نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، گروه اگروتکنولوژی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

2 استاد، گروه اگروتکنولوژی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

3 دانشیار گروه زراعت دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه پیام نور تهران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی تاثیر بیوچار و سرکه چوب در تغذیه گیاه سویا به‌عنوان گیاهی پراهمیت در زمینه تولید روغن و پروتئین مورد نیاز انسان است، که از این طریق تأثیر این دو تیمار بر مقاومت گیاه به تنش خشکی به‌عنوان تنش مطرح محیطی در ایران شناخته شود. به  این ‌منظور آزمایشی به‌صورت کرت‌های یک‌بار خردشده در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در طول فصل زراعی 1398 در مزرعه تحقیقاتی دانشکده کشاورزی تربیت مدرس انجام شد. عامل اصلی این آزمایش شامل چهار رژیم آبیاری (تنش کمبود آب شدید، متوسط و ملایم و آبیاری مطلوب) و عامل فرعی شامل مواد ضد تنش یعنی سه غلظت سرکه چوب (غلظت‌های ppm5000، ppm10000 وppm 15000) و یک سطح بیوچار (5 تن در هکتار) و تیمار شاهد (بدون مواد ضد تنش) بودند. تنش کمبود آب در اوایل گلدهی گیاه اعمال شد. نتایج نشان داد تنش کمبود آب باعث کاهش معنی‌داری بر صفات ارتفاع، سطح برگ، تعداد غلاف در بوته، عملکردهای بیولوژیک، دانه، کاه، روغن و وزن هزار دانه شد. به‌طورکلی تیمار کودی (شامل سطوح سرکه چوب و بیوچار) در جدول آنالیز واریانس برای صفات ارتفاع بوته، تعداد غلاف و عملکرد کاه معنی‌دار نبود، اما بر سایر صفات اثر معنی‌داری داشت. ترکیب تیماری روی سطح برگ و عملکردهای بیولوژیک، دانه و روغن در سطح 1% معنی‌دار بود. به‌طورکلی استفاده از بیوچار در شرایط مطلوب آبیاری و سرکه چوب در شرایط تنش کمبود آب موجب بهبود عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد گیاه به تنش شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

Ahmadi, A., Siosemardeh, A., 2004. Effects of water stress on soluble carbohydrates, chlorophyll and proline contents of four Iranian wheat cultivars under different moisture regimes. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science. 35, 753-763. [In Persian with English Summary].
Apai, W., Thongdeethae, S., 2002. Wood vinegar: new organic for Thai Agriculture. The 4th Toxicity Division Conference, Department of Agriculture. pp. 166-169.
Behtari, B., Golazani, K., Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab, A., Zehtab Salmasi, S., Torchi, M., 2005. Effects of water restriction on oil storage, protein and grain yield in two soybean cultivars, Master Thesis in Agriculture, University of Tabriz. p. 76. [In Persian].
Burnette, R., 2010. An introduction to wood vinegar. ECHO Asia Regional Office. from http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.echocommunity.org
Chanbdracar, B.L., Sechar, N., Tuteja, S.S., Tripathi, R.S., 1994. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen of growth and yield of summer sesame (Sesamum indicum) Indean. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 39, 701-702.
Coffman, C.B., Radhakrishnan, J., Teasdale J. R., 2005. Corn and soybean responses to basal applications of vinegar. Proceedings of Northeastern Weed Science Society. pp. 59-79.
Cox, W.J., Jollif, G.D.,  1986. Growth and yield of sunflower and soybean under soil water deficits. Agronomy Journal. 78, 226-230.
Daneshian, J., Noor Mohammadi, G H., Jonoobi, P., 2002. Responses of soybean to drought stress and different amounts of phosphorus, Abstracts of Seventh Iranian Crop Sciences Congress, Karaj, Seed and Plant Improvement Research Institute. [In Persian].
Dasberg, S.,  Bakker, J.W., 1970. Characterizing soil aeration under changing soil moisture conditions for bean growth. Agronomy Journal. 62, 689-692. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1970.00021962006200060001x
Dogan, E., Kirnak, H., Copur, O., 2007. Deficit irrigation during soybean reproductive stages and CROPGRO-soybean simulations under semi-arid climatic conditions. Field Crops Research. 103,154-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.05.009
Farnia, A., Madani, H., 2011. The effect of drought stress and different strains of Rhizobium japonica on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Clark cultivar soybean. New Agricultural Findings. 4, 391-404. [In Persian with English Summary].
Fowden, L., Mansfield, T., Stoddart, J., 1993. Plant Adaptation to Environmental Stress. Springer Dordrecht, pp. 132-149.
Guillen, M.D., Manzanos, M.J., 2002. Study of the volatile composition of an aqueous oak smoke preparation. Food Chemestry. 79, 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S03088146(02)00141-3
Halterlein, A.J., 1988, Bean. In: . Teare, I.D., Peet, M.M. (eds.), Crop Water Relations. pp 158–185. Wiley, New York.
Jha, P., Biswas, A.K., Lakaria, B.L., Subba Rao, A., 2010. Biochar in agriculture – prospects and related implications. Current Science. 99, 1218– 1225.
Kadhem, F.A., Specht, J.E., Williams, J.H., 1985. Soybean irrigation serially timed during stage R1 to R6. Agronomic responses. Agronomy Journal. 77, 291-298. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1985.00021962007700020026x
Karam, F., Masaad, R., Sfeir, T., Mounzer, O., Rouphael, Y., 2005, Evapotranspiration and seed yield of field grown soybean under deficit irrigation conditions. Agricultural Water Managment. 75, 226-244.
Laohasiriwong, S., 1986. Yield response of selected soybean cultivars to water stress during different reproductive growth periods. In: Sulzberger, E.W., Mclean, B.T. (eds.), Soybean in Tropical and Subtropical Cropping Systems; Symposium, Tsukuba, Japan, September 26-October 1986. The Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan. ystems. pp.383-386.
 Liu, F., Jensen, C.R., Andersen, M.N., 2004. Drought stress effect on carbohydrate concentration in soybean leaves and pods during early reproductive development: its implication in altering pod set. Field Crops Research. 86, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00165-5
Manavalan, L. P., Guttikonda, S. K., Tran, L.S.P., Nguyen, H.T., 2009. Physiological andmolecular approaches to improve drought resistance in soybean. Plant Cell Physiology. 50,1260–1276. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcp082
Mia, S., van Groenigen, J .W., van de Voorde, T.F.J., Oram, N.J., Bezemer, T.M., Mommer, L., Jeffery, S., 2014. Biochar application rate affects biological nitrogen fixation in red clover conditional on potassium availability. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 191, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.011
Modhan, M.M., Narayanan, S. L., Ibrahim, S. M., 2000. Chlorophyll stability indexes (CSI): its impacts on salt tolerance in rice. International Rice Research Institute. Notes. 25, 38-40.
Mungkunkamchao, T., Kesmala, T., Pimratch, S.,   Toomsan, B., Jothityangkoon, D., 2013. Wood vinegar and fermented bioextracts: Natural products to enhance growth and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Horticultural Science and Technology. 154, 66-72.
Nishio, M., 1996. Microbial Fertilizers in Japan. Extension Bulletin. Food and Fertilizer Technology Center, National Institute of Agro-Environmental Science, Ibaraki.
Omidi. H., Movahadi, F., Movahadi, S.H., 2012. The effect of salicylic acid and scarification on germination characteristics and proline, protein and soluble carbohydrate content of Prosopis (Prosopis farcta L.) seedling under salt stress.  Scientific Information Database. 18, 608-623.
Pitikainen, J., Kiikkila, O., 2000. Charcoal as a habitat for microbes and its effect on the microbial community of the underlying humus. Oikos. 89, 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890203.x
Rabiee, H., Davari, M., Moghiminejad, S., Armaghan, F., 1352. Biochar (semi-combustible biomaterial), soil modifier in sustainable agriculture. National Conference on Agricultural Science and Technology. Malayer. [In Persian with English Summary].
Rondon, M.A., Lehmann, J., Ram´ırez, J., Hurtado, M., 2007. Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with bio-char additions. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 43, 699–708.
Sarmadniya, Gh., 1994. The importance of environmental stresses in agriculture. Key Articles of the First Iranian Congress of Agriculture and Plant Breeding. Karaj. 18-15. [In Persian].
Shin, S.H., Park, K.Y.,  Lim, S.G., Shin, S.O., Ha, T.Y., Suh, D.Y., 2005. Changes in source-sink balance during full-pod stage of soybean under drought stress. Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute,  Nation Institute of Crop. from http://w.w.w.rims.rda.go.kr/rims_2005
Shokohfar, A., Abofitilenegad, S., 2013. Effects of drought stress on some physiological and biological function mung bean varieties (Vigna radiate L.) in Desful. Crop Phisiology Journal. 5, 49-59. [In Persian with English Summary].
Smider, B., Singh, B., 2014. Agronomic performance of a high ash biochar in two contrasting soils. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 191, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.01.024
Suppadit, T., Phumkokrak, N., Poungsuk, P., 2012. The effect of using quail litter biochar on soybean (Glycine max L.) Production. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 72, 244-251.
Tiilikkala, K., Fagernas, L., Tiilikkala, J., 2010. History and use of wood pyrolysis liquids as biocide and plant protection product. The Open Agriculture Journal. 4, 111-118.
Uddin, S., Murayama, S., Ishimine, Y., Tsuzuki, E.H., 1995. Effect of the Mixture of Charcoal with Pyroligneous Acid on dry matter production and root growth of summer planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Japanese Journal of Crop Science. 64, 747-753.  https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.67.149
Wimmer, J., 2011. Biochar Research and a Case Study in Kansas. University of Kansas.
Yamato, M., Okimori, Y., Wibowo, I.F., Anshori, S., Ogawa, M., 2006. Effects of the application of charred bark of Acacia mangium on the yield of maize, cowpea and peanut, and soil chemical properties in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 52, 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2006.00065.x
Yatagai, M., Unrinin, G., 1989. Germination and growth regulation effects of wood vinegar components and their homologs on plant seeds - acids and neutrals. Mokuzai. Gakkaishi. 35, 564–571.
Zhang, A., Liu, Y., Pan, G., Hussain, Q., Li, L., Zheng, J., Zhang, X., 2012. Effect of biochar amendment on maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions from a soil from central China plain. Plant and Soil. 351, 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0957-x
Zulkarami, B., Ashrafuzzaman, M., Husni, M.O., Ismail, M.R., 2011. Effect of pyroligneous acid on growth, yield and quality improvement of rockmelon in soilless culture. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 5, 1508-151.