Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Former graduate student of Agronomy, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khouzestan, Mollasani, Khuzestan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khouzestan, Mollasani, Khuzestan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khouzestan, Mollasani, Khuzestan, Iran

4 Expert of Agronomy, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khouzestan, Mollasani, Khuzestan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
To plant breeding in relation to high temperature tolerance, and for determining the differences between resistant genotypes, several indices in the basis of crop yield in normal and stressed conditions were be introduced. With regard to importance of genetic breeding for higher yield and stability in exposure to terminal heat stress in warm region of Iran, and little studies about tolerance of safflower cultivars, this study was carried out by measuring tolerance and sensitivity indices. Safflower is one the most important oil crops in regions that have dry and warm winters like to Khuzestan province of Iran. This crop are relatively tolerant to environmental stresses. But it is reported there are significant differences between different cultivars. The study was conducted to evaluate the difference between safflower cultivars in Ahvaz region.

Materials and Methods
To comparison of safflower cultivars by indices of tolerance and sensitivity to terminal heat stress, present study was carried out in Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, at 2016-2017. A split plot design in the basis of Randomized Complete Blocks Design (RCBD) with four replications was used for the study. Experimental factors was included four sowing date (11 November, 2 December, 5 January and 3 February) were placed in main plots, and safflower cultivars (sina, goldasht, soffeh, Esfahan local (kooseh) and faraman) were placed in subplots. In this study, several indices with regard to researcher’s reports were calculated and used for determining the difference between safflower cultivars. Statistical analysis was done using by SAS v. 9.1 software.

Results and Discussion
The results of statistical analysis showed that investigated cultivars had significant differences in terms of Stress Sensitivity index (SSI), Tolerance Index (TI), Productivity Mean (PM), Harmonic Mean (HM), Yield Stability Index (YSI), (GPM), Stress Tolerance Index (STI), Stress Damage Index (SDI), and Modified Stress Tolerance for appropriate conditions (MSTI1), Modified Stress Tolerance for no appropriate conditions (MSTI2), and Yield Reduction Index (YRI). However, differences between cultivars in terms of Ranking Index (RI) and Yield Index (YI) were not significant. Therefore, STI was the best index for evaluating tolerance and sensitivity of safflower cultivars to terminal heat. On the basis of STI, most tolerate and sensitive cultivars were goldasht and Esfahan local (kooseh), respectively.

Conclusion
The results showed that safflower cultivars had significant differences in terms of tolerance indices calculated in the study. In the basis of Stress Tolerance Index (STI), goldasht cultivar had highest tolerance (lowest sensitivity) and local Esfahan cultivar (kooseh) had lowest tolerance (highest sensitivity) to terminal heat stress.
Generally, in regions exposed to environmental stress, best cultivars are the cultivars that in normal conditions have high yield and in stressed conditions have no significant reduction f yield (group-A in Fernandez classification). In this study, stress tolerance index (STI) had good ability for determining of these cultivars.
Key words: Comparison, cultivar, grain yield, sowing date, stress tolerance index

Keywords

Abolhasani, K., Saeidi, G., 2006. Evaluation of drought tolerance in safflower lines based on water stress tolerance and susceptibility indices. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources. 3, 407-418. [In Persian with English Summary].
Arshad, Y., Zahrawi, M., Abadouz, Gh.R., 2016. Relationship between agronomic traits with tolerance to heat stress in bread wheat bulk. Journal of Research. 8(2), 104-90.
Ashraf, M., Harrice, P.J.C., 2005. Abiotic Stresses: Plant Resistance through Breeding and Molecular Approaches. The Haworth Press. New York. 725 p.
Bidinger, F.R., Mahalakshami, V., Rao, G.D.P., 1987. Assessment of drought resistance in pearel millet [Pennisetum americanum (L). Leeke]. II. Estimation of genotype response to stress. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 38, 49-59.
Bouslama, M., Schapaugh, W.T., 1984. Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science. 24, 933-937.
Chogan, R., Taher-Khani, T., Ghannadha, M.R., Khodrahmi, M., 2006. Drought tolerance analysis in corn-based inbred lines using drought stress tolerance indexes. Iranian Crop Sciences. 8(1), 79-89.
Dajue, L., Mundel, H.H., 1996. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.): Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 7. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben / International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, pp142_145.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2018. FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/ faostat/en/#data/QC
Fernandez, G.C.J., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Kuo, C.G. (ed.), Proceeding of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetable and other Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress. Taiwan, pp: 257-270.
Fisher, R.A., Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Researche. 29, 897-912.
Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campaline, R. G., Ricciardi, G.L., Borghi, B., 1997. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 77, 523–531.
Huang, B., 2000. Role of root morphological and physiological characteristics in drought resistance of plants. In: Wilkinson, R.E. (ed.), Plant Environment Interactions. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp. 39-64.
Kakaei, M., 2009. Effects of genotype and drought stress on physiological, morphological, phonological and biochemical traits of winter rape (Brassica napus L.). M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Branch of Kermansha, Iran. [In Persian with English Summary].
Maleki-Nejad, R., Majidi, M.M., 2013. Screening for endodontic dryness in internal and external germplasm of safflower based on sensitivity and tolerance indices. Journal of Production and Processing of Crop and Gardening. 15, 69-81.
MAJ (Ministry of Agriculture Jihad). 2017. Agriculture Statistical Year Book, First volume, crops. 2015-2016. http://www.maj.ir
Moshatati, A., Sayyidat, S.A., Alami Saeid, Kh., Bakhshandeh, A.M., Jalal Kamali, M.R., 2013. Comparison of wheat cultivars using endurance indices and endurance heat stress in Ahvaz. Journal of Plant Production. 36(2), 73-62. [In Persian with English Summary].
Naderi, A., Majidi Harawan, I., Hashemi Dezfuli, A.H., Rezaei, A.L., Nourmohammadi, Gh., 1999. Tolerance of indicators of evaluation of crop tolerance to environmental stresses and the introduction of a new indicator. Journal of Seedlings and Seeds. 15(4), 402-390. [In Persian with English Summary].
Nassar, R., Huhn, M., 1987. Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: Tests of significance for nonparametric measures on phenotypic stability. Biometrics. 43, 45-53.
Nasseri, F., 1991. Oil Seeds Publication. Astan Quds Razavi, Mashhad. 823 p. [In Persian].
Omidi, A.H., 2011. Effect of irrigation withhold at different growth stages on grain yield and stress tolerance indices in three safflower cultivars. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 13, 116-130. [In Persian with English Summary].
Porch, T. G., 2006. Application of stress indices for heat tolerance screening of common bean. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 192, 390-394.
Pourdad, S.S., Alizadeh, K., Azizinegad, R., Shariati, A., Eskandari, M., Khiavi, M., Nabatee, E., 2008. Study on drought resistance in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) in different locations. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources. 12, 403-416. [In Persian with English Summary].
Radmehr, M., 1997. Effect of Heat Sress on Physiology of Growth and Development of Wheat. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Publication. 201p. [In Persian].
Rosielle, A.A., Hamblin, J., 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Science. 21, 943-946.
Sadeghzadeh-Ahari, D., 2006. Evaluation for tolerance to drought stress in dry land promising durum wheat genotype. Iranian Crop Sciences. 8, 30-45.
Sio-Se Mardeh, A., Ahmadi, A., Poustini, K., Mohammadi, V., 2006. Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditions. Field Crops Research. 98, 222–229.
Wahid, A.S., Ashraf, M., Foolad, M.R., 2007. Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 61, 199-223.
Yari, P., Keshtkar, A.H., Mazahery Laghab, H.A., 2016. Evaluation of water stress in spring Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivar using tolerance indices in Hamadan region. Journal of Crop Breeding. 18, 88-96.
Zarghami, R., Zahravi, M., Aslanzadeh, A., Abassali, M., 2012. Evaluation of autumn sown genotypes of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) for tolerance to drought stress. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 3, 339-355.