: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Research. 115, 1–14.
Cellier, F., Conejero, G., Breitler, J., Casse, F., 1998. Molecularand physiological response to water deficit in drought–tolerant and drought–sensitive lines of sunflower. Plant Physiology. 116, 319–328.
Daghagheleh, R., Sabouri, H., Hosseini Moghaddam, H., Jorjani, E., Fallahi, H.A., 2017. Mapping of spike and grain using f3 and f4 families in Becher × Kavir cross in barly. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology. 8(4), 35–56. [In Persian with English Summary].
FAO. 2016. FAO statistical database. http: // faostat. Fao.Org/faostat/collections? Subset=agriculture.
Fakheri, B.A., Mehravaran, L., 2013. QTLs mapping controlling phonological traits of barley under normal and drought stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Research. 13(2), 256-268. [In Persian with English summary].
Ganjali, A., Kafi, M., Bagheri, A.R., ShahriariAhmadi, F., 2003. Allometric relationship for root and shootcharacteristics of chickpea seedlings (Cicer arietinum). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 1, 67–80.
Gebhardt, C., Ballvora, A., Walkemeier, B., Oberhagemann, P., Schuler, K., 2004. Assessing genetic potential in germplasm collections of crop plant by marker – trait association: A case study for potatoes with guantitative variation of resistance to late blight and maturity type. Molecular Breeding. 13, 93–102.
Gupta, M.L., Prasad, A., Ram, M., Kumar, S., 2002. Effects of the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungus Glomus fasciculatum on the essential oil yield related cultivars of menthol mint (Mentha arvensis) under field conditions. Bioresource Technol. 81, 77–9.
Hajabbasi, M.A., 2001. Tillage effects on soil compactness and wheat root morphology. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 3, 67–77.
Haley, C.S., Knott, S.A., 1992. A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity. 69, 315–24.
Haluschak, P., 2006. Laboratory Methods of Soil Analysis. Canada–Manitoba Soil Survey. 133p.
Handly, L.L., Nevo, E., Raven, J.A., Martinez, R., Scrimgou, C.M., Pakniyat, H., 1994. Chromosome 4 controls potential water use efficiency in barley. Journal of Experimental Botany. 45, 1661–1663.
Czyczyło-Mysza, I., Marcińska, I., Skrzypek, E., Cyganek, K., Juzoń, K., Karbarz, M., 2014. QTL Mapping for Germination of seeds obtained from previous wheat generation under drought. Central European Journal of Biology. 9, 374–382.
Inamullah, N.H., Shah, Z.H., Fu, K., 2017. Analysis of the planting dates effect yield and yield attributes of spring wheat. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture. 23, 269–275.
Kavianicharati, A., Sabouri, H., Falahi, H.A., Jorjani, E., 2016. QTL Mapping of Spike Characteristics in Barley using F3 and F4 Families Derived from Badia × Komino Cross. Plant Genetic Research Journal. 3, 1.
Kosambi, D.D., 1944. The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Annals of Eugenics. 12, 172–175.
Khalili, M., JavaheriKhashani, F., Ebrahimi. M.A., 2017. Evaluation of genetic diversity and identification of QTL Controlling seed germination and seedling establishment traits in wheat. Iranian Agriculture Drought Journal. 1, 121–145. [In Persian with English summary].
Khalili, M., Mohammadi, S.A., 2015. Indentification of Wheat Germination Associated in Normal Conditions and Drought Stress. Scientific Journal of Biotechnology and Plant. 4, 1–14.
Lander, E.S., Botstein, D., 1989. Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics. 121, 185–99.
Loresto, G.C., Chang, T.T., 1981. Decimal scoring system for drought reactions and recovery ability in screening murseries of rice.Int. Rice Research Newsletter. 6, 9–10.
Li, Z., Mu, P., Li, C., Zhang, H., Li, Z., Gao, Y., Wang, X., 2005. QTL mapping of root traits in a doubled haploid population from a cross between upland and lowland japonica rice in three environments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 110, 1244–1252.
Macharo, M., Labonte, D.R., Oard, J.H., Kays, S.J., Mclaurin, W.J., 2004. Linking guantitative traits with AFLP markers in sweet potatoes using discriminate analysis. Acta Horticulturae. 637, 285–293.
Manly, K.F., Olson, J.M., 1999. Overview of QTLmapping software and introduction to map manager QTL. Mammalian Genom. 10, 327–334.
McCouch, S.R., Cho, Y.G., Yano, M., Paul, E., Blinstrub, M., Morishima, H., Kinoshita, T., 1997. Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genetics Newsletter. 14, 11–13.
Mohammadi, M., Baom, M., 2008. QTL analysis for morphologhical traits in the Population of double Haploide barley. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources. 45, 111–120. [In Persian with English Summary].
Mohammed, A.S., 2011. QTL Analysis for Drought Tolerance Related to Root and Shoot Traits in Barley (Hordeumvulgare L.). Ph.D. Dissertation, Bonn University, Germany.
MosaviShabestari, M., 2007. Evaluation of yield and yield components in 21 cold–weather wheat lines. MSc dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture. Tabriz Branch Islamic Azad University Gilan, Iran. [In Persian with English Summary].
Nelson, J., 1997. QGENE: Software for marker–based analysis and breeding. Molecular Breeding. 3, 239–245.
Page, A.L., 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America.
Panse, V.G., 1957. Genetics of quantitative characters in relation to plant breeding. Indian Journal of Genetic. 17, 317–398.
Peighambari, S.A., YazdiSamadi, B., Nabipour, A., Charmet, G., Sarrafi, A., 2005. QTL analysis for agronomic trait in barley doubled haploids population grown in Iran. Plant Science. 169, 1008–1013.
Rahimi, M., Abrahim Pour, F., Eshghi, R., 2013. Inheritance and QTL Mapping of Agronomical Traits in barley. Crop Biotechnology. 2, 35–48. [In Persian with English Summary].
Ritchie, S.W., Nguyen, H.T., 1990. Leaf Water content and gas exchange parameters of two wheat genotypes differing in drought resistance. Crop Science. 30, 105–111.
Samarah, N.H., 2005. Effects of drought stress on groeth and yield of barley. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 25, 145–149.
SaghiMaroof, M.A., Biyaoshev, R.M., Yang, G.P., Zhang, Q., Allard, R.W., 1994. Extra ordinarily polymorphic microsatellites DNA in barly species diversity, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 91, 5466–5570.
Sparks, D.L., Page, A., Helmke, P., Loeppert, R., Soltanpour, P., Tabatabai, M., Johnston, C.T., Sumner, M.E., 1996. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3: Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America Inc.
Tian, R., Jiang, G.H., Shen, L.H., Wang, L.Q., He, Y.Q., 2005. Mapping quantitative loci underlying the Cooking and Eating quality of Rice using a DH Population. Molecular Breeding. 15, 117–124.
Thomas, G., Sparks, D.L., Page, A., Helmke, P., Loeppert, R., Soltanpour, P., Johnston, C.T., Sumner, M.E., 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. Methods of soil analysis. Part 3: chemical methods. 475–490.
Walkley, A., Black, I.A., 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science. 37, 29–38.